Rep. Gosar is censured over an anime video showing him killing AOC

But he did post an image of bloodying up AOC. Did Waters do that? No.

No, the issue is more than that, because the offending video depicted AOC bloodied as Titan and Gosar as the good guy.

That might give some crazy people some crazy ideas. Crazy **** like that has happened in the past, it could happen in the future.

 

Yeah, and Al Capone was never convicted of murder.

Great logic, and we saw what Trump did, the lies he told how those lies caused an angry juggernaut that erupted on 1/6

We saw him do this for months, whipping the crowds and unleashing them on 1/6.

Even Mafiosi types never tell someone to 'murder so and so'.

You cannot deny what we saw, but you can put your head in the sand, that you can do.

 

See post 233 [/QUOTE]

please be specific as to what you are talking about, in your current post.

 

Yeah whatever. This video is absolutely nothing. If you just watch the video you can't tell this character has OC's face and you can't tell she gets cut. This is completely manufactured outrage. Crazy people do crazy things but to suggest this going to trigger or that it suggests anyone should behave badly is crazy in and of itself. The Congressional critters have created this outrage and not the actual video which amounts to nothing.

 

Yeah yeah yeah. Telling people to be peaceful really means riot. I don’t have to deny anything. He never told anyone or even implied they should riot or be violent. But like you said, it’s all code. Up
Means down left means right. Peace means war. Yep.

On the other hand Democrats and the MSM repeated that police are racist murderers every night and look at THOSE RIOTS!!! Far more dead. Far more injured. Far more damage and scars.

Again. You think Trump told people to drink bleach too? I can’t help TDS. You have to fix that on your own.

 

Oh, then I guess it's A-OK under House rules of conduct for crazy assed Gosar to depict the murder of another Representative and an attack on the President. Super good logic.

 

Crazy people are still crazy. An anime video isn't going to make a difference.

 

Was that supposed to be an actual fact-based, reasoned reply?

FAIL.

 

Its the truth regardless of your inability to recognize it.

 

It's not my problem that you're not very convincing.

 

Dont need to be convincing. I'm fine with being correct.

 

Well, here's the problem with that "reasoning"; if you were correct, I'd agree with you.

Be better with facts, logic and reasoning. Me agreeing with you is a prize worth chasing.

 

False, you disagree due to political partisanship.

I am objectively correct.

Your inability to see through lies and find the truth is not my fault.

 

Unfortunately, total delusion is protected by the first amendment.

 

Not one example of a congressperson or member of government threatening another member of government with violence.

Provide the quote.

The rest is irrelevant. Start a thread, if you want to debate another subject.

 

I stand by my comment.

TDS is a thought terminating cliché, and, as such, not a valid rebuttal.

 

Yes, a stick of dynamite is still a stick of dynamite, that doesn't mean you light the fuse.

Capiche?

 

Benefits the left the most.

 

It’s the only explanation to justify how people can hear riot when one says peacefully protest. Not my problem you hear words that aren’t said.

 

Your side has a tendency to impose on free speech areas too much.

 

please be specific as to what you are talking about, in your current post.[/QUOTE]

My bad post #234

 

You must have a very strange definition of violence. If you say you need to punch someone, beat their ass, TAKE THEM OUT TONIGHT, etc and do not consider that violence, then you're not engaging in honest discussion.

 

Why would any Republican want to kill AOC? She is the best thing in the world for Republican campaign ads.

 

Do you live your life worrying about what crazy people might do because of everything you say? Sounds exhausting to me.

 

Though-terminating clichés are non arguments, and, as such, incompetent.

If you want to start a thread on the subject, do so, and we shall debate it.

But, interjecting the "TDS" cliché in an argument is not a merity worthy rebuttal, because it's predicated on another debatable conclusion not included in your argument, so it can't be used as a merit worthy argument. Either tell us what you are really saying, or don't say it.

If you cannot understand that, let me know.