Muslim ER doctor charged with female genital mutilation of nine girls

It's assault... so they say assault is legal ??? Wow, I'm confused..

It's child abuse...so now they say child abuse is OK ???

 

In typical fashion people find a way to 'interpret' it from holy texts. Sadly there is no shortage of clerics to support that interpretation.

 

It is not assault anymore than a circumcision is assault. Dramatics and hyperbole do not help the matter

 

Well, in America 2018 this person was set free, now in America 2021 they are being charged again.

Do you think this person should not be charged?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
It's assault... so they say assault is legal ??? Wow, I'm confused..

It's child abuse...so now they say child abuse is OK ???

I admitted I was confused.

Genital mutilation of girls seems way more invasive and drastic than circumcision..


So raping a 7 year old girl is a crime but cutting her vagina up isn't !!!??


I find that sickening....those who do that, what primitive beasts they must be.

But I think anyone who violates a person's right to bodily autonomy is a primitive beast.

 

The judge is presuming it is legal/constitutional in the first place. It is designed prevent women from enjoying sex. BTW, I don’t see the men using cattle syringes to impregnate their females.
It’s equivalent to a man having the end of his penis amputated.

 

I agree it is way more invasive than circumcision.

It is in 43 states, but it is not the sort of thing that Congress has power over.

I do as well.

So, all parents that have their sons circumcised are primitive beast?

 

Perhaps your anger should be directed at those 7 states that do not have laws against it.

 

Nah. The procedure is 100% the result of sexist ideology that desires to remove the pleasure of sex from women as a lesser being. They want women subordinate to men to only exist for their pleasure instead of their own.

I can and will judge. That's some bullshit, and the culture needs to be criticized and scrutinized until they come out of the middle age mind set.

 

I'm pointing out that she was charged, so again, I'm not sure where you are developing all of these theories; not about the case, which you seem to have no interest in, by my view of the evidence as a basis of criminal charges.

Are you saying she should be charged or should not be charged, and should it not happen in 2021 since that appears to be a trigger for you?

 

I was being sarcastic using a liberal talking point.

 

Must be as are those who want to ban abortion (taking away women's right to bodily autonomy)

 

It amazes me that I am the only one outraged. Plus we are importing more of this type of belief from muslim countries. What’s next? Shrunken heads?

 

Yes, child abuse is okay. I was speaking with someone in Congress many years ago and mentioned that Child Protective Services is just broken. He didn't miss a beat. He said (and I quote) "Kids can't vote."

The ONLY person I ever met that actually had his kids taken away for abuse was my grandmother's second husband. He had six kids and two were female twins. He beat one of the girls so badly that he blinded her. She and her sister were taken away but the other four kids weren't if that tells you anything. As a cop, child abuse advocate and senior abuse advocate, he is the only person I've ever met that actually lost his kids due to abuse and I'll spare you the details on what depravity some adults inflect on their children and other people's kids. It's sick and nobody really cares (unless the life is in the womb).

 

Everyone in this thread has spoken out against this practice, but I am not going to blame a judge for following the Constitution even if I do not like the this

Instead I am going to wonder why 7 states do not have laws against this and since one of those 7 I live in I plan to contact my state Rep tomorrow to find out why.

 

It's a women thing.
And indeed. She could be Christian as well since it's not related to religion.

 

It's not a believe.

 

.." unless the life is in the womb"....got that right....the minute that woman is born her life isn't revered at all by Anti-Choicers...she's just cattle to them ...and radical Muslims or the slime who mutilate women..

 

They did. They passed a law:
H.R. 6100, Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/56451#:~:text=fine or imprisonment.-,H.R.,FGM of that minor, and
Currently, the FGM statute prohibits performing certain procedures—circumcising, excising, or infibulating the female genitalia of a minor—for nonmedical purposes. However, it does not define FGM.

In 2018 a federal district court invalidated the FGM statute in United States vs. Nagarwala. The court found, among other things, that the statute exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution because it (1) lacks detailed, record-based findings regarding how FGM substantially affects interstate commerce; and (2) lacks jurisdictional elements (e.g., requirements that charged offenses have an explicit connection with, or effect on, interstate commerce). In 2019, the Department of Justice (DOJ) decided not to appeal the decision.

This bill creates a statutory definition of female genital mutilation and provides explicit findings regarding the effects of FGM on interstate commerce.

The bill broadens the scope of prohibited FGM-related conduct on a minor to include

• attempting or conspiring to perform FGM;
• facilitating or consenting to FGM, as a parent, guardian, or caretaker; and
• transporting a minor for FGM.

It expressly requires prohibited FGM-related conduct to have a connection to interstate or foreign commerce.

The bill increases from 5 to 10 years the statutory maximum prison term for an FGM offense. It also prohibits a federal criminal defendant from asserting, as a defense, that FGM is required as a matter of religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice.

DOJ, in consultation with various federal agencies, must report annually on FGM, including the estimated number of women and girls at risk of or subjected to FGM and actions taken by government agencies to combat the practice.

 

I do not defend Muslims, Christians or Jews in their genital manipulation of children

let the children grow up and decide for themselves

let's be honest, this is all about reducing sexual pleasure of men and women in society.... some religious folks think sex for pleasure is evil....

 

This is normal in that culture. Restricting women’s rights isn’t enough, they also wanna make sure it doesn’t feel good
Sick!

 

”Commerce Clause.” How appropriate for an imported culture that sells and trades “tea boys” and child brides.

 

Some cultures are good, some not so good. I'm not afraid to judge. They are savage.

 

That was the argument lawyers used to allow it, but the law which I mentioned closed that loophole.

 

There are no nations in the Middle East, only tribes with flags.