Mueller: Russia sought to help Trump win but did not collude with campaign

um...no he didn't. Mueller exonerated him of any conspiracy, and he specifically left it up to the DOJ to exonerate him on obstruction after turning over all the evidence, and they specifically did just that.

Where are you getting your information from? Clearly, second hand

 

How quickly you and the left turned on Mueller. Not at all surprised. The difference here is you, unlike our President is actually a puppet of Putin.

 

Yah putin didn’t help get me elected.

 

Lol it’s not up the DOJ to exonerate him of obstruction it’s up to congress.

 

No, but you certainly helped him accomplish his ultimate goal of spreading discourse and division. Pat yourself on the back, wait...maybe Putin will pull your strings for you.

 

Maybe if our president wasn’t running around defending Russia and attacking his own DOJ it wouldn’t have been as successful

 

um....Congress doesn't prosecute crimes in the United States....maybe in Russia...but in the United States, Congress is specifically denied the ability. Please, at least read our Constitution if you are going to try and spread discourse and division for Putin.

 

Uhm they do for the president. Lol are you joking here??

 

Defending Russia? Maybe you should stop following the Russian propaganda machine at MSNBC and the DNC...then you'd see he actually has been far far tougher on Russia then "more flexible" Obama. Moreover, the only people I see attacking the DOJ today is folks like yourself.

 

Which is a lie. Trump has been far tougher on Russia than Obama. Obama let Putin invade the Crimea.

 

No it's not. Congress does not exonerate anyone. Where do you get such silly nonsense? Watching CNN? lol

 

He clearly feels the same way about the left And unlike your small tiny insignificant peep he parades the leftist peeps front and center to world as reactionary drama fools that can only spin a tale of nonsense

 

Um Read Art I Section 9 of the United States Constitution. It specifically bans that practice. Often called Bills of Attainder. Geez. He was cleared of any criminal wrong doing. Those unable to accept that are simply Putin puppets doing his bidding and not accepting the Mueller Report

 

Spin a tale with of a donkey

 

Better a facist than a traitor..

 

So Obama was a fascist? Glad you finally admitted it. Too bad you are wrong about Americans supporting their current President.

 

Certainly you've learned by now that guy doesnt have Clue 1 what is going on..

 

Continue to support Trump at your own embarrassment.. Mueller report is clear, at least the summary I read yesterday..

And dont think Bill DisBarr is coming to the rescue.. that guy lost credibility way faster than even Sessions did..

 

He was not cleared of obstruction.
Presidents can’t be indicted they have a trial in congress. How do you not understand this?

 

- Winning! No collusion, no obstruction, no indictments of any Americans related to Russian interference.

You should be worried about Bill Barr. This guy is someone who doesn't take treason and coup attempts lightly. Not at all.

 

Are you saying that because they did not do anything that they are guilty of collusion by not colluding???? That makes absolutely no sense.

There is nothing illegal about anticipating a benefit from the actions of others...even if those others are a foreign entity. In today political world, I even doubt if a majority of politicians would think it was unethical. I can not think of a single politician running for President or have ran for President that would not cheer if they had benefitted in the same fashion.

TRYING does not equate to criminal intent. Trump is lucky to have people that did the smart thing....or better yet, did not do the dumb things. Legally, the DOJ does work for Trump and the Special Counsel does work for the DOJ. Trump did have the authority to fire Mueller. However, the courts would have needed to decide if it would have been appropriate. Personally, I think the DOJ needs to be under the Judicial branch. But in the end....the desire to "obstruct" does not fall into the realm of criminal intent.

 

Yes, he was. No Collusion, No Obstruction. Which part of this do you not understand?

No obstruction. None.

Obama spied on Trump. That we know too. That will be investigated very shortly.

 

No he didn’t, and no it won’t be.
trump obstructed, but don’t worry Congress is unlikely to do much about it.

 

Um he certainly was, read the DOJ’s memo to congress. They specifically did. Sure he can be impeached by congess, however we’ve never had that happen without the DOJ recommending criminal charges

 

Congress can not even investigate unless it is for Legislative Purposes (i.e.oversight of an existing law to evaluate it's functionality or for the purpose of creating new laws). This has been decided by SCOTUS over a hundred years ago.

The House can impeach. However, all impeachment entails is that the House is recommending charges of illegal activity to The Senate. The Senate is the entity that determines guilt or innocent of the impeachment charges. While the House may impeach, I do not see the impeachment going anywhere in The Senate. If it does not gain approval in The Senate, the impeachment means nothing.