Bob-waffle. You just do not know how to debate without your passive aggression pouring out more crass observations. False. No, you are spamming already posted and responded to items. A pathetic and inaccurate claim. It is not a falsehood to claim an aircraft hit the Pentagon when we have witnesses, dead body DNA and plane parts. This is the absurd gentleman who claims he was doing walking through walls experiments? In all his years as what? He was never a crash investigator and I'm fairly sure he would not have attended a crash where the objective was to obliterate the plane in an enclosed space. How come you never respond to that MAJOR point? Anyone would think you constantly avoided things. Post 2 does it for me. Your opinion on his videos are noted and dismissed. I am amazed that you transpose the label aimed at "truth seeker" and apply it to people like Hulsey on my behalf. I await his final report and conclusions and the findings of any committee as a result. Here is some light reading for you: https://www.reddit.com/r/engineering/comments/71yw9v/nist_versus_dr_leroy_hulsey_911_megathread/ Just don't. Don't dare associate your forum posting behaviour as a so called "truth seeker" and apply it on my behalf to this guy! Bob-waffle. Tin can analogy that you were wrong about on about 3 different points and a video that you have nothing but hot air as rebuttal. Just because I don't share your rather disturbing obsession about this or developed some pre-conceived and un-wavering conclusions, does not mean I am not interested. The labels you refer to have been acquired through continual denial of evidence and points that go against the fixated conspiracy.