Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards s Ineligibility Damage Control

Ahh birthers. Always so gullible and so desperate to believe the Next Big Hope.

Thanks for helping Barack Obama get re-elected.

 

the credit belongs to you.

 

Don't be so modest. Birtherism probably added a percentage point to Obama's victory at least. The evidence you clung to was so obvious bollox that you tainted everyone who associated with you and helped drive away the moderates. Anyone that associated with believers in that crap wasn't worth voting for.

I had zip to do with it dude. All I did was debunk liars on a few websites. I didn't volunteer, contribute, work for or do anything else at all for the Obama campaign or for any Democrat or Republican in the election. This is all on you. Stand proud.

 

i was being fecetious. it was within the margin of corruption. one more four years isn't enough to make it to socialism.

 

Rotlol

 

does obamavich try to appeal to the lcd or does he just have bad grammar.

 

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=364103

SO even Orly Taitz thnks the "Obama is a socialist" smear is total rubbish. That's a lot of rubbish for that woman to smell it.

So, are you going to finally admit that Obama;s lawyer did not say the BC was a forgery and that you lied about it at the beginning of this thread? I know, pigs will fly before you admit to lying about anything but it might make you feel better to just admit it. Think about it. I don't care much either way.

 

[video=youtube;AAZhh2T5viA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAZhh2T5viA&feature=player_embedded#![/video]

 

what happened to all the secret evidence arpaio said he was going to release before the election?

you really have to be near brain-dead to be a birther

 

Poor birthers still haven't twigged that just because the Sheriff will give them the occasional lap dance to keep them interested, that does not mean he is going to bed with them.

 

i think obama is corrupt.

[video=youtube;OWuEd81YMa4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OWuEd81YMa4[/video]

 

what a joke

 

poor sad birthers

 

and, psr

 

it also means that the birther issue didn't prevent him from being reelected, just like obamajevich. this story won't die until the vault swings open.

 

Yeah, he said he could think. I laughed.

Anyway more nutbarry from Arpiao. BREAKING! Sheriff Arpaio - FULL STEAM AHEAD with BHO Investigation. Also, surprises are coming!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWuEd81YMa4

The breaking news is that there is no breaking news, but we will breaks some breaking news when we have some breaking news to break. But, yanno, since we have conclusive evidence that Obama is ineligible/illegal, we won't release it now, we're waiting until the right time. Of course, we've been saying that since 2008, but this time we really, really, REALLY mean it.

Also, send money, signed "Lieutentant" Zullo

 

i think when this is all said and done, i predict you and all of the other fogbow types will have done too good a job, you guys overacted. too much much ado about nothing. you set your own trap.
still, i could be wrong, but i don't think so. i think he's hiding something big. political overkill to a simple non issue.... going into the sixth year now. lol

 

So, you going to admit you lied about Obama's lawyer admitting that the BC was a forgery yet? Not to mention that you were wrong about everything else you have posted on this forum. What are you hiding?

 

i'm batman.

i think you have me confused with someone else about the lawyer forgery thing.
what i think is that the virtual pdf is a red herring. i am certainly not wrong about everything i've brought here, so much of it has yet to be determined.
but i know misdirection when i see it, and this administration is rife with it.
no, i still wonder why you all go to such great lenghths to kill this controversy, but it won't go away even with all your effort. and of corse now there is benghazi, something current that we can watch unfold and compare the birther story to.
no lies, just lot's of unanswered questions. i still think he is hiding something important in his past, that he used his office to hide, that has always been my position. what keeps all of the obots glued to the story is a bonus in studying human behavior. the obama birther controversy is far from settled.

 

only in the minds of nut cases

 

Uh. dude. this entire thread for the past double digit pages as you coming up with (*)(*)(*)(*) and having it immediately proven wrong in the next post, at which point you completely ignore the fact you have made an ass out of yourself and cover yourself with something else, which is again immediately proven bollox. Its pretty funny. and for proof the reader can just look back at any of the pages of this thread. And when you finally have nowhere to go you try and pretend you are doing some bull(*)(*)(*)(*) SAW (*)(*)(*)(*) because ooh your clever. And you have never admitter you were wrong about agreeing with the OP that Obama's laywer admitted there was a forgery

And there nothing to Benghazi. Not a single person has come out saying there is anything to it. Not even Petraus said there was anything to it after Obama had fired him. There is no evidence other than what McCain is pulling out of his ass because he does not want to be stuck just being the chairman of the committee on Indian affairs next year so he wants to invent an investigation to be chair of.

