Purge the resistance

I hope you realize that none of that is not going to save Trump

Republicans had the House, Senate, Congress and Supreme Court for 2 years. And they didn't impeach Biden.

Now it's Trump's turn. He's the one being impeached. And he has been proven a criminal. And, just in case, more evidence keeps coming out every day. Because Trump keeps committing criminal acts every day.

 

Yay! One state functionary destroying another state functionary. What a great day!

 

The facts result in no need to save Trump.

Nothing can be done without 60 votes in the Senate. Why would anyone waste time impeaching a VP ?? Why didn't the Obama DOJ look into the bribery which Biden admitted to ??

Your last paragraph is completely untrue. But it is amusing.

 

Go for it!

But right now Trump is the one being impeached. And even though there is more than enough evidence for removal, and zero... let's not even say "evidence"... even so much as an "indication" of something that would exonerate him. Every single piece of evidence in existence condemns Trump.

 

Are you dangling the prospect of a state functionary being punished for violating the rights of their fellow humans in front of me? Like a treat?

 

Hunter Biden will be subpoenaed in the Senate trial. Without hearsay evidence that career US diplomats were uncomfortable there is no "evidence".

 

67, actually.

I listed the several "defenses" of Trump here. That is listed under "...might save Trump". But there is a catch...

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...save-may-save-and-will-not-save-trump.564806/

Bingo! Bingo! Bingo!

And the next question: why would a President "waste time" looking for dirt on a former VP?

 

Wheee! A state functionary is going to be set upon by other state functionaries?? Fantastic.

 

You've been with these one-liner empty responses to my posts for several days now... Are you harassing me? I'm just asking because... I don't really mind if you are harassing me and you're a good looking lady. But if you're a dude, I would ask you to lay off, please. Not my thing....

 

If Justice Roberts finds that it's relevant in Trump's impeachment. I don't see the relevance. Even if Hunter had acted criminally (despite the fact that he wasn't even in a position in Burisma involved in the corruption investigation), that does not exonerate Trump.

 

I'm not harassing you, in particular. I just love when state functionaries are attacked by other state functionaries.

 

Does that mean you're harassing me in general? As part of some group of "harrassees"?

 

I'm not harassing anyone, in general or in particular. I just love it when state functionaries are attacked by other state functionaries. It's kind of like watching one paramecium kill another paramecium.

 

You can’t pass anything in the Senate without 60 votes. 67 are required for impeachment.

Burisma is one of the most corrupt companies in Ukraine which is the most corrupt country in Europe. Trump has no need for additional compromising information on Biden. Rumor has it that Corn Pop has some embarrassing information on Sleepy Joe.

 

Investigation of corruption. Trump told Levensky that he was surrounded by the same corrupt people that were in the previous government.

 

Well... you can lay off now. Nobody seems interested.

 

Cool hatchet job of my post, bro.

As I said, I love when those who want to initiate violence against their fellow man are set upon by others of those who want to initiate violence against their fellow man. It's kind of like they're clearing the decks for the rest of us civilized folk.

 

Nope! 67 votes are required for removal. For impeachment a simple majority in the House is the only requirement. And in this administration McConnell can pass anything he wants passed with less than 60 votes. Even the confirmation of a Supreme Court Justice. How many votes anything takes has now been hijacked by McConnell who applies it at will.

"Rumor"? Well... not "rumor" but known verifiable fact has it that any American who cares to look will see clear unequivocal criminal information about President Sharpie. And I don't call it "embarrassing" because a sociopath is incapable of feeling "embarrassment".

But you can prosecute Biden later, if you want. Right now it's Trump who is being impeached. And Biden's embarrassment is not going to save his ass.

 

It's so much more fun to mock the House Speaker for being an absolute idiot. Despite what Liberals believe, conservatives are not "wedded" to Donald Trump. They won't "turn on him", but they won't turn away from actual evidence either. What that means, is if Pelosi had a brain and actually took her job seriously, when/if Trump actually breaks the law, she'd have been able to muster the votes.

But now that the House Speaker pulled this stunt, she weakened impeachment powers as I have argued to give them to the Senate. I mean, well done, is there anything else for nihilistic destruction today?

Dems showing that they failed to lead in 2010, and the people were correct with their decision. If not for the ambiguity of the Mueller Investigation, there was zero reason to give Dems any leadership power back.

 

What a spectacle!

 

Maybe so, but it would never beat impeaching the President for being an absolute criminal.

That's fun!

(NB: not really. It's actually a national tragedy to have to do that. But, it must be done when the crimes are this flagrant)

 

Great! Oh... that's wonderful news! Because all he has to do now is release the complete transcripts of all the calls showing that, and allow all his close collaborators to testify, under oath, that that was his mindset. And voila! He has proven his innocence.

See? It wasn't that difficult, was it? Now, can you please point me to where I can sign up to attend Trump's next rally after he does all that?

 

I hope the statists who try him find him not innocent. Statist consuming statist. It's the best thing ever.

 

He's such a criminal that the DOJ refused to participate in this farce, having reviewed all of the available evidence.