Oh Hillary, "You've got Jail."

Aww look its Paperlay talking about what he could never handle. Thanks for admitting that mental weakness of the Mopes.

To bad, I already knew your classification long before you ever spoke up.

 

The readers will decide where the mental weakness is. I'm content with their rendering, after becoming acquainted with our respective posts,

 

You mean like this one?

Section 1 states

1. Intending to be legally bound, I hereby accept the obligations contained in this Agreement in consideration of my being granted access to classified information. As used in this Agreement, classified information is marked or unmarked classified information, including oral communications, that is classified under the standards of Executive Order 13526, or under any other Executive order or statute that prohibits the unauthorized disclosure of information in the interest of national security; and unclassified information that meets the standards for classification and is in the process of a classification determination as provided in sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4(e) of Executive Order 13526, or under any other Executive order or statute that requires protection for such information in the interest of national security. I understand and accept that by being granted access to classified information, special confidence and trust shall be placed in me by the United States Government.

http://www.archives.gov/isoo/security-forms/sf312.pdf

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924

 

you r soooo full of it

you can't hold up ur end of a debate with me , so you try to insult me.
Sorry it didn't work, it's impossible to take somebody like u seriously enough to BE insulted
...just keep blathering on sweetie
just confirms what we think of u already

sorry I must have missed ur answer to the following questions. would u post it here again for everyone to see?

 

Oh I am to.....As they know already you come light to the game. I especially like when they get a chuckle after I help you with your token display. Truly.....if I could post up what others had said. It wouldn't take long for all to know who is the joke of the neighborhood as well as who likes to jump with the diss.

Kris Cross.....says Jump, again.

[video=youtube;010KyIQjkTk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=010KyIQjkTk[/video]

 

Which question didn't I answer.....lets see you point out which one rather than make (*)(*)(*)(*) up on the fly. You can't even talk up a good game.

So now you have been called out.

Which question wasn't answered? Lets get this over with quick like. Cmon which one?

 

Thats the one! Relevant passages underlined. All Cank's supporters need to do is read it-which is why they wont.

 

Says the insecure chap who actually imagines Hillary and the State Dept. read his posts here - and because of it are "trembling."

- - - Updated - - -

Addressed. Many times over.

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/tru...houldnt-be-charged-based-on-what-we-know-now/

 

Nor has the Ricepaper......and not even with Hillary's IT Guy and his limited Immunity.



Exclusive: Hillary’s IT Contractor Did Not Have Proper Security Clearance.....

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton entrusted her email server to an IT firm that was not cleared to handle classified materials, according to the chief spokesman for the Defense Security Service.

The DSS is an arm of the Defense Department and is the only federal agency authorized to approve private sector company access to sensitive or confidential material.

The agency reviews and approves private contractors to assure they have secure facilities and approves security clearances for employees to clear them for access to sensitive or classified materials.

Since 2013, Clinton used Platte River Networks, a small Denver-based company, to upgrade and maintain her private email server at her home in Chappaqua, New York.....snip~

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/14/e...have-proper-security-clearance/#ixzz429ybPwHK





Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/14/e...have-proper-security-clearance/#ixzz429yH5ywb

 

Its not on me that you can't figure out why Politician aides check out Political Debate sites. I just consider it one more reason why your aren't ever up on to much with Politics. This clearly shows why you don't know to much how things work with politicians.

 

Cmon now......you know how the leftness like to play with terminology then fall back on someone's spelling.

 

Bookmarked. To laugh at you later.

- - - Updated - - -

See what I mean? ^

 

don't pay any attention to what he is saying paperview
I am sure he is lying about what "other people" are supposedly saying

he'll say anything, call any name he can think of, to avoid admitting when he's wrong !

it's soooooo obvious!

 

Missed, many times over by her apologists.

*hint-read the comments in your own link. Checkmate-you just don't know it yet.

- - - Updated - - -

Its the lefty way.

 

Well you were lying Right here, when you said I didn't answer your questions. Yet can't figure out which one I didn't answer. Wheres that question I didn't answer or that you thought wasn't an answer but was?

Do you always make (*)(*)(*)(*) up when your questions get dealt with appropriately?

Its looking like you do.....so really your not off to a good start around here.

 

Checkmate????? You better keep it simple with his game of checkers.

Can you believe the mope doesn't know what Political aides do for their Respective politicians? Now that is pathetic.

 

jeeze!
this is fourth time, I've asked it of YOU
.. don't feel bad, no one else will address it either
lol

 

There certainly appears to be a lack of awareness.

 

no!
Truly
....its ur name calling that's pathetic!

love it that u guys feel u have to gang up
on him,
and confirm each other's opinions to convince urselfes that he is loosing his side of his debate with u .....
which is hysterical! he's winning, you're just too blind to see it !
lmbo!!!

 

Geez and here was the answers from post 870.....why did you miss the answers. Note your so called questions were answered.

What happened.....lookie there. You outright lied. Tried to be dishonest and now was shown to be so. All to try and give some cover to Paperlay.

 

No its Paperlays disrespect that is, whats pathetic. Which he can't even disrespect someone properly to boot.

Oh well your new.....you will learn after some time.

 

You haven't answered my question either. Please tell us, how much is the Clinton Campaign paying you to argue their talking points on the Internet?

Steve

 

When your imagined indictment doesn't come to fruition, what are you going to call it?

 

Indeed, and that's why the leftness hope the threads pages turn a few......thinking that after 5 or 6 pages of deflection that it will help their case.

Their usual.

 

Oh you didn't fall for the Independent spiel either, I take it. You will note I called it after the first few posts.