Opinions about Homosexuality

I think that Homosexuality, lesbianism, and other sexual orientation preferences must be studied before allowing more laws incentivizing their proliferation.

In my opinion, homosexuality, lesbianism and the rest of sexual orientation preferences do not contribute anything beneficial to society.

On the contrary, these sexual preferences carry the proliferation in greater percent of sexual diseases and lead to our species to extinction is everybody becomes an individual having these preferences.

I have asked several times for at least one good thing coming from homosexuality that will contribute to something favorable to humanity.

No answers were given.

In the past, the Congress made the attempt to acquire thousands of bibles in order to be distributed to Americans, because it was found that reading and learning from this book was beneficial to society.

Even today, in many polls, it has been found that religious people is in less proportion as affected by sexual diseases, divorces, and other negative aspects in our society.

Then, the question is, how beneficial is homosexuality, lesbianism, and other sexual orientation preferences to our society? In what aspect? Why it should be promoted?

I'll hope for answers be given with decency, guided to a honest analysis, opinions based on the common benefit of society in general.

My personal opinion is that homosexuality, lesbianism, and the rest of sexual preferences other than heterosexual are not beneficial but bad, harmful, hurtful, injurious to our society, besides of being unhelpful, useless, worthless for our species, and are an unfortunate and un unrewarding status in our human existence.

You might think different. I'm interested to know your opinion.

 

There are no such laws.





​

 

My personal opinion is that bigotry and hatred you're promoting is much more dangerous than homosexuality.

 

already been done.

 

Your opinion is telling openly that homosexuality is not beneficial at all to society.

Otherwise you should have at least one good thing about homosexuality, lesbianism and sexual orientation preferences other than heterosexual.

When is about promoting sexual perversion the topics are full of opinions of all kind.

When is about discussing how beneficial to society is the existence of those sexual preferences in society, then the topic is practically empty.

You have the opportunity in this topic to say something good about homosexuality but as you have nothing to show, then you just went to attacks against my person.

Hope parents are reading this topic in order to be aware that all this fuss about gays is just fake when is about being something good in society.

Children must be protected.

 

The more I read, the more I'm convinced that homosexuality is really a birth defect regarding the brain and body senses. We don't punish people for birth defects and so as long as they do not break laws or disturb the peace then homosexuals should be allowed to live their lives like anybody else. We have much more threatening things to worry about today.

 

In my opinion, your opinion is not amongst the norm or educated.

 

I never said it was, I was just saying that your attitude is much worse.

Homosexuality exists. You can't change that however much you might like to. Like pretty much everything, it's existence can cause some problems, though many of them could be eliminated or mitigated. The obsessive focus so many have simply against homosexuality is not constructive, not actually addressing any real issues and adding a few new ones on top.

 

*shrug* My opinion is having red hair or preferring chocolate to vanilla is not beneficial to society.




​

 

Homosexuality reduces the birth rate so that fewer morons are born.

 

One is left to wonder why God bothered to even mention something that did not exist, or why he decided to make people gay in the first place, let alone all the other animals that delve into homosexuality. Couldn't he have simply let all they gay monkeys die in the flood?

 

Hello cameron.

In my opinion homosexuality should be forbidden and has to be handled like crime, so a homosexual should be punished, because, it has been prooved, that most of the sexual crimes had been done by homosexuals. That doesn't mean, of course, that every homosexual is like that, but homosexuals have a bigger tendence to commit a sexual crime. Furthemore it has been prooved that homosexuality is a mental illness(http://www.fronda.pl/a/homoseksuali...cieczylo-polskich-homoseksualistow,22979.html ; Polish), which is very difficult to return to health.

Everything what I mentioned and more(there are much more these arguments against same sex marriage and no arguments for ssm) is for me enough, that I cann conclude everything in one sentence: Homosexuality has to be forbidden and hard punished.

 

I think there are too many people in the world!

Homosexuality helps cut down on the numbers and is a form of population control.

Heaven help us when science allows us to overcome that limitation.

 

Homosexuality is a genetic neurological disorder. Male homosexuality and female homosexuality are mediated by different alleles, so it is really two separate genetic disorders. The alleles of male homosexuality are mostly passed on by females, whereas the alleles of female homosexuality are mostly passed on by males. Homosexuality can and should be eliminated from the genepool by testing people for the homosexuality alleles, and applying embryo screening technology to the offspring of people who are carriers of said alleles.

The majority of homosexuals do not want to be homosexuals, to be a mind of one gender in the body of the other gender. This whole 'gay pride' crowd that has politicized homosexuality is hindering progress toward the elimination of the homosexuality alleles, and thus dooming countless more people to homosexuality.

 

What must be even worse is to be a homosexual and hate oneself for it so much that it manifests itself in bizarre distortions of genetics so as to justify virulent homophobia . Must be terrible, I really feel sorry for you and hope you will someday be able to come to terms with yourself.

Homosexuality benefits society in the most fundamental way that society can be benefited. Homosexuality enables people to be happy and promoting happiness is society's most basic and fundamental function. This is indisputable as everyone wants to be happy, even the jerkwads who want to make everyone miserable do that because it makes them happy.

 

Sooo... if an embryo has been diagnosed as homosexual, it should be aborted? Wow, what a conundrum for conservatives, homosexuals or abortions!

 

God makes some people different so he can have a reason to send them to hell after making their lives miserable by having all his acolytes torture them on Earth. Nice guy, God.

 

No one's opinion should be allowed to forbid anything and certainly opinions shouldn't say anything should be punished hard.
Now one can make the same argument, willful ignorance should be forbidden and punished hard.

 

Why does individual freedom have to provide a specific benefit to society?

