Pennsylvania judge halts election certification amid mail-in vote fight

It's not a done deal. The president of Mexico is even refusing today to accept Biden as president because he knows the evidence against Biden is stacking up.

 

Where are you getting those numbers?

Here is the OFFICIAL Vote from the City of Baltimore.

Biden 207,260 87.8%

Trump 25,374 10.7%

https://www.politico.com/2020-election/results/maryland/

Are you making those numbers up out of thin air?

That sounds like some real "airtight evidence"..

 

Yep... Biden is already illegitimate, he was elected by the mainstream and social media which openly joined his campaign and lied to the american public which amounted to billions in illegal in-kind campaign contributions.

If the courts confirm that massive fraud to cheat Trump out of his presidency did take place, it will be the last nail in the already well sealed coffin of Biden's presidency. LOL

 

Where did you get that data from? I want the data that shows the spikes came from liberal areas. Also show me when counting stopped on election night and at what time when the data spikes occurred in the early morning hours?

Republicans won the registration battle reducing the Democrats registered voter lead in PA. No city there would be so one sided against Trump.

It takes hours to count that many votes unless you cheat.

So you are telling me that Biden who could not get over 1,000 viewers for his Thanksgiving day live a dress got 80 million votes? That's funny.

 

Bingo, I was actually looking for this information. For once you made yourself useful. LOL

Trump got 10% in Baltimore.
Trump got 0.5% in the midnight 600,000 ballot dump in Pennsylvania.

Trump got 20 times less vote in that totally irregular PA ballot dump than he got in Baltimore... If someone has any doubt that it was fraud, he/she is just not intellectually honest.

 

So according to you Trump took over 25,000 votes in a Democratic city of Baltimore.

If true explain how he only got 3,200 votes out of 600,000 votes in PA? According to you one of the most liberal cities is not even that one sided.

You just proved Borats point. Good job.

 

And?

You could probably find 70 Million people who believe that the Moon Landing was Faked. Big Whoop.

Just getting rid of Trump (An IMBECILE who was a Disgrace to the office) is enough for me.

If I have put up with the Birthers, Flat-Earthers, and the "We Wuz Robbed" crowd for the next 4 years it will be a small price to pay to get rid of Trump.

That said, I am still absolutely stunned that people actually existed who thought that Trump actually had a chance to Win.

Most Trump supporters that I know (which, believe it or not, is quite a few) KNEW that Trump was going to Lose--But, they voted for him anyway.

Nobody that I knew who supported Trump actually thought that he was going to win.

That is why I find myself puzzled by so many people (apparently) being surprised by Biden's Landslide Victory.

Go figure.

 

Before you me or anyone else of amateurism you better get true numbers which statistically are virtually not going to be exactly 600, 000 for a group of districts nor will there be any one district that has exactly 10,000 or exactly 15,000. You need to get the true facts about this mythical 600,000 reporting number. As I said not at all reasonable that any combination of districts will will have exactly an number such as 600, 000 votes for one candidate.

BTW the city of Philadelphia voted at a 82.21% at 604, 175 for Biden. Trump got 17.86%, at 138,870Jorganson .65 % and write in .28%. That is city wide with all 1703 divisions reported. The total allots cast was 749,317. Registered voters were 1,129, 308.
So out of the 604,175 votes for Biden if a group of divisions which were inner city minority and that group amounted to a number about 100,000 ( not reasonably likely to be exactly 100,000 ) it is reasonable and logical that Trump only got only say 2-3% for that group.

You do not have any clue if that 100,000 so called spike number is real. It logically appears to defy probability that it was exactly 100,000 and you know it. What you appear to lack is the numbers of the divisions, city, or combination of cities where that the mythical 100,000 come from.

So instead of admitting that you do not have a clue of what makes up the mythical exact 100,000 "dump" of votes but you instead attack me and call me amateurish. You also have no logical explanation nor evidence that there was a "dump" of exactly 100, 000 from a combination of divisions. That must be because you are not capable of supporting your position and you apparently are not capable to challenge my logic.

You want debate fine debate using facts and do it honestly I am not here to play your silly little games of trying to find or create an explanation to support some phony made up crap of an allegation of fraud.

