Poll about JFK Assassination: Who Killed JFK?

Discussion in 'JFK' started by usda_select, Mar 21, 2017.

?

Who Killed JFK?

Poll closed Sep 21, 2017.
  1. Lee Harvey Oswald; acting alone

    37.0%
  2. Lee Harvey Oswald was the trigger man; but as part of a larger conspriacy

    40.7%
  3. Lee Harvey Oswald was one of multiple triggermen.

    22.2%
  1. Blaster3

    Blaster3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Messages:
    3,710
    Likes Received:
    2,520
    Trophy Points:
    113
    seems voting's over, not that the choices are any good, and not about to skim through 35 pages of theories here, i'll just toss in my two cent... sam giancana, why? because johnnie's daddy paid him to rig the votes to get his son elected, afterward, daddy renegged on his promises...
     
  2. EarthSky

    EarthSky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2018
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    None of the above.

    Oswald was probably a patsy. The Warren Commission findings are easily proved impossible.
     
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2018
  3. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,492
    Likes Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    63
    the winner of this thread.yeah the OP is clearly biased the fact he left out that option.:rolleyes:
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  4. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,575
    Likes Received:
    2,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There has never been any evidence shown that the findings were impossible.

    He acted alone
     
  5. EarthSky

    EarthSky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2018
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I can literally prove the WC findings impossible in two minutes.

    If you believe he acted alone and have no further questions about what happened, you don't understand the facts surrounding the assassination.
     
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,575
    Likes Received:
    2,463
    Trophy Points:
    113

    I understand the facts far better than you do.

    You cannot prove or even offer any evidence to refute the warren commission conclusion
     
  7. EarthSky

    EarthSky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2018
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I already have disproved the WC findings in another thread.

    Clearly you do not understand the facts at all.

    It is impossible that one bullet accounted for all the wounds to Connelly and Kennedy apart from the massive, fatal headwound.
     
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,575
    Likes Received:
    2,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You never have in fact done so in any thread which is why you can only make such claims without a shred of evidence.

    I understand the facts far better than you do.
    No only was it possible for one bullet to cause such wounds the evidence proves that it did. Such multiple wounds from one bullet are not uncommon in battlefields worldwide and the wounds line up.

    You are quite wrong
     
  9. EarthSky

    EarthSky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2018
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I provided definitive evidence. Connelly said to his dying day that he was not hit by the same bullet and the Zapruder film proves this is true.

    Look again the supposedly hit Connelly emerges from behind the traffic sign after Kennedy has clearly been hit in the throat still holding his stetson in his supposedly shattered right wrist.

    Then you can clearly see where Connelly gets hit well after Kennedy has slumped into Jackie.

    I think all I am going to get is denial from you but the facts are there

    Go refresh yourself with the thread I started in conspiracies if you are interested.
     
  10. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,575
    Likes Received:
    2,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You provided no evidence at all and your statements are false.

    Connally only made such a claim one time while recovering in the hospital from surgery and it was not a definitive opinion nor could it have been definitive when he was hit in the back.

    The Zapruder film shows or proves no such thing in any way shape or form whatsoever.

    That thread has been massively debunked with facts as your claim here has been proven false.
     
  11. EarthSky

    EarthSky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2018
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Lol, nobody has debunked that thread and you are just denying reality for whatever reason.
    Not sure what your agenda is in parroting impossible conclusions of the WC but you come off as a bot or troll not willing to actually debate facts but just repeating the same thing over and over.

    Both Connolly and his wife held to their story to the end the Zapruder film does not lie.

    WC findings are impossible.

    This is a waste of time.
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  12. EarthSky

    EarthSky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2018
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Connally and his wife admitting it was not the same bullet on Larry King:



    Same story they stuck to to the very end

    Connally holding a stetson in the the same wrist supposedly shattered by the same bullet that hit Kennedy in the throat:

    [​IMG]

    you were saying...........
     
  13. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,575
    Likes Received:
    2,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I did say it.

    he would not know as he was shot in the back

    You still lose and have offered no proof.
     

Share This Page