No Boeing 767 impacted the South Tower on 911

awe dont be so sad. Just because you cant show me not a single clip of a real plane. Maybe you will get luckier on the next false flag.

 

Still can't answer the question, lawyer-boy?

Funny, you still have and haven't debunked any of the videos.

 

this will answer your question

[video=youtube;uJcdJZfJN0Y]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJcdJZfJN0Y[/video]

 

Well, there's proof THAT person didnt see the plane. mmmmmmmmm.....so what?

Now explain how all the videos were gathered up, faked and placed on the net within a couple of day and why the people who owned the videos and photos aren't complaining? When you get done with that, explain how all of us on the ground in NYC that morning saw the planes.

**** on.

 

He didnt see "A" plane, HE SAID NO PLANE IT WAS A BOMB, and translated into debunker that means the wtc was blown up with things that explode, like bombs as an example.

so you think word games can change the facts.

The reporter tries to get people to believe pure hearsay over and above the first hand witness.

They are the complaining type. How hard is that to figure out LOL?

 

Because they are going along with the black plane hoax.

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=dro...4DABQ&ved=0CJoBELAE&biw=1536&bih=748#imgdii=_

A theory requires some purported evidence. You have posted no theories, real or fake evidence of your personal belief. The ball was captured by chopper 4, the best indication of what really happened. It was not a plane or typical drone. It was remotely controlled, but had to wings or propeller. That excludes it from appearing like the typical aircraft we are used to seeing.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNLVxWUbPDU

 

Attempting to reframe you ignorance/poor vision as something more than it is...is completely dishonest. I can see the wings on the plane....so can everyone else here.

Stick to Sunday morning cartoons.

 

Nobody witnessed a plane impact T2. It was a ball.

 

Wrong. I eye-witnessed it from two blocks away...as did thousands of other. Some even recorded it. It was tracked on radar, it was eye-witnessed from people across the river in NJ on the ground and air traffic controllers. The evidence is irrefutable.

You claim is yet, another lie.

 

You were there, Please tell me, I'm interested
what vantage point did you have, that is, were you at ground level
or up in a skyscraper & looking out the window?
and was the aircraft in your field of vision for a few seconds
+ or - .... or? I would really like to know. please elaborate upon your experience.

 

No you were not LMAO Stop it! Lets see your video proof.



.

 

Is it possible for a man to take a picture of a fake plane he didn't see?

 

if you have good enough software and media on your team anything is

possible

 

If by that you mean agree with no, however I always look. At least once.

What I post easily proves what is being told and shown to them by government media and so called expert sources is all fraudulent and or faked without their need to use too much brain power, which fits in quite well for the extent of expertise seen on internet forums.

 

Yeah, actually I was. I have no video or photos because I didnt take any. You can (*)(*)(*)(*) and moan all you wish. There were thousands on the ground that day that witnessed it. Not everyone took photos and videos. There are plenty of people who have been interviewed about what they saw, about what the videoed and photographed that day, you just choose to dismiss those statements because you are too invested in your delusional fantasy. Says so much about your ability to put two rational thoughts together to make a rebuttal.

Why is you didn't contact the woman from the blog...??? just too lazy...or just know she is going to confirm you're full of (*)(*)(*)(*)?

- - - Updated - - -

Yeah, if no one on the ground had eye witnessed or took photos or videos....but they did. You're factually incorrect.

 

Is koko still claiming the plane was 'intact' going through the wall of the tower?

 

The usual Nutter stuff. Video/photos faked, eye-witnesses lying, no planes....blah...blah...blah....

 

None of what you claim happened though,seven

Which make your claims,well,errrrrrrr....'spurious' is the polite word I can use without incurring the wrath of the moderators,I hope.

 

You really think there were no eye-witnesses?

These are all fake, right?

https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/whattheysaw:eyewitnessaccountsofthenycai

"I saw the plane come in. My office faces north. I just finished my coffee and I heard my friend say, 'Oh no, oh no.' This plane was coming right at us, then it went up and hit the upper floors. –Nicholas Scinicariello, 86th floor Source


Now, admit you are wrong or stop posting lies.

 

AA Flight 11 Approach YOU FAILED, AS ALWAYS. NOT T1, tower 2. READ THE TITLE OF THE THREAD.

No Boeing 767 impacted the South Tower on 911

 

You're babbling now,7

 

That's funny...Clifton Cloud, as pointed out to year much earlier in the thread, says you're lying. He says there was a plane. Furthermore, because one person, or people didn't see the plane due to their angle or distance doesn't prove those who did, wrong.

Honesty and logic, you're not doing them correctly.

 

Interview with Clifton Cloud:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=X09R95S3Jck


YOU'RE WRONG