Some didn't make it overseas...Boris Nemtsov was killed near the Kremlin, Denis Voronenkov, was killed in Kiev, Stanislav Markelov and Anastasia Baburova were killed in the center of Moscow, Natalya Estemirova was killed in Chechnya, Sergei Magnitsky killed in Russia, Sergei Yushenkov was killed in Moscow as was Paul Klebnikov....all loud critics of Vlad the Invader!
I know - I was being a smart-ass?? Even I wouldn't believe their recovery could have been that quick. And that's even if they needed to recover. (if ya know what I mean )
And when it comes to abroad... it's specifically the UK where Russians are unsafe. So why is the UK so unsafe?
You are making way too much out Russians supposedly being unsafe in UK.....it's best to ask Putin why they are not safe there. Besides, Russian diplomats (spies) have been "dying" everywhere! https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/24/europe/dead-russians/index.html Aug 24, 2017 - Washington (CNN) Nine high-profile Russians, including several high-profile diplomats, have died over the nine months since the US presidential election on November 8. Among the recent deaths were six Russian diplomats. Some of the deaths appeared natural..>>
Nothing more, than propaganda. Noone knows who was behind an assasination. Besides, journalists are often killed. Very dangerous profession. Did you know, for example, that German jounalist Udo Ulfkotte was killed by CIA?
LOL...in one sentence you write that "Noone knows who was behind an assasination."...and then your very next words claims that the nut Udo Ulfkotte was killed by the CIA....LOL! Anyway...Udo died of a heart attack Jan. 13, 2017....he wasn't "killed" by anyone. He was known for his conspiracy theories, claiming on his Kopp Verlag blog that Barack Obama ordered the burning of bibles, that African sportsmen would "slaughter whites" if allowed in to Germany, and that Muslims were waging "fecal jihad" against Europe. This guy was completely crazy!
I told that about Politkovskaya assasination- noone knows who was behind her death. As for Udo- it is known that he was killed by CIA. Heart attack- it is just for general public, not to make too much mess about his death. Does it make a difference if he was crazy or not? Assasination of insane people is even worse.
You are funny. You want me to give you the source of information where I found out that he was killed by CIA and yet refuse to provide the evidences that Putin participated in assasination of Politkovskaya. His wife published a german book. By the way, he was a wise man. He predicted what has happened with Europe in terms of huge migration of muslims from ME countries.
Now, first provide me with the evidences that Putin is responsible for Politkovskaya's death, then I will provide you with the name of the book.
Why don't you just look up, "Assassination of Anna Politkovksaya"....she herself was convinced that Putin was out to kill her. Whatever your blind mind thinks about this doesn't matter....the world know that Anna was one of Putin's victims....he even threatened her to 'shut up' or else!
Just to educate you. There are many papers written about her assasination. And every paper has a different view on the grounds who organized that. One of the versions was about Kremlin. Just one. There were also versions that it was organized by West, or that it was done by Kadyrov, or by his enemies to blacken him. So whatever you present here is just speculations and nothing more. As far as the book about Udo is concerned, there is no one. I just used the same approach as you usually do- claimed something withiout any proof. Although I do not belive that his death was natural- he was as a pin in the asss for many.
There is nothing supposedly about it. It's a fact. This only happens under the watchful eye of the British government. While Russia would like to see any evidence. The UK doesn't show it.
Dishonesty dishonesty dishonesty....once you start traveling down this road, it difficult turning back. Shame on you!
Russians are very, very unhappy that he is recovering. hopefully he can identify who tried to kill him
You are talking from your personal experience? Looks like for you it is indeed difficult to turn back as you have never addmitted that you deliver information without evidences.
What's the point of providing evidence when you are not even prepared to accept the source in the first place....how many times have you criticized the origin of particular articles if it argues against your preconceived notions?