And there nothing unusual about Consulate attacks either, by the way, even though Charles Krouthhammer lied about that fact on fox. In fact a quick look at history brings us

2002: U.S. Consulate In Karachi, Pakistan, Attacked; 10 Killed, 51 Injured.
2004: U.S. Embassy Bombed In Uzbekistan.
2004: Gunmen Stormed U.S. Consulate In Saudi Arabia.
2006: Armed Men Attacked U.S. Embassy In Syria.
2007: Grenade Launched Into U.S. Embassy In Athens
2008: Rioters Set Fire To U.S. Embassy In Serbia.
2008: Ten People Killed In Bombings At U.S. Embassy In Yemen.

And Attacks On Embassies And Consulates Happened Under Other Previous Presidents
CARTER

1979: Iranians Seized Hostages After Storming U.S. Embassy In Tehran.
1979: Pakistanis Attacked And Burned U.S. Embassy In Islamabad.
1979: U.S. Embassy In Tripoli Was Attacked And Burned.

Saint REAGAN

1983: Bomb Blast At U.S. Embassy In Beirut Killed More Than 60, Including 17 Americans.
1983: Car Bomb Damaged U.S. Embassy In Kuwait.
1987: Car Bomb Exploded Outside U.S. Embassy In Italy.

GEORGE H.W. BUSH

1990: Palestinian Guerrillas Attempted To Attack U.S. Embassy In Tel Aviv.

CLINTON

1998: Terrorist Bombs Near U.S. Embassies In Kenya, Tanzania Injured More Than 1,000 And Killed More Than 60, Including Eight Americans.

You want to tell us that the President was behind all those too? In fact Benghazi looks small potatoes compared with some of those.

And the only reason there is still a "controversy" is because crazy and bigoted people cant accept a black guy is the president. And that crazy people like you keep saying 2+2= sausages despite a court flat out saying your evidence has "no probative value." A crazy person will keep saying the moon is made of green cheese no mater how many lumps of moon rock is thrown at him. Doesn't make it true.

And as for people like me, we just enjoy making people like you look stupid. Its easy entertainment, and educational when we do 5 minutes of research to debunk what you just made up. People enjoy kicking moon landing deniers around as well. There was even an episode of Mythbusters about them. It does not make it a big cover up on the moon landings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wptn5RE2I-k

According to you, the fact that Buzz Aldrin reacted proves that its a conspiracy. And the fact that there's a stupid lunatic in his face insulting him and harassing proves that there is something to it, right?

 

again, i think you have me confused with someone else. post #171. but this is a good example of obots getting worked up over a "non issue" that was supposedly settled five or six years ago. i'm just curious why. same for foggy bottombow and dr. mud goldfingers. you guys put way more energy into this i ever have.

 

I'm not the one that cares enough to run back and see where was your first post on this thread, unlike you. Note, I still haven't.

And I couldn't hear the rest over the sound of you trying to ignore being proven wrong once again.

 

that's fine, i was simply refuting your charge. hey check this out:

this is worth listening to again.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markgillar/2012/01/21/experts-debate-obamas-birth-certificate why did woodman say the whitehouse had high end scanning equipment (very expensive). why did he used "little red riding hood" as an example in his book (that sounds like fogbow humor to me). this is the kind of thing that the obots tout as fact and empirical. to me it souds like theory. woodman has declared himself winner and has retired. ivana zatkovich remember, said that the pdf had been enhanced.

why did it take so long for obama to release the long form. why all the song and showtunes about the "special waiver" to secure the copies. i still think dr. corsi's question, why is there a PDF at all ??

 

We aren't going to great lenghts to kill it. it's been dead for years. birthers are just a special kind of crazy, that we just can't help but point at and laugh.

of course it's settled. that's why you've lost 186 straight in court, why obama was on the ballot in all 50 states, and why he will start his second term in office in january. it's settled.