Mueller report: Barr lied! There was was obstruction... and... surprise surprise...

That is one hell of a confusing sentence. Its very simple - did Crist ask Barr if he was aware of any concerns?

 

What Powers Does a Formal Impeachment Inquiry Give the House?

https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-powers-does-formal-impeachment-inquiry-give-house

 

**

 

This is the problem with your argument that Barr lied under oath. You're basing it on his response to a question that he was simply not even asked!

Crist's Question:
"Reports have emerged recently that members of the special counsel’s team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24th letter, that it does not adequately or accurately, necessarily, portray the report’s findings. Do you know what they’re referencing with that?"

 

And which you made up.

 

What did I make up? Crist's question? Here it is again:

"Reports have emerged recently that members of the special counsel’s team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24th letter, that it does not adequately or accurately, necessarily, portray the report’s findings. Do you know what they’re referencing with that?"

You can easily verify that he spoke those EXACT words! And this is what you based your assertion on that Barr lied!

 

Mueller never said Barr lied. If anything he would have liked Barr to wait for the redactions before releasing "anything" to Congress. But The House Democrats couldn't wait so he released a synopsis in the interim.

He should have not released anything because he was not legally obligated to do so. But when he was confirmed he promised he would and kept his word.

 

He promised he would what?

 

And I assume you are saying Barr answered "yes" to that question. Because any other answer would be a lie. A.k.a. perjury.

 

So you think that Mueller's letter to Barr explained what some unknown members of the Special Counsel's team were referencing? How could Barr know why they think that his letter did not "adequately or accurately, necessarily, portray the report’s findings?" Is he a mind reader? Now, if Crist instead asked Barr if he was aware of any concerns about his letter, then any other answer than yes would've been a lie, AKA perjury.

 

That's not the question

 

Ever since Clinton was impeached for perjury the left has been projecting their corruption on others

 

Clinton never should have been impeached for perjury and the same kind of kangaroo clown show tactics are at play in the Trump affair.

Stupid begets stupid.

 

During his confirmation he said he would release what he legally could of the report, which is what he did. This is why it is so obvious the Democrats are only playing politics with this entire issue. I hope Barr and those he has assigned to investigate the investigators find they conspired.

 

Because Barr talked to Muller after receiving Mullers communication. Muller didn't say he lied but only was disappointed that Barr gave Congress anything before the redacted report.

 

Actually, I think that Mueller would've been content with Bar including in the letter all of the bad stuff that Trump did.
Which of course, would've been utterly POINTLESS considering that it was all in the report which was released a couple of weeks later! Mueller was being a little whinny BITCH! It was within Barr's job description to comment on the principle conclusions of the report. Anything else would fall outside of his job description.

 

Barr didn't by law have to release the Muller report. Only his decision, no conspiracy or collusion. And if game. The Democrats are so desperate. If a Democrat is ever elected President, I feel for him/her.

 

You don't think that Trump should be impeached?

 

Why is that?

 

How could Barr know what they were referencing? Is he a mind reader?

 

For what ? Certainly not on the basis of the kangaroo clown show that has been going on with respect to "Russiagate".

 

No. He has a much more amazing paranormal power: he's a letter reader

 

So you're saying that Mueller's letter to Barr explains exactly what was being referenced? Does Mueller refer to that media report in his letter? I will say that Mueller essentially says the same thing in his letter, that barr's letter "does not adequately or accurately, necessarily, portray the report’s findings", however, Mueller himself doesn't go into detail about what he thinks was missing. Anyway, even with this, Barr follows up his "no" response to Crist with a suggestion that maybe they wanted more information in his letter! And again, Crist's question was NOT if Barr was aware of any concerns from Mueller!

 

You don't think there is a case for impeachment for Trump's conduct in trying to interfere with the Mueller investigation?

 

Including the name of the reporter, their shirt color, what they had for breakfast and the brand of underwear. Without such fundamental and vital information, how would Barr know that Mueller's letter was expressing dissatisfaction as to the way he had portrayed the Mueller report? It would have been impossible!