Stay honest, stay real, or stay the hell out of debating.

 

Oh? Ok.

The conspiratorial "talking points" have gotten so garbled that people don't even know what state they are talking about?

Thanks for making my point.

And, This Part:

"he only got 3,200 votes out of 600,000 votes in PA"

^And, THAT "claim" has been 100% PROVEN (and validated and accepted in a Court of Law)?

Please show me the DOCUMENTED PROOF.

I am sorry that I missed that.

Please post the PROOF of that "claim".

I'll wait.

 

It's not mythical. Dominion could easily make up 2 million or 20 million votes if they wanted to and of course they had to add a few to Trump to try and hide the spike.

 

No what you need to do is show me that was a spike of exactly 100,000 and that Trump only got .2 %. We had some video of some guy claiming that there was a 100,000 vote dump exactly 100,000. Show me what divisions what city did the mythical "dump" come from.

 

You can research the data yourself and yes all evidence is coming. Over the next week or two everything will be public and Biden will be done.

 

749,000 voted in Philadelphia, Trump got 18% of the vote... but in one huge 600,000 ballot dump from Philadelphia Trump got 0.5% of the vote? are you for real? Not even 2-3% that you say is realistic but 0.5% - one half of one percent? Who are you kidding, dude?

Do you even realize that among the remaining 150,000 ballots that were not in that suspicious dump Trump would need to win 135,000 (90%) to actually get to 18% overall score. Really?

 

Oh?

Thus, you are ADMITTING that there is NO PROOF.

Thanks for making my point.

.

 

Me being a huge cynic, I suspect that the justice system in the involved states are too invested at this point to back down now and admit that the corruption that they just 'discovered', was allowed to happen beneath their very noses . . . somehow unseen. So I really do think that they are going to finish giving it to Biden and then just hope to brazen out any and all post mortem investigations. Since the Biden DOJ and FBI will not WANT to find anything . . . nothing will be found.

 

Oh, Really?

Post the Absolute PROOF of your "claim".

And, this "claim" has all been validated (and accepted in a Court of Law)?

Hopefully it isn't just "something you read on the internet".

You have absolute Proof of your "claim". Do tell.

 

No! He who makes the allegation that there was a data dump of exactly 100,000 spike must show the source and the facts. You do realize that it is virtually not probable that any combination of voting divisions will come out to such an even number. You also must realize that there is very improbable that was a voting district would have a count of exactly 100,000 votes much less for one candidate.

An exact 100,000 spike is so unlikely that I do not believe anyone who Ames that claim.

 

I don't know why this is a surprise to you. They told you this is what was going to happen.
The Trumpers of course believed Trump when he said mail in was screwed up so they voted at the polls (or stayed safely at home) while the Dem embraced mail in and jumped all over it.
So once in person votes were counted in a state like Pa. where they counted mail ins second, all that is left is Democrat votes. To add insult to injury the high population cities are heavy for the Dems anyway.
But by all means keep searching for another explanation if it makes you feel better.

 

What would you consider absolute proof?

 

If it comes from Rachel Maddow. Alt left radicals only listen to that dude

 

"Research the data"?

Do you have a link that is actually from a reliable and respected authority?

And, isn't just "some guy on the internet"?

 

A "claim" has all been validated (and accepted in a Court of Law)

 

I don't know where you got your data since you have no link, but a lot of places reported votes by candidate.

 

Trump got more than 0.5% from democrats, from minorities, from females, from ghettos, he got more than 0.5% from people who are simultaneously black, female, homosexual and disabled, he got an order of magnitude more than 0.5% from absolutely any segment of the population. Finding a group of 600,000 people anywhere on the planet that would give Trump 0.5% of the vote is absolute impossibility. Be honest with yourself pls, you're certainly not fooling us.

 

I do not believe you or anyone else that there was a 600,000 ballot dump. Show me the facts and show me what the exact process of ballot reporting is.

All we have is some video from a conference where Giuliani a completely discredited Bufoon is at that claims there is a ballot dump that appears fraudulent. Again you present no facts just allegations and hyperbole of fraud.