That is all you needed to post. The rest of your posts follows that assessment of yours. Thanks for your confirmation that you understand nothing about the NIST reports' many deceptions that you bought lock, stock and barrel as valid. That was NIST's objective after all. And despite your claim that you understand the concept of free fall and its implication with respect to WTC7 you don't at all but you do have the right to imagine you do. You also have the right to imagine that you believe you know better than experts who blatantly contradict your fantasies. I won't waste my time with your OCT fantasies any further, your vivid imagination speaks for itself. As for the real world, we shall see if the grand jury agrees with NIST (and you) or not. That's all that matters at this point, not the imaginations of anonymous internet jockeys who believe they are experts in all 9/11 matters strictly for the purpose of defending the OCT 24/7. BTW you always have the opportunity to file an Amicus Curiae in the Southern District of New York explaining your qualifications as an expert witness in defense of the NIST reports. Good luck. If you do, please post a copy here. Thanks.