Of course not, because none such video exists. It's possible there is an edited one, the truther nuts use. But regardless, they don't have to chase down a particular serial number, if one still exists, because they already know which plane it was.
It does exist, there is nothing in it to suggest it was edited, it has nothing to do with “truther nuts” and It is within a website created by someone who also rabidly defends the OCT. I will try to find it when I get a chance. But of course you knee jerk invent any BS convenient for you. And this is part of the reason why I often just ignore your childish nonsense. In this case however your post reminded me of that video.
That's what is referred to as the N-Number. It identifies the particular plane. Each country has a different letter, or a couple of them America has.. N. An engine would have a serial number, and at a few other locations.
No, You would not, and few parts have a serial number to identify it to a particular plane, the Engine would, but little else. All of the parts have a part number, to identify what kind of plane it goes on. You'll see in the news all the time, after a plane crash We found a strut, or a wing, that came off that type of plane.
you don't believe that a Boeing aircraft hit the Pentagon ... your points are moot unless you provide evidence of an alternative scenario ... of course you don't ... finally back on topic ... thank you ... I would like to hear more from this "mortician" ...
If you read the very first post in this thread it clearly says the morticians refused to reveal its contents.
Actually I might be able to post the video but its in part of a website that contains a ton of photos and videos and I won’t have access to my PC until tomorrow or Monday. The website takes way too long to load on my cellphone. Not that you’re really interested anyway.
If you wanted to understand the point of this thread you would not be posting like a silly child. That begs the question. Are you only posting in this section of the forum to ridicule (troll) every 9/11 discussion? It seems to me there’s very little that ever sounds like an adult post from you. Then again there are few OCT huggers that seem to be able to post in an adult manner, always resorting to labeling and ridicule so you are not alone in that respect.
This isn't about me.. Its your asinine claim about a secret note.. and another screwball conspiracy claim..
You’re right it’s not about you nor is it about MY claim, it’s about an article I came across that makes the claim. Grow the **** up Margot and stay the **** out of threads if your only agenda is to troll them and ridicule and label everything you disagree with that isn’t a groveling defense of the OCT.
According to the article it’s morticians (plural) and so would I if this is for real. I posted it in case anyone else heard about it and might have some adult input including but not limited to the potential knowledge that it is bogus. But it seems all the thread is doing is inviting a bunch of trolls.
Likely you would rather do ANYTHING than examine the facts and evidence surrounding the events of the day.....LOL
Brad Meltzer is a fiction writer (albeit a fine one ... have read many of his books) ... but that's all their is to this story Bob ... a supposed conversation with a mortician while he's trying to create characters for a new fiction novel ... and some mortician says something bizarre (perhaps he's hoping to be a character in the book) ... the link from the Washington Post is just another article written by Meltzer ... hard to have an adult conversation about this if no other evidence of this ever happening ...
Nonsense. One need not provide and "alternative scenario" to understand one has been tricked. All the facts, especially including the FDR analysis, contradict the claim that AA77 hit the pentagon.
Again it’s morticianS not mortician and if the guy is a fiction writer perhaps what he claims is fiction. But if it’s not fiction then the fact might be “bizarre” but the claim is just a claim, nothing bizarre about it. Not at all. See this conversation for example. People have conversations not necessarily because they might lead to problem solving but to explore possibilities and more importantly to expose issues that might lead to problem solving. Exposure also can lead to the possibility of uncovering additional evidence. Perhaps in this case by causing one of these morticians to open up about the claim (if true). What’s childish and ignorant is the attempt to shut down conversation with trolling drivel like this from the usual poster:
What’s hypocritical is that most OCT worshippers demand alternative conspiracy theories from those who don’t believe the OCT yet use the term “conspiracy theory” as a form of ridicule. For me all the facts put into question nearly every aspect of the OCT. In this case what makes no sense is that the FDRs/CVRs contain no serial numbers and conveniently make it impossible to connect these devices to the claimed aircrafts.
So 137 eyewitnesses are not facts. Actually thousands of witnesses, 137 documented. Overkill anyways. Dead bodies recovered are not facts.
Have no interest on doing so, they were already examined years ago. This BS was popular 10 years ago, aren't you guys a little late.
The question should be besides trolling why are you posting in this section of the forum if it’s all settled for you? All I read from you are a lot of childish posts whose purpose is strictly to try to shut down every discussion on 9/11. OTOH there’s nothing about 9/11 that’s settled for many of us and that’s why the discussion continues and will continue unless and until it’s settled to our satisfaction. Whatever you’re trying to do it’s not working, it only works for the like minded who are already convinced the official fairy tale is for real. There’s no such thing as being late to a discussion about one of the most egregious crimes in American history, especially one that has never been legitimately investigated. In law there is no statute of limitations for mass murder or any murder.
