[video=youtube_share;65YjkvPx3bk]http://youtu.be/65YjkvPx3bk[/video] In case anyone missed it. Let's not forget one of the first things the Obama team tried to do in 2009. They did just as Obama said they would before he became President. The plan was vetoed by the Colombian Supreme Court so the empire had to cut the enterprise short. An Official US Air Force Document revealed the US was preparing to use it's newly established seven military bases in Colombia to carry out "full spectrum operations throughout South America", which includes expanding "expeditionary warfare capability" to combat "anti-US governments" and "radical populism" (most likely with proxies). It warns that the "stabilty of this critical sub-region of our hemisphere is under constant threat from anti-US governments". The obvious targets were Ecuador, Venezuela, and Bolivia.
Really?.....reasurting?..... I usually don't even blink if someone got just one letter wrong...but...
I wasn't really trying to be a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) bag, I just thought you might have time to edit it, so it's correct
I hate the edit time limitation. Anyway...I thought that south America was relatively stable compared to places like the middle east, africa, and europe.
Oh, the technical meaning of the term "stability" is quite different than the dictionary version. In Washington's language means "does not follow orders" or "not under US control." So here's prominent foreign policy analyst James Chace, former editor of the main establishment journal Foreign Affairs, who was properly using the term "stability" in its technical sense when he explained: It seems contradictory but it's not if you understand the coded language. Edit: Also, if you dont know what happenned in Chile on 9-11 1973, then this may have not explained anything.
This is the never ending narrative of the United States, always seeking power over others and lacking control of oneself. It is disgusting AND shameful.
