Taxcutter says: There have been convictions of vote fraud. Not investigations. Not indictments. Convictions with prison time attached. But those are like roaches. For every one you see there are many, many more you haven't seen. Yet.
Taxcutter says: Like druggies, for every one you catch, there are many, many more you don't catch - - unless you try harder.
The people who continue to make that false claims about voting fraud and intimidation are Democrats. The left is always going the extra mile in creating votes where none exist and using groups like The Black Panthers to intimidate voters. The Democrats have even gone so far as take an election result to the Supreme Court looking to recount votes from only fraud riddled Democrat strongholds. Then they cry foul when the courts disallow the cherry picking.
So far, I have not seen any intelligent rebuttal to my statements - just the usual garbage. By the way, I found my copy of the 2014 world almanac. The population of Maryland is given as 5,884,563. If all 44,000 alleged dual registrations are legitimate and voted, that equals .74771% of the population, hardly a landslide. When you do the same math for the 164 people who allegedly voted in both states, you get the huge .00278%. Do the same math for Virginia and the numbers are .71129% and .00265%. Junius, fils says: Like druggies, for every repub lie you catch, there are many, many more you don't catch - - unless you try harder.
I have. Any HONEST research backs me up. If you ask really nicely, I'll be absolutely overjoyed to re-post THAT series of letters, with actual sources (and not FAUX news) given, title and page number or web site. I doubt if you'll enjoy the experience, but I can stand that. Some of us actually research subjects. Try it.
He can't, Wanna bet? but he can show examples of Democrat party operatives intimidating voters entering polling places. Which exist only in the disordered dreams of the ditto-heads.
*Gasp* you mean it does occur? Imagine that. Doesn't matter if they are GOP or not fraud is fraud. - - - Updated - - - and that is 164 too many - - - Updated - - - since when is there a side, other then the American side? Also you do realize this has been an issue long before Obama came around. And does it matter if it is 1 time, or 1 million? No, any voter fraud is too much.
1. Virginia has voted democrat past two presidential election cycles. Democrats represent the governorship and senate in virginia 2. 1 dual vote is 1 too many. Doesn't matter how many occur, any is too many. 3. Prove voter suppression. You can't because it does not happen with voter id laws. No it happens when thugs and operatives intimidate voters to either stay away and not vote, or vote a certain way. - - - Updated - - - you are aware there have been convictions of voter fraud correct? How many convictions of voter suppression have occured as a result of voter id laws? Zero
so since it's sucha small percentage, we should just allow them to break the law and do nothing to combat it? Makes zero sense. Voter ID laws make sense. Takes an ID to drive, buy a gun, buy alcohol, buy a house, ride an airplane, when you get arrested they ask for ID.
Perhaps the address lists are not accurate. Seems plausible to me that someone registered in each state when they moved from one to the other and that the purge of the rolls was not thorough enough. All of this proves that we need a national voter amendment that guarantees the right to vote and that the registration process by state is not adequate. It should be a national database that uses one central clearing house, ie, SS files, to determine state residency.
What's not accurate is the methodology used to arrive at the number of people who voted in both states, which is actually much closer to zero, and quite possibly is exactly zero. I seriously doubt the number of people with dual registrations given as 44,000 is actually anywhere near that number. I don't doubt that there are a number of people who moved from one state to another, and registered in their new state of residence. I doubt many, if any of them voted in both locations, if they did, they will be prosecuted. I have never informed the registrar of voters when I moved out of a jurisdiction, I just register at my new address, and I may have remained on the rolls at the old location for a year, until they reconciled the voter roll with the town census. So I would guess that when they check on the "164 people who voted in both states" they will find that people with the same name voted, but not the same person, It will be like South Carolina, where "950 dead people voted" turned into "actually there were no illegal votes it was all clerical error".
OK. Since you asked, I'll try to find that LOOOOOOOOOOONG series of letters and re-post them. Don't bother to thank me. It's my pleasure.
In your imagination, perhaps.Maybe you can link to the hundreds and thousands of convictions for voter fraud?
Rs are honest people.. I don't know what idiot would vote for the lying libs (redundant term)... but I guess everyone cant be as smart as us Rs... (sigh) too bad... would be a more interesting world if they could be
Doesn't have to be to sway a close election does it. How many fraudulent votes in Florida could have swayed the entire Presidential election? - - - Updated - - - And your examples of this massive specialize suppression in which the Republicans engage.
The libs think voter ID is voter suppression. They're concerned about voter ID suppressing their fraudulent votes.
Yes but not a infringement to exercise the constitutionally explicit right to keep and bear a firearm.
This is not voter fraud or even fraudulent voter registration. There is no requirement to cancel your old voter registration when you move, so naturally anyone that moves to another state will show up on both roles. Considering that about 30,000 people per year move between Maryland and Virginia, the 44,000 number sounds about right. If one was to play the percentages, probably about 65.