NZ Pleading To The U.S. NRA/ILA Members For Assistance

Can you give me an example?

 

https://www.firearmspolicy.org/
https://www.firearmsfoundation.org/
https://gunowners.org/
https://nationalgunrights.org/

 

And what legislation have the successfully brought into passing?

 

https://www.firearmspolicy.org/legal

https://www.firearmsfoundation.org/our_work

https://gunowners.org/category/end-of-year-reports-2/

https://nationalgunrights.org/resources/faqs/

The first two mostly do cases. You can see what they've had their hands in.

Goa does all sorts of things, including funding candidates or filing cases or suggesting legislation.

NAGR mostly pushes for constitutional carry.


Why? You want to brag about the NRA having a hand in the Lautenberg amendment?
You want to brag about them begging daddy trump for the bump stock ban?
Or ERPOs?
Eh?

 

And in all but one of those cases they only filed a friend of the of court and actually had no other involvement In any of those cases.

 

READ THE *******NED LINKS. https://www.firearmspolicy.org/grewal < Plaintiff https://www.firearmspolicy.org/fpc-v-whitaker < plaintiff https://www.firearmspolicy.org/linton < plaintiff
etc.

Gosh. That only took all of a minute to both prove you wrong and mock you. Somebody call the ATF my rate of fire is too high!!

 

I thought this an appropriate place for this meme.

 

That's a really dumb meme.

 

Awwww you like it

 

Na it's poorly done, whoever produced it could have taken a little more time and maybe it might have been funny to those at level of education higher than grammar school.

Normally I ignore meme's as most of them are just shorthand for lightly educated people, but once in a while someone produces one that is really on target and like a well thought out editorial cartoon gets the point across very well.

That one failed on all counts, whoever did it either lacks basic graphic talent or was just lazy.

 

awww you don't understand the meme template is intentionally using poor grammar etc as part of the schtick.

You must be an absolute laugh riot at parties.

Any comment on LaPierre partying hard on NRA members dime to apparently include a full service girlfriend experience?
That model there was his "intern" paid at 5k a month who accompanied him on trips to places like budapest.
She's a "gift consultant " now

 

In comedy there is an old statement, "if it has to be explained, it ain't funny," that meme met that requirement.

 

So no comment on LaPierre embezzling member funds to pay a hooker then?

Pardon me, "mistress". Hookers are hourly, mistresses are salaried

 

I don't comment on Huffpo propaganda from unnamed and impossible to confirm sources.

If they actually had the documents they would have published them versus creating fake news.

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...e-lapierre-suit-travel-expenses-a8910771.html

Except they DO have the documents......

How do you think we got a look at the honey there? How do you think we know her former and current "job" titles?

Because the docs leaked and EVERYONE knows about it but you Quixote.

 

Don't see anything in your links to back up the specious claim.

I will spell it out so you can have a better idea of what the term means.

document
noun
doc·u·ment | \ ˈdä-kyə-mənt , -kyü-\
Definition of document

1 law
an original or official paper relied on as the basis, proof, or support of something

something (such as a photograph or a recording) that serves as evidence or proof

 

O how adorable
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2...r-law-firm-spending-lapierre-expense-details/

 

If those are really official NRA documents, then explain why are the phone numbers on the bottom of first page, with everything else inserted between that page and the final page, furthermore why does the NRA logo only appear on the first page only and not on any subsequent pages?

First of all those numbers would not appear on an internal document, that is something that would be sent out to membership, not used internally, that's a no brainer.

Furthermore the first page as printed is a single page, therefore additional pages would also carry the NRA emblem as well, but do not, because they where inserted into the so called evidence on plain paper, a real red flag that this document is fraudulent.

And why was the comment about Semper Fidelis added below the signature line, it would not be there unless someone wanted to hammer down a point

The answer is simple, because the document is an anti-gun fraud, someone took home, or printed at work that document and then got fired for producing it, hence the "former employee."

But not surprising considering the NRA is moving forward on destroying NY's gun registration rules and the anti's are doing all they can do to destroy the NRA credibility before that case is brought before the USSC.

It won't matter they are going to lose.

 

Dude this has been admitted to by the NRA.
You've got to take those blinders off sometime

Have a good one buddy

 

Were is that admission or are just tossing out more BS?

 

Then cite precisely where the admission has actually been made. Prove conclusively, beyond reasonable doubt, that such actually occurred.

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ad-fi...arged-them-over-dollar240k-in-travel-expenses

You gents should really read the articles. The link with all the photographs and documents is particularly revealing.

 

I have read the articles and they are nothing more than hit pieces, void of any actual facts and one you posted is based of fraudulent documents, as I already explained.

 

Jesus Christ man, those "fraudulent " documents?

THEY'RE THE ONES DISCUSSED IN THE LINK I JUST ****ING GAVE YOU AND ACKNOWLEDGED.

You want to know why I don't bother to get in depth with you? Its useless. You won't read the ****ing links.

 

And I looked at them and it is clear to anyone that they are fraudulent, why would the NRA's phone numbers be on the first page and why is the NRA emblem missing on the remaining pages.

I'll give you a clue, they are not from the NRA but produced and poorly produced in an attempt to make it look like they came from the NRA.

And then there is the tag line below the signature line which would never be on an internal document.

Your have bought into this fake news hook line and sinker and don't even realize it, or maybe you do, but that wouldn't fit the I hate the NRA narrative being promoted.