Outcome of Recounts in WI, PA and MI

If you are from S. Cal, certainly you are well aware of the illegals living in your area.

By the way, you were not reported this time.

 

Schumer told F.Chuck Todd last sunday w/o using the word Filibuster when
asked by Todd about Filibustering Jeff Sessions,that he plans on vetting and
using every tool he can to challenge the Sessions nomination.
Wasn't it Schumer and Harry Reid who knocked out the Filibuster rule
about 10 years ago.After Majority leader Bill Frist retired.

 

Projecting much? Since Trump did not lose you do not know for sure.

- - - Updated - - -

Really? Who asked Hillary if she would accept the outcome of the election when she was preaching about democracy?

- - - Updated - - -

It is difficult to take clowns like Schumer seriously when they whine about SCOTUS appointments not being confirmed and then pull crap like they do. They have zero honor.

 

Yet, this recount drama is just beginning. On Monday, Stein is expected to file a recount petition in Michigan, while in Pennsylvania, the deadline for a recount has passed. Stein will have to challenge the results in court, according to The New York Times......snip~


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...ign-joins-green-party-recount-effort-n2251118


Ooopsie.....looks like she will need more money to take Pennsylvania to Court.

 

Gotta get more cash out of the rubes!

 

What the heck are you objecting to?

Read my comments for content, not what you clearly think I said that you don't agree with. I think you really do agree.

All i did is express reality that that the flawed person did manage to take a few states.

- - - Updated - - -

Would not shock me to learn it was Hillary that donated the funds to Stein.

 

She plans on getting a lot it seems. At least called Clinton's patheticness out.


Oh, and Stein is interested in other states where deadlines for recounts haven’t passed. This is just a total clown show.


Dr. Jill Stein
✔ ‎@DrJillStein
I will do a recount in any state where the deadline has not passed. Help my staff find state deadlines: http://ceimn.org #Recount2016
2:30 PM - 26 Nov 2016......snip~

 

Certainly not in all three states.

 

Wow, I'm seeing quite a few implications on this thread that Jill Stein is scamming people. I don't think that she is. She was the only decent human being running in the general election this year. I'll admit that the amount she's asking for seems like a bit too much. But you know what they say, prepare for the worst and hope for the best. It's better to have too much rather than too little. The mere fact that she's pressed for time with this recount, might imply that extra money is needed to hire more staff to get it done in time.

 

California has the highest Latino population in the country with over 15 million Latinos living there. That state has a much higher popular vote for Hillary despite Obama winning 92% of his party there in 2012. Illegals do not need to register. They just need a signature. We saw Obama asking illegals to vote and they only need a signature to do so. It is very reasonable to assume Hillary did not get the popular vote due to California voter fraud. Good points Robert.

 

Let's remember 6 of the main states Hillary won has a Latino population of over 1 million people and she had a high % of Mexicans and illegals voting for her. The woman in the video Obama asked to vote for Hillary was an illegal. I'm sure she voted and many more.

If you remove the illegals or even just not count latino voters in these states I wonder what the outcome would have actually been for Hillary? California, New York, Illinois, New Jersey, Florida, Colorado, Texas and Arizona.

Illinois was actually pretty much all red except for Cook County where Chicago is. How many illegals do you suppose live in this sanctuary city that voted?

 

Obama Administration: No One Hacked The Election; ‘The Will of the American People’ Was Reflected.....


As Green Party candidate Jill Stein plans to file petition to recount the votes in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, the Obama administration has come out to say unequivocally that the election was no hacked, and that the “will of the American people” was reflected in the results, according to The New York Times. Stein’s recount effort is grounded in allegations, very shoddy ones to be exact, that machines were hacked, which was exacerbated by an article in NY Magazine. Keep in mind, there’s zero evidence that any hacking occurred as well.

