Pro-Trump Group Takes Credit For Video About Eating Babies At AOC Town Hall

Is this a dirty trick? How obvious was it? Will it backfire now that it's been found out?

 

She doesn't eat babies, that is absurd. She just does not care if you do...….

 

Actually it was a Swedish climate change activist scientist who suggested we start eating babies to save the world.

In the meantime the upcoming star of the Democratic party, Ocasi-Cortess is still trying to figure out what the purpose of a garbage disposal is for.

 

It’s always ironic that the right — screaming fake news — is always the main perpetrator behind actual fake news.

 

LaRouche PAC is hardly the "right." They've been doing this type of satire for years. The tragedy is that AOC said nothing - why didn't she proclaim that eating babies was absurd. But if you do pay attention to the global warming alarmists there is a certain fraction of them that are Malthusians and actually advocate for population control by government.

 

They're hardcore Trump backers now. They say so themselves. Sure, they could change next week, but right now, they are Trump backers. Trump backers tried to pull this scam. That's not debatable. You were fooled by the scam. Now you're making excuses.

Because it's not necessary to lecture mentally ill people in public. Any honest person knows that. You're pretending not to know it, because it's how you play your part in pushing this fake news scam.

 

So what ??? AOC is a joke.

 

AOC is now one of the most well spoken members of Congress. This last hearing on Mueller proved that. The Republicans were so badly prepared that they all looked like a HS Football team suddenly called upon to sub for the Debating Club, AOC in stark contrast was informed and articulate with clear and concise questions none of Trump's Toadies could well answer.

All the cons are showing their true colors now by unloading their full artillery on new and inexperienced young women like AOC and Greta the Thunderer, and the young women are displaying their true mettle by showing the cons up for the doddering old fools they are.

 

Funny

 

She is an idiot who believes the worl will end in 12 years.

 

Or just thinks she can win votes by saying it

 

Better to be poorly versed in one's wisdom than well spoken in one's folly.

 

And the leadership of the DNC and the MSM said AOC is the upcoming star of the Democratic party.

They said the same thing back in 2004 about Barack Obama.

They said the same thing about Hillary Rodham Clinton in 1992.

They even said the same thing about Jane Fonda in 1972.

They said the same thing about Hồ Chí Minh in 1968.

Definitely a pattern with the Democratic party.

 

AOC has both. The worst part is that Trumpers call her a "Manchurian Candidate," criticizing her for using her Congresswoman's budget to hire knowledgeable people to actually research her job instead of financing dangerous fact finding missions to such international crisis areas as Hawaii and the Cote d' Azur like good Trumper Toadies do.

 

She's never said that and your thinking she did shows a lack of facts one could call idiotic itself. She agrees with many climatologists that 12 years is all the time we have left to avoid reaching "tipping points" which will mean that disastrous global warming can no longer be prevented

 

And definitely a downhill trajectory.

 

And consequently the world will end. Absurd.

 

it will be interesting to see if she is re-elected.

 

Yes, but she thinks it's a winning strategy, or her money tree is telling her it is

 

Once again, nobody has said that, and thinking someone has only shows how factually challenged most AGW deniers really are. Noone has ever said that global warming will cause the end of the world. The Earth's climates are far from constant, they have warmed and cooled nearly constantly throughout its long history, and if it warms as much as AGW predicts the overall effect on the life of the Earth will possibly be beneficial. AGW's threat is mainly and majorly to humankind, for the change predicted is greater than any that mankind has yet experienced and will be faster too. The upheavals this will produce on an Earth already greatly overpopulated and on the verge of several other crises for that reason will nearly certainly be greater than any people have yet experienced and probably cause a new Dark Age, which it will be very difficult to recover from as the climactic changes will be ongoing. In all of recorded history humanity as a whole has experienced only one global Dark Age that we can be sure of. Do we really want to be known as the people who started another because we were too short sighted to switch fuels?

 

That tree must be rather sparse, She won her primary despite the incumbent outspending her by 18-1

She is from a district that is solidly Democratic and has been for a long time. She won by taking a seat from another Democrat who was not doing what the constituents wanted and what she has been doing has met with solid approval, despite her being against Amazon's offer of jobs, jobs, jobs for tax breaks, tax breaks, tax breaks,. There are no Trumpers in her district to speak of, I think she will be there for some time to come and may be President in 2028.

 

At some point you are going to have face the facts that Global Warming is a myth. There is no such thing as climate change. It was invented by brilliant leftists after World War II in an effort to cripple the US economy and bring the United States down to its knees. Ultimately, it was intended to destroy our nation from within. Obama and other presidents were able to capitalize on this plan by issuing thousands and thousands of restrictions on our energy sector. Obama issued over 4000 regulations during his term. These measures effectively hobbled a core component to our nations economy. With Trump in office, we are seeing those "self imposed sanctions" lifted / removed and the result is a booming economy. Do humans have an impact on the environment? Of course we do. But climate changer people simply suffer from black and white thinking. It's all or there is nothing. Of course we do damage to our planet. But our planet was almost meant to be inhabited, wouldn't you say? There is no risk of overpopulation. ZERO RISK. Inevitably this leads to eugenics and abortion. Two very ugly subjects. We cannot take human life into our own hands. This means abortion is wrong and should be treated as murder. In any event, that's a conversation for another debate. Point being, Humans are not responsible for, and therefore not beholden to, climate change. The earth goes through natural cycles. Its a scam, just like the impeachment hoax going on right now. I predict big changes for the democratic party after the upcoming election

 

You just said again. ^^^^ Absurd.

 

I never heard of AGW until after 2000.

I think you are going to be very surprised by the changes after 2020. America is not populated entirely by ignorant rednecks who think science is a plot by the devil and his "pointy-bearded perfessors" to make us all believe in evolution, stop listening to Pat Robertson and not keep our women barefoot and pregnant by law.

 

Once again I am skewered by the concise facts, scholarly erudition and rapier wit of the typical conservative argument, I must now slink back to my lair and continue plotting the downfall of Democracy