Republican National Committee, Michigan GOP ask state board to delay certifying election results

He's trying to toss out more than just fraudulent votes. And please learn what due process actually is. This mischaracterization is sad.

Nor are your complaints remotely believable. You've argued against Trump being investigated. All you care about is supporting the coup.

 

Agreed. The investigations are based on hundreds of legally binding affidavits and testimonies, mathematical/statistical evidence, countless reports of fraud, the well documented vulnerability of voting machines. That you brush this off as not evidence is irrelevant, the courts will review the evidence and reach their verdicts.

 

and many of these affidavits have ended up being baseless and unsubstantiated.

you think judges gladly ignore affidavits that are backed up by real evidence??

 

It's not a coup is courts rule in Trump's favor and Trump won't be president if they won't. You know that, I know that, everyone knows that, the real reason of this liberal anti-democratic process hysteria is their fear that their election fraud is about to be exposed.

 

Trump is calling for state legislatures to overturn the results, if the judges rule against them.

how is that democratic?

 

Wrong.

The ONLY "Hysteria" is coming from Trump.

Try again.

 

nm

 

exposed by whom?

Sidney Powell, the crazy lunatic???

LOL!!!

 

I've debunked some of the "mathematical evidence" right here in the forums. The "affidavits" have been laughed out of court for failing to actually show any voter fraud, failing to provide pertinent details, failing to substantiate claims, etc. etc. Hell, even Trump's own legal team admitted that their method of gathering affidavits had resulted in many false claims and spam.

None of the affidavits that the courts have reviewed so far have held up.

I "brush off" these claims because they are made without evidence. Every time I ask for evidence all I get are screeches about how evidence doesn't matter, only feelings, or that the check is in the mail.

And do you really expect me to believe that you guys are going to stop circulating fringe conspiracy theories about fraud when none of this holds up in court? Really?

 

its in his Tweet.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trum...lRe_NOfDbcjVv08OK907glpveqoAFpfeH9Iw7j7ayENSd

.....Why is Joe Biden so quickly forming a Cabinet when my investigators have found hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes, enough to “flip” at least four States, which in turn is more than enough to win the Election? Hopefully the Courts and/or Legislatures will have........the COURAGE to do what has to be done to maintain the integrity of our Elections, and the United States of America itself. THE WORLD IS WATCHING!!!.....

 

I understand that it's your habit to interpret everything President Trump says in the worst way possible, but even you must surely realize that there's a pretty big gap between "Hopefully ... Legislatures will have ... the COURAGE to do what has to be done to maintain the integrity of our Elections ..." and "calling for state legislatures to overturn the results, if the judges rule against them." He's talking about investigating fraud to make sure that legal votes are counted and fraudulent ones are not.

 

no, he's talking about the legislatures not following the popular vote and choosing the Trump electors, not the Biden electors.

 

There are no dirty tricks. You are spreading a lie.

 

Affidavit aren't legally binding. They're just a recorded claim/statement. They don't carry any legal weight.

 

They are equated to statements made in court, under oath, if they are lies, they are subject to severe criminal penalties.

 

Where did you come up with that?

Perjury/Lying on Affidavits is Rarely Prosecuted.

https://daily.jstor.org/why-is-perjury-so-rarely-prosecuted/

 

Only if said Affidavit is presented to the court. You can fill 1,000 of them saying the moon is made of green cheese. You can wave them before a camera or in a video on Youtube ain't they're not worth **** until you present them in court which Gulliani/Trump hasn't done.

 

That's not what he said. You're imagining words that aren't there.

 

Now you're splitting hairs, of course this entire conversation is about the evidence including these hundreds of affidavits that is going to the court.

 

Affidavits are not evidence. Did you learn about them on SovCit website?

 

Wrong again.

It's a sworn testimony and as such is evidence given by a witness who has made a commitment to tell the truth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sworn...y is evidence given,with the crime of perjury.

 

Yep, because Trump says. No other reason whatsoever.

 

No it isn't unless they're actually produced and accepted in a court of law. Until that time they're not evidence.

 

By themselves, affidavits are not evidence.

 

Yes, in a court of law affidavits are evidence.

An affidavit is admissible evidence
https://www.legalnature.com/guides/...sed#using-an-affidavit-as-admissible-evidence