Mueller is still missing one thing... A crime to investigate.

Fascists and other Totalitarians investigate a person in search of a crime.

In America we're supposed to investigate a crime and look for a guilty party. We call it "Justice".

This investigation was not based on looking for the person(s) that committed a crime. Like all Witch-Hunts, the Mueller investigation is not looking for justice, it's looking to target a specific individual.

And naturally, Democrats are all in favor of it..

https://www.theamericanconservative...s-investigation-is-missing-one-thing-a-crime/

 

Which is why the only output is either a conspiracy, collusion, perjury, or soft crime against the state. We haven't seen actual crime, not like ms Clinton compromising the security of the nation, or mr Obama using his power to attack a political opponent. right?

 

The facts agree with your assessment.

 

You damn right we are. If someone broke the law and used illegal methods to get in your house you would want them arrested and removed. There's a bunch of us that know there is a crook who broke the law to get in our house (WHITE) and we want him arrested and removed.

 

Why didn’t you ask for Obama’s removal when it was discovered he knowingly took in millions in illegal campaign donations?

 

republicans do not investigate fellow republicans unless they have too... sadly it looks like Trump has some things that need to come out into the open.. Nixon all over again?

 

could be like President Clinton, a simple perjury charge... but we will see, we have already seen much evidence that points to a lot of potential crimes, let's just let Mueller do his job

and do not forget his fixer implicating him in a crime

 

"In late 2012, President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign was fined $375,000 by the FEC for reporting violations. The major issue concerned the timely documentation of donations made in the 20 days prior to the election, a window of time during which the FEC requires official notice of contributions exceeding $1,000 to be submitted no more than 48 hours after receipt of those donations."

https://www.snopes.com/news/2018/08/22/election-law-violations-compared-obama-2008-vs-trump-2016/

 

so... you just know it, right?? the entire democratic party just "knows" that the man must have cheated to gain entry, even though he has the lease in his hand and the key in his pocket. these entitled little twits were so confident that they had the election sewn up that they know their loss must have been due to some illegal activity, they just have to keep digging until they can make one up. these are the same fools that are claiming they are just too smart for the average american to understand. what a load of crap.

and after nearly two years of digging, what have these oh so intelligent morons come up with? they've turned the lives of everyone associated with this administration completely upside-down and managed to find minor malfeasance among a few of the minor players. what they are being accused of is considered business as usual among the denizens of the washington establishment, but it's enough to catch the attention of the drones. with a 24/7 propaganda cycle feeding us every negative interpretation as established fact, they still haven't managed to convince anyone but the most kool-ade drenched idjit that they are even close to linking the president to anything more than failing to dot a couple of i's and cross a few t's. with well planned leaks and plenty of illicit judicial interference, they have managed to paint the president as the monster. now all they need is to invent the proper crime to charge him with.

these are precisely the sort of banana republic antics we have come to expect from the democrats - make wild accusations, spread rumor and innuendo, take full advantage of "guilt by association" and wait for the ignorant masses to consider your fantasies as truth. of course it will work. if the posts i've seen here are any indication of the level of intelligence we can expect from the average voter, the electorate is incapable of seeing through even the flimsiest illusions and of believing anything their small minds are told to believe.

 

RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA.

Anything else in nothing more than conducting a witch hunt.

 

Trump didn't use partisan FISA warrants in his campaign. Trump won fair and square.

Your analogy failed, just like Hillary and a few corrupt FBI hacks failed 2 years ago.

 

Nixon was a Saint compared to Obama.

If you want to look backwards, open your eyes.

 

Please remind us how many Republicans were present during the tarmac meeting?

And please remind us why all Clinton aides got immunity in exchange for nothing during the Obama administration while all Trump people get entrapped, investigated all the way to their childhood, intimidated, spied on and have false confessions literally blackmailed out of them.

 

At least consider the idea that mr Clinton was under investigation for having raped and sexually harassed folks. Why leave that part out? I don't recall at the time believing that justice had been done because of the furtive lie about having harassed his intern. And like you folks always remind me, Bill/Hill are the ultimate lawyers, right? So what they issued as statements were legitimate, although clearly not the truth.

But never forget that there were, indeed real crimes behind the man. I said it then, and will continue to say it now, this is lazy lawyering. And certainly not justice.

 

https://www.lawfareblog.com/how-fisa-court-really-works

Prosecutors Effectively Accuse Trump of Defrauding Voters. What Does It Mean?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/08/us/politics/trump-mueller-cohen-manafort.html

WASHINGTON — The latest revelations by prosecutors investigating President Trump and his team draw a portrait of a candidate who personally directed an illegal scheme to manipulate the 2016 election and whose advisers had more contact with Russia than Mr. Trump has ever acknowledged.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...-says-agencies-agree-russian-meddling-n785481

 

He's already uncovered several.

 

What's your point? Did you ask for him to be impeached for this violation of the law?

 

I didn't think so.

 

You validate MAJA's point. You say, "If someone broke the law......" The problem is there was no law broken that triggered Mueller's investigation. Otherwise that illegality would have been specifically spelled out -- as it is supposed to be -- in his appointment letter. But it was not. His appointment letter charged Mueller to go see if he can find anything tied to Trump -- the quintessential definition of a witch hunt.

 

And so are Republicans. The only one you see saying that Mueller should be stopped is Trump. What does that tell you?

 

We don't know that. You don't know that.

 

uncovered><manufactured

 

Exactly. An investigation looking for a crime.