Oh Hillary, "You've got Jail."

Tell THAT to the FBI and the DoJ. You'll make them think they aren't doing their job and then it'll really tick them off. LOL

Steve

 

As I said, I was awaiting your response.

Still am.


Well what changed and your evidence of it? The only thing that changed was the inspectors were locked out and Saddam left to his own devices. So why would you assert that change was for the good vis-a-vis WMD?


What is your proof he was wrong? UNSCOM was in the process of gathering and DESTORYING WMD when they were kicked out in 1998. What happened to the ones that were left?


Correct, it didn't work and it was not a preemptive war, it was a continuation of hostilities after Saddam violated the cease fire agreement.


What fresh intelligence proved Saddam was in compliance with the cease-fire and had not active WMD or the proscribed items need to rearm?

 

Classified at birth including emails she originated.

Wrong it was for a security briefing.

AND/OR gross negligence.

It was not legal for classified information transmittal or disclosure and against a direct Presidential order to ONLY Us government servers for government business.

Yes, the crimes come under the umbrella espionage law, it's doesn't take her being a foreign spy to violate it. The jury will be instructed and not so ignorant of the laws in question.

 

"dead horse"............ROFL oh how rich that is!

Tell that to the grand jury.

 

Let me ask you, are you of the opinion that it is only wrong-doing if it is criminal? That unless there is a criminal charge everything she did was just fine and proper?

 

Lynch is shucking and jiving...
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/272360-lynch-dodges-on-role-in-clinton-probe

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/lynch-indicates-doj-not-required-to-charge-clinton/article/2585342

She's trying to interject doubt, where none exists.

Its a distraction, meant to distract leftists.

 

At least she admitted this......from your link. Pursuant to criminal cases, huh?

Again, the attorney general demurred.

"It would not be an operation of law; it would be an operation of procedures," Lynch said.

Pursuit of criminal cases is “done in conjunction with the agents” investigating the matter, she testified. “It’s not something that we would want to cut them out of the process.”.....snip~

 

I think Lynch is just going by the book, which is a good thing. Like I told "flypaper" a while back, I'm good if this thing lasts until Oct 31st 2016. It'll be good election talking points for Rs either way.

If anyone should be pressing Lynch I would think it should be dems and Hillary trying to get a statement of no indictment coming, but that would conflict with Hillary's talking points that it's just a "security review."

Steve

 

Maybe Loretta helped with that Focus, huh?

 

Doubt about what? Doubt about your conjecture and conspiracy theories? It is an ongoing investigation that can't be disclosed until it is complete. The right has convinced itself that an investigation is not necessary because they don't believe in the rule of law. They are just being the same kind of lynch mob that they've always been and are at the gate with torches and pitchforks, as usual.

 

Lynch mobs imply KKK (although you perhaps missed the pun), a democrat organization.

Im referring to the obvious felonies committed prima fasciae.

 

You mean that Lynch gave Hillary the idea that it was just a security review? Interesting thought, but I have no doubt that she now realizes that was a mistake if she did.

Naaawww, I think Hillary's talking points are her own mistake. It has the distinctive appearance of Hillary's own lack of foresight.

Steve

 

First off, the KKK holds the same values as the Right and your front runner: To Make America White again. Despite your attempt to lie about the KKK being a Democratic organization, which it is not, the lynch mob reference is to your usual BS investigations and pointless and moronic charges which turn out to be nothing.

You've got no evidence, just a bunch of BS guesses with nothing to back it up, as always. Why don't you let law enforcement and the justice system do its job instead of making a bunch of stuff up, like you have been? BTW, prima fasciae requires evidence, not internet memes and speculation. Thanks for spraying the fact that you don't know WTF you're talking about all over the internet.

 

Trump has nothing to do with the KKK and never has. His daughter and son in law are Jewish.
Your attempts to distract, though-wont work.

We know-from Hillary, Obama, the FBI, DOJ, and State what she had.

We know the laws.

We know the penalties.

The only people who haven't figured this out are lefties.

Its not so funny now, is it?

 

I've heard this all before. You don't know jack. Things you claim as facts and knowledge are nothing more than Right Wing conspiracy theories, talking points and bad speculation from your talking heads that tell you how to live your insipid little lives.

 

The Blumenthal hacker known as Guccifer is being extradited from Romania to the U.S. He is currently serving time in Romania for hacking many well-known people.

From the article:
"Sidney Blumenthal emailed Hillary Clinton at least two intelligence reports about Libya which were not included in the trove of 296 emails released by the State Department on Friday.

"Clinton has claimed that in December she turned over all official government emails she sent or received from her personal account while in office. In turn, the agency has claimed it turned all Clinton emails related to Libya or Benghazi over to the House Select Committee investigating the Benghazi attack.

"But a screenshot of Blumenthal's email inbox, which the Romanian hacker Guccifer published in March 2013, shows two reports about Libya emailed to Clinton which were not released in (last) Friday's batch."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/2001449

I suspect that Guccifer is being brought to the U.S. to testify that not all Hillary's emails were provided to the FBI by either Clinton or the State Dept. Since he has already been serving time in prison then there wouldn't be any other reason to extradite him here.

Steve

 

Sure thing, its a conspiracy.

Canks was asked tonight in the debate straight up if she would drop out of the race if indicted. She refused to answer.

- - - Updated - - -

That would make sense.

 

No I meant her excuses to Cornyn wherein she keeps reinforcing the idea that this is a criminal investigation. So she can't tell anyone anything.

 

Thank you sooooo much for exposing yourself as an absolute hypocrite. I saw the clip and she pointed out, justifiably so, that Secretary Colin Powell and the staff of Condoleeza Rice did EXACTLY the same thing. This as a sleazy attempt by Jorge Ramos to make this a continuation of the media circus about this non-issue.

If you believe Hillary Clinton should be indicted for this practice, you would have to indict the administration of the alleged War Criminal George W. Bush. Since you're not advocating for their indictment, your charges are not only baseless, they are hypocritical.

 

Then they should be investigated and if they broke the law should be prosecuted and any security clearence they may still hold be revoked and they should never again be put in a position of the public trust and national security, don't you agree?

 

Glad you saw the clip-so you saw her essentially say "They did it too" (no evidence that they had classified documents, btw), and then change the subject without answering.

BTW, your "BOOOSH!" comment is the same thing. I just want to point out (because you appear to think otherwise) that it wont help her.

- - - Updated - - -

Seems reasonable and consistent to me.

 

Due to a problem with Google Chrome browser security and a smilie a poster imported into their post I am getting a security warning and cannot pull up page 99 of this thread, and a page in another thread, if someone posted to me and it's on that page I can't read it. Try copying and pasting to another post here.