Roger Stone May Have Just Exposed A Major Issue With Mueller’s Report

If you're expecting a raise in your entitlements you're undoubtedly disappointed with Trump. If you're here illegally, you're disappointed also. There is nothing that you can aspire to that Trump has taken away. Crybullies should focus on expecting more from themselves and less from the DNC nanny state teat.

 

"So if your point is that Roger Stone is better than Donald Trump..."

That's nowhere near my point. I can't imagine how you might have come to that conclusion.

I think that my post was pretty clear. The point is that we cannot allow ourselves to become a country in which we search for acts, present them as being committed by persons with whom we disagree, then sell them as being criminal. That is what totalitarian states do.

 

This is not uncommon in leftist country nations....HItler, Pol Pot, Stalin, Castro....all did it. Should we be at all surprised to see it finally creeping it's way into the leftist minds here in the States?

 

I hope so. Is the reason Trump is the president.

 

Er...

No, you're not.

The term 'RINO' has the long-established definition of referring to a politician, who was elected as a Republican, but regularly sides with Democrats.

https://www.conservapedia.com/RINO

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/rino

So, please tell me how your use of the term is consistent with the established definition.

 

I've been saying this all along. This was never investigated by the FBI. The 3 (not 17) intelligence agencies who said the DNC hack was the Russians was the FBI, CIA, and NSA. The NSA hedged and said only moderate confidence that the Russians were the source of the hack. Why? Because they relied on CROWDSTRIKE. The FBI and CIA were relying on them, knowing that the Democrats were trying to place blame on Trump. This was Comey and Brennan, who were actively colluding with the Democrats to frame Trump. To this day, they have not released evidence that the Russians hacked, not even in the Mueller report, other than the crap evidence fabricated by CROWDSTRIKE.

The Russians would not have left the trail of crumbs leading back to them that they are alleging.

 

Well, you will argue that some of the OOJ charges in the Mueller reported were "searched for acts", while I can argue that many of the acts were in plain view, via twitter and presidential actions.

But I find it hard to argue that anybody had to search (hard) for the campaign payoff story.... it started with a man willing to take a bullet for the president, and ended with that man in prison and Individual-1 still walking the streets a free man... That's the miscarriage of justice here, as I see it (Not that Cohen shouldn't be in the pen, but that he's alone in going)...

 

"Well, you will argue..."

Dunno why you'd bother to quote me; as you are conversing with some imaginary phantom me.

I'll not insert myself into your conversation with a ghost. Carry on.

 

Certainly not about the likelihood of Russia's covert perversions of the US presidential election in 2016, of which there is sufficient evidence for the FBI, NSA, CIA, and Republican-controlled Senate Committee on Intelligence, among others, to conclude that Putin interfered to help Trump and hurt Clinton - in line with what he has done and persists in doing by spreading discord and chaos via disinformation to promote rightwing extremists in European elections.

Still, Trump's suspicions that some 400 pounder in his bed is behind the caper is quite delightful.

 

Yeah ... it was the heads of those alphabet agencies who were spreading the Russian disinformation on collusion. Wiki published the cyber weapons, and Putin had Snowden. The chance Putin wouldn't have used those tools to misdirect investigators is zero. Assange knows his source and Assange says it ain't Russia.

 

Unfortunately its hyper-partisan derangement that compels liberals to believe whatever the Deep State and lib media tell them

 

Actually, yes... I do have an idea. It would be absurd for a national organization like the DNC to use an in-house server like that one in one location. It's not a question of the server itself. It's a matter of communications to that server. Given that they're going to be accessing it from many points across the nation. They would use a commercial data center like AWS or Azure or similar.

Comparing the size and data needs of the Clinton Foundation to the DNC's is beyond ridiculous.

So... you actually realize how absurd what you are saying is, but that doesn't stop you from saying it? Amazing!

 

Nor reported on by reputable sources.

 

LOL. Every body's too delicate. Every body is a RINO. Every body is not smart enough.

The whole world is wrong, except tRUMP and his pawns.

 

Nah, as one tRUMPer just pointed out, it's the CIA.

 

Absolute nonsense. Spinning up B.S. and lies is Roger Stone's entire career.

Robert Mueller is as solidly a conservative Republican as anyone could hope to fine. More than that he is a prosecutor with a reputation for truth, for procedure and for following both the rule of law and of the DOJ. It is that mindset that liars like Stone try to spin against the man, as liars so often do. Try to turn a strength into a weakness, by lying about it.

The report plainly shows Trump tried hard to obstruct justice. But Mueller follows the rules and the law and would never indict a sitting President. It's as simple as that.

 

Oh FFS........really?

Evidence ? NOBODY but the most ridiculous Info Wars level conspiracy theorists are even debating this. Russia hacked the DNC, thats not up for debate.

 

Meanwhile, conservative Republican attorney George Conway persists in speaking truth to power, and has the cult of dysfunctional personality in a tizzy and their sh¡thole messiah apoplectic:

"The Russia investigation was a legitimate investigation, with a legitimate basis, into how a hostile foreign power tried to interfere with and undermine our democracy....

​

But because you are a malignant narcissist—a person with both narcissistic and antisocial personality disorders—you couldn’t view it that way. Instead of complying with your oath of office, and instead of taking stock of what was in the best interests of the nation whose Constitution and laws you swore to uphold, you viewed the matter purely in terms of your own ego: You viewed the investigation as casting doubt on what you perceive as your great election victory.

​

Even today, despite the well-founded assessments of the intelligence community, and despite the damning evidence laid out in the Mueller report, you refuse to take what the Russians did seriously

... it is his "greatest offense against the country, an offense that incorporates but vastly exceeds the statutory crimes you’ve committed.

"It is an offense for which you should pay with your office, regardless of whether you are ultimately brought to justice in the courts of law."

https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...ump-for-viewing-mueller-probe-purely-in-terms​

 

I submit the fact that neither you nor I have direct knowledge of the truthfulness of that claim. All that I know, is that we have been told that by the same people who foisted the collusion hoax on us.

Maybe it's true and maybe it's not. We don't know one or the other. At this point, we'd be fools to blindly accept it as true.

 

Those are facts and context for those concerned with the truth. Vips have presented the only evidence so far. Ignored.

 

People caught up in this fraud like Flynn, Page, Papadopulos, etc. should be completely exonerated and restitution paid for legal fees. This "investigation" was COMPLETELY BOGUS from beginning to end!

 

Exactly!

 

Give it up, Mueller's real background was exposed on this forums system many months ago. He's no justice angel. He's actually fairly scummy in nature. He's also a classic damn RINO. Enjoy.

 

NOBODY “foisted a collusion hoax”. The hoax was the right claiming that in investigation into russian meddling in our election into an investigation of Trump. Is disingenuous to history to even make that claim. The investigation was into the Russians hacking democratic emails, and then helping the right. Nothing more, nothing less. Trump then fires the guy heading the investigation, and the investigation gets handed over to a special counsel.

Don’t forget TC, the special counsel DID investigate and made a very clear determination that the Russians DID exactly that. The purpose of the investigation was to to determine their motive. NOBODY, but the those on the right who are trying to deflect, is questioning that they did.

 

So because he's not, in your estimation a true republican, then any investigation he heads must be biased ?