Rep. Stefanik SHUTS DOWN Reporter Trying to Make Dems' Case for Them

Reporter? No.

Front for the Democrat party? Yes.

I can't get enough of Stefanik.

 

If there was so much corruption why were only issues surrounding Biden targeted by trump and his personal lawyers?
Why did they not utilize open government channels to investigate the corruption?
Why were these issues not looked into 3 years ago?

The answer of course was to damage a man that was besting trump in virtually every poll.
Which is election interference.

 

Because Burisma was the biggest and at the top of the list so high that Yavanivich testified that when she was facing confirmation hearings the State Department gave her special briefings about Burisma and Hunter Biden to prep her.

 

So Biden was the only level of corruption in the entire country?

You must be joking.

 

This lady is going somewhere, she's been excellent through this whole sham creaming the Dems and the MSM with the FACTS and the LAW and here the TESTIMONY. The reporter just wants to ignore that, well what changed see nothing changed..........well DUH yes it did as was testified to an as Stefanik schools the ill prepared reporter.

 

Biggest =/ only. Why did Yanvanovick get the special briefing on that particular corruption scandal when she was being confirmed?

 

So.....why did Trump hand over huge millions in US aid to Ukraine in 2017 and 2018.

 

So you believe Hunter Biden being placed on the board of a private company is the biggest instance of corruption in the entire nation? That’s impressive, maybe they should be investigating the US?

 

Have you not listened to this entire thing, that has been gone over and over and over and over. They had had investigations that turned out to be scams under those administrations which were finally voted out and Zelinsky elected on a campaign to go after the corruption and then the new government was installed and Trump had ever right to assure himself that the investigations would begin, we wouldn't be sending more money down a corruption black hole, a DUTY to do so. The Dems did not prove their case, no more evidence is needed they did not bring charges of impeachable offenses. Nothing Bolton could say would change that.

 

No and I didn't say that are you denying that the State Department under Obama had serious concerns about Ukraine corruptions and Burisma in particular?

Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) pointed out that Yovanovitch was specifically prepped on how to respond to questions about Burisma and Hunter Biden during her Senate confirmation hearings.



STEFANIK: And you also testified that they Ukrainian thought it would be a good idea to set up this architecture of a special investigative office that will be all about the crimes and corruption. I know this was before you arrived in Ukraine but you are aware that the first case that the U.S., U.K., and Ukraine investigators worked on was in fact against the owner of Burisma?

YOVANOVITCH: Yes.

STEFANIK: And that was during the Obama administration.

YOVANOVITCH: Yes.

STEFANIK: And in your testimony - and you said today - the investigation was never formally closed because ‘it’s frankly useful to keep that company hanging on a hook,’ right?

YOVANOVITCH: The Ukrainian investigation was never closed. … Because we didn’t see the Ukrainians moving forward on that, we no longer partner with them on that case or in that way.

STEFANIK: Let’s take a step back. The first time you personally became aware of Burisma was actually when you were being prepared by the Obama State Department for your Senate confirmation hearings. This was in the form of practice questions and answers. This was your deposition, and you testify that in this particular practice Q & A with the Obama State Department, it wasn’t just generally about Burisma and corruption, it was specifically about Hunter Biden and Burisma. Is that correct?

YOVANOVITCH: Yes, it is.

STEFANIK: And the exact quote from your testimony, Ambassador, is ‘the way the question was phrased in this mock Q&A was, what can you tell us about Hunter Biden’s you know being named to the board of Burisma?’ So for the millions of Americans watching, President Obama’s own State Department was so concerned about potential conflicts of interest from Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma that they raised it themselves while prepping this wonderful ambassador nominee before her confirmation. And yet, our Democratic colleagues and the chairman of this committee cry foul when we dare ask that same question that the Obama State Department is so concerned about, but we will continue asking it.

It was front and center in the Obama administration why do you claim it should have been on the backburner in the Trump and that he hadn't moved it down the scale because Biden was running for President is an impeachable offense and warrants removal from office.

 

Jayzuz. So....why did he not insist on those investigations (into corruption) before aid was delivered in 2107 and 2018?

 

As noted before: Prior government wasn't legitimate enough. And it may be that it's all in the clear anyway, but even if it is, it's something for us to know and clear for ourselves.

Not a high crime or misdemeanor at all. Pelosi gets to cry moar.

 

Simple. The FBI is corrupt and our Federal government is full of deep staters, that's why.

 

It was on the backburner if it took them three years to even look into it — coincidently occurring after biden announced his nomination.

Why did the trump administration use legal channels?
Why did they suddenly grow such interest in the case?
Why did they want the investigation publicly announced?
Why was all of this irrelevant until Joe became a possible threat?

 

Yes, everything but trump’s cabinet of lobbyists are corrupt...
The man that has had numerous businesses, organizations and charities shut down for fraud and corruption is the one we should trust...

Thanks for the npc talking points!

 

THERE WAS A CORRUPT UKRAINE GOVERNMENT AND PRESIDENT. There were always promises of investigations and yes secret deals to investigate and as Volker testified they never came through which was one reason for a public announcement, to the new President to publicly commit. It came relevent with the new government, why didn't you listen to the Presidents defense give the facts instead of the House managers with their speculations and conjectures?

And none of it an impeachable offense.

 

Go what the video of the trial I'm not here to educate you because you didn't.

 

Strange seeing that the purveyors of what is or isn’t impeachable — impeached him...

So again, if this was not the most pressing level of corruption in Ukraine’s government, it wasn’t the biggest, wasn’t going to impact the distribution of US aid, why was it suddenly worth cutting off congressionally approved funds right after Biden announced his candidacy? Just a happy little coincidence, right?

 

Biden is not above the law and just because someone is running for President does not make them immune from investigations.

Biden is not Trump's political rival because BIDEN IS NOT EVEN THE DEMOCRAT NOMINEE!!!!!!!!

 

We already know that Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Strzok, Page, Ohrs are all corrupt. That is a fact.

 

No...Team USA gets to cry 'moar.' This will not go away.

 

That sure makes sense!

 

I never said he was and if there is evidence of a crime it should be investigated through legal channels and not for political gain.

Disagree

 

None of those people did crimes for Trump.

Stop making crap up!