And to be specific- male homosexuals tend to have a higher incident of STD's and female lesbians have a lower rate than the general population. Not that we should be legislating behavior based upon the averages- otherwise we might have to outlaw any kind of non-monogamous sex- right?

Society, rather than promoting or legislating sexuality, should stay out of all of our bedrooms.

And I reject your opinion as to what is the 'common benefit' for society. Homosexuality in and of itself is not harmful, hurtful or injurious to our society- that is entirely your moral opinion- unsubstantiated by facts.

 

Ah, I see that you are resorting to using copious sociopathic libellous false-portrayal behavior (which, by the way, is a form of trolling), and especially the libellous false-portrayal of motives (which is one of the hallmark behaviors of sociopaths), because you can not make any honest argument against my statements.

Contrary to your lies, I personally am not a homosexual; I pity homosexuals, and I have known a few of them who wish that they didn't have their condition. Also contrary to your lies, most homosexuals do not hate themself, but hate their disorder, just as people who are afflicted with cancer do not hate themselves, but only hate their disease. 'Virulent homophobia' means hating homosexuals, punishing homosexuals, and/or making them suffer, which I clearly never advocated; the accusation of 'virulent homophobia' is thus a rather extreme form of libel.

If we lived in a just society, then you would be waterboarded at 2-minute lengths for the remainder of your life for having perpetrated such extreme false-portrayal behavior, as would all other people who perpetrate such sociopathic behavior; but alas, such behavior is not even considered criminal. The penal code seriously needs to be reformed.

So what you are saying is that heterosexuals can not be happy, and that one can only be happy by being a homosexual. Good luck trying to convince the vast majority of heterosexuals and homosexuals of that. It would be pretty difficult for you to convince people that they are feeling something other than what they are feeling. But as for the 'jerkwads' who seek to make themselves happy by making innocent people miserable, I'm sure that you do indeed get much happiness out of your libellous trolling posts which ultimately serve the purpose of creating many more miserable homosexuals.

 

Are you saying homosexuals are morons?

 

Pretty sure they have. What study question are you trying to answer specifically?

Sex is a way for people to intimately connect, which makes them happy. Unlike most animals, humans have sex not only for procreation, but also for pleasure. A satisfying sex life reduces stress, which reduces chronic disease and increases efficiency. Since homosexuals can function in society without hurting other people, and being homosexual is a part of who they are and cannot readily be changed, it would do more harm than good to try to suppress homosexuality. People are, after all, much more than their sexual orientation. If they can be happy with their sex life, that frees them up to pursue meaningful things that contribute more directly to society.

In a more general sense, it is important to not punish people for things that do not harm others for several reasons. First, we have better things to do with our prison space - i.e. putting people there who are actually a threat to others. Second, everybody may find themselves enjoying something that is not popular at some point in their life, and we'll all be happier if people are generally allowed to do unpopular things provided they're not hurting anybody. This is also conducive to creativity, and self-determination is an even more basic right than free speech.

These diseases occur through promiscuous, unprotected sex, for the most part. HIV cannot make our species go extinct because some of us are monogamous. The other ones are curable or mostly a nuisance.

How was that measured?

And prison has a larger proportion of religious people than the society at large, which matters a lot more because many of those people actually hurt others.

The point should be that people are happier when they're allowed to be what they are.

 

`
Homosexuality is not dangerous.

 

Zero is a number, but this wasn't the thread for intricate technicalities.

 

It's clearly a mental disorder, but now that the mental health professions are totally cowed and have thoroughly discredited themselves by caving to political fashion you won't be seeing many 'professionals' publishing objective data or anything at all negative about the disorder; the 'professional' organizations simply won't publish it, and if they do attempt to introduce some objectivity to the issue they will promptly censor it under pressure from the media and 'activists', so don't hold your breath waiting. Pop psychology and sociology have completely taken over academia and the media. Here is just one example of how it works:

http://drtraycehansen.com/Pages/writings_notinthebest.html

Here is the agenda being followed, laid out in Guide Magazine in 1987. The patterns should look very familiar:

http://library.gayhomeland.org/0018/EN/EN_Overhauling_Straight.htm

When the APA caved to the Mau-Mauing in the early 1970's, it set the tone for the present. If you're not familiar with those events, it was where homosexual 'activists' harassed and threatened professional psychiatrists with ruining their practices and the like if they didn't remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from their manual, and the cowards caved to this pressure, and discredited themselves as 'professionals' ever after. Contrary to the propaganda claims ever since that is was all based on 'science', the actual vote clearly indicates otherwise, some 5,800 voting for the change, some 3,800 against the change, with some 10,000 not voting at all. Doesn't indicate 'science' had anything to do with the removal, does it? Of course not.

And, it's obvious most of these 'studies' that claim to confirm various assertions re homosexuality are obviously junk as 'science' as well, but few 'professionals' dare criticize them and the ridiculously bogus methodologies used in the most cited 'studies', they're more worried about their own pockets than objective 'science', so you can forget about these 'professionals' having any credibility; most are homosexuals themselves just indulging in confirmation bias and providing junk propaganda material for 'The Cause'.

And no, there is nothing 'positive' about homosexuality, it's just a successful marketing scam aimed at morons with little in the way of critical thinking skills or at sociopaths and psychopaths themselves. How many 'Rights' organizations do you know that actually holds votes on whether or not to keep kiddie rapers on 'The Team'? The ILGA held this vote after Jesse Helms held up the U.S. vote to allow these sociopaths NGO status at the UN. They only held the vote after this stink, not before, which makes it just damage control and not any genuine disgust for kiddie rapers, another example of sociopathic illness.

http://www.qrd.org/qrd/orgs/ILGA/1994/paedophilia.membership.plenary-minutes-06.30.94