The publication added that no increased cyber activity was detected on Election Day, and that Stein’s recount challenge has to wait until Monday to be filed, so be on the lookout for that development. In Pennsylvania, Stein will have challenge the Pennsylvania result in court, as the deadline for a recount in the Keystone State has passed:


[In Michigan, Ms. Stein must wait for a Monday meeting of the state’s Board of Canvassers to certify the results of the Nov. 8 balloting before filing for a recount. In Pennsylvania, where paper ballots are used only in some areas, election officials said that the deadline to petition for a recount had passed, but that a candidate could challenge the result in court before a Monday deadline.

The recount efforts have generated pushback by experts who said it would be enormously difficult to hack voting machines on a large scale. The administration, in its statement, confirmed reports from the Department of Homeland Security and intelligence officials that they did not see “any increased level of malicious cyberactivity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on Election Day.”]


Again, folks; Trump won the election. There’s no way recounting the votes will determine voter fraud. It’s incredibly difficult to rig an election in the manner liberals are hypothesizing. And it doesn’t negate that fact that Clinton lost because Trump drive up the margins in the rural counties, millions of Obama supporters flipped for Trump, and that Clinton couldn’t get the Obama coalition that dominates the urban areas excited enough for them to turnout in droves like in 2008 and 2012. Why? Because Hillary Clinton isn’t Barack Obama and Democrats learned the hard way that their eight-year honeymoon was only made possible because they had a solid candidate. Clinton is one of the worst candidates to ever be nominated by a major party; she was under FBI investigation when she won the primary contest. Going from a charismatic, vibrant black president to…Clinton? Yeah, SNL had it right for that opening skit with host Dave Chappelle. Of course, no one was excited for Clinton. That’s why they stayed home in Flint, Detroit, and Milwaukee. It seems we’re still months away from the “Clinton sucked and that’s why she lost” stage of the grief process on the Left......snip~

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...of-the-american-people-was-reflected-n2250927


You know its time to give up, when BO the peep wont stick up for anyone.

 

Let's see what Wisconsin officially has to say.

http://elections.wi.gov/node/4436

 

I have long believed that in CA, illegals vote. There can be no doubt the illegals were shown the video of Obama urging illegals to vote.

I was asked by the Alameda County Voter registar office to be a poll worker. I had a fun talk with the person calling me.

I asked her the process to block illegals from voting and she said that peole wanting to vote must swear they are citizens.

Well, that is all they need to do? You mean they must lie?

Nah, people won't lie, will they? Then Obama urges illegals to vote.

- - - Updated - - -

Jill Stein was so far behind, she has no chance of overtaking either Hillary or Trump.

 

I was just referring to Pennsylvania where she has only has till close of business tomorrow to convince a State Judge of probable cause. She better get one helluva sympathetic judge because there were no reports whatsoever of suspicious polling activity in Pennsylvania. Combined with that PA uses machines which do not connect to the net she does not have crap for probable cause

 

Which is why she should be forced to reveal where she is getting her money. Follow the money and find the slugs that left the slime tracks.

 

How they slow it down is by starting legal challenges to how they are counting like Gore did.

- - - Updated - - -

If they don't get a recount in Pennsylvania then Trump finishes the line with 280 If there are now currently six faithless voters that will not vote for Trump so that means he could cross the line with 274. The whole idea here is to cross December 13 forcing Trump to cross the line with less than 270 votes.

 

I don't know yet if Wisconsin has already submitted it's electors to the Archives or not. Do you know?

 

Yes but the recount takes them back out.

 

More light on this topic

http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/the-electoral-college.aspx

 

Didn't it take longer than a year to recount florida, after gore lost to bush? How would this be faster?

 

I did read your comments. If you think we agree then perhaps you can further explain your position.

 

A. Do you accept my contention that a flawed person won 14 states?

B. Do you accept that Hillary is flawed?

 

Of course they would.How else could a state certify a vote.Electors are known
even before voting begins,anywho.I Think Trump should make a huge fuss over
California and demand a recount there.That'd teach these scumbag Dimocrats.
In fact there is already a web site and Organization out releasing the names and
address and phone numbers of Electors.Targetting states like Georgia.

 

It took around a month.Every time Gore was behind in the count he kept up
with different recount lawsuits.Gore was NEVER ahead in the vote count ... EVER.
He remained a sore loser for years.