I am not a supporter of Obama, so unless you have an actual rebuttal, you should simply cease replying.
I have to wonder what these people would fixate on if it weren't for the old "racism" accusation, that trusty old liberal stand-by. Would they be faced to debate issues and avoid the ad hominem, ad infinitum?
Pelousy has never engaged in thoughtful discussion. She is a race-baiter/race-hustler and a demagogue. Nothing more.
Actually I have a few adjectives that are apropos, though for the sake of forum rules, I'll not share.
A girl at work told me Trump hated blacks back when he first announced his run. When I asked her why she would say that, she said it was because his dad was in the KKK and got arrested for a fight outside of his home. I had to Google it and it was something that happened in the 20's and he had been later released for not being involved. They always tell me how you would have to be a racist to overlook a racist. It's funny because the most racist people in politics are always overlooked by those telling me I'm the racist, or Republicans are the racists.
Obama left Trump with the same two wars as Bush left Obama. Also Libya, Syria, and Yemen. Rebut or scut.
Pelosi needs to go. The Democrats need to clean house and come up with fresh blood. Unfortunately, I don't see it happening.
Figures. They're a bunch of indoctrinated, low-info voters who deflect through constant projection onto their designated enemies, the dreaded stupid, racist, violent conservatives. They themselves embody everything personally that they accuse others of being/doing. - - - Updated - - - That would be akin to admitting fault, wouldn't it? They're the always-right, never-can-do-wrong party of good intentions and unintended consequences hampered by their hated evil opponents, the Republicans.
I've asked a few of my family members and friends to give me some examples of Trump's "bigotry". Not one of them could give me one instance, that was backed up with proof, of this. Maybe you can?
If Trump was a racist he would be siding with the party of the kkk, the same party that has turned back race relations to the worst in my life and no matter what the debate might be about, its always the same old garbage, you're a racist, bigot, homophobe, islamaphobe and no ones falling it for anymore. No matter how hard the libs try to stick the right with their history it keeps blowing up in their faces. All of the comments here just prove how Trump was elected. The American people have been awoken and have been forced by their own moral compass to strip as much power from the left as possible. I know many democrats that voted for Trump and don't know one person who thinks Trump is perfect but with all of the insane antics the left and of course their media have tried to pull, they still could not stop people from seeing how bad liberalism has been over the past 8 years. The more unhinged they get, the more people want to distance themselves from this fanatical madness.
What? Why would they want to emphasize that he is a Muslim responding to the Trump Ban on Muslims®? What could possibly be the reason for a Muslim to respond to the Trump ban on Muslims? I mean is there any benefit to having a Muslim respond to Trump's ban on Muslims? What makes a Muslim's opinion on Trump's Ban on Muslims carry more weight than say, someone who isn't being singled out for their religion?
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-senate-trump-cabinet-20170201-story.html I think the Dems have some free time on their hands ...
You're trying to convince bigots that their bigoted. Good luck with that... "It's not like he's lining those sand-(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s up and shooting them or nothin'! What's the problem?" ~ Joe Bigot.
Ku Klux Klanners, neo-nazis, and other white supremacists are on record as endorsing and supporting Trump. Normally, such extremists never endorse or support any main stream candidate, but Trump clearly has a special allure for them. It's entirely understandable that Trump would not want to openly boast of the unique attraction that he has for them.
Funny how that works. Nobody(liberals) seem to accuse Apple execs of being semi-slave owners, yet look at who they hire to make iphones and that actually IS their decision! Nobody accuses the Starbucks CEO of bigotry when one of his employees writes rude things on a coffee cup. Dont' CEOs own EVERYTHING that is done in one of their companies=) But Trump is solely responsible for that B.S. 40 yrs ago.?? Liberal hypocrisy.
Who else is he banning from those Muslim nations; Zoroastrians? - - - Updated - - - I guess this bears revisiting; just so there's no misunderstanding Mr.Trump: http://time.com/4508889/presidential-debate-1970s-bias-donald-trump/ - - - Updated - - - My pleasure:http://time.com/4508889/presidential-debate-1970s-bias-donald-trump/
Except it was not for political gain. President Trump did not gain one democrat vote because of that.
None of the predominantly Muslim nations Trump targeted produced a single terrorist that traveled to the US and perpetrated a terrorist act in the past forty years. The probability is overwhelming that his discrimination has not inconvenienced a single terrorist, but many innocent Muslims.