Nothing African about them

You belong to the country were making a living. A place of Birth, a passport or the colour of skin won't identify the person. It is my opinion.

 

A difference exist between complaining and/or looting and burning property

 

The fact that these two remarks are within the same post is something else. It reminds me of the time that the flat earth society made a social media post about how they have thousands of members from “all around the globe”

 

Absolutely, yet it was you who suggested deporting US citizens to Africa for merely complaining.

 

I generally agree, one thing I thoroughly dislike is how election analysis divides populations by race. A person’s skin pigment does not define their decisions as an individual. But this isn’t the reality, there are still a lot of people who use skin color to distinguish others, some even do this to themselves.

Even so, I agree philosophically, however, how do we interpret the history of times when race was of utmost importance in defining where someone was in society. I don’t believe we should erase such history, and I don’t believe we are enlightened enough as a society to understand this and “get over it” simultaneously.

 

Skin color per se is a red herring (;^): people of South Indian and Australian aboriginal ancestry, for example, may also have dark to very dark skin. In this context, "African" refers to genetic ancestry in sub-Saharan Africa, not skin color. Unfortunately, because of cultural tradition, many Americans who identify (or are identified by others) as "African American" are in fact less than 50% sub-Saharan African by genetic ancestry. A substantial number are less than 10% sub-Saharan African by genetic ancestry.