This "waiting" for Hulsey's final report is really buying time and hoping and praying it's never published for peer review. Just the usual phoniness. That's the real reason none of them want to discuss the details of Hulsey's preliminary analysis I've challenge all to discuss. Once it's published for peer review and approved by the scientific community at large. it becomes settled science and that's terrifying to the OCT huggers. What's really going to change from his preliminary report? If anything probably a lot more detail and other supporting factors, such as the promised computer simulation(s) created by Hulsey's team. The heart of it is done and already explains in vivid detail how WTC7 could not possibly have collapsed even given NIST's contrived and deliberately biased data. That will not very likely change because much of it was well exposed well before Hulsey was even a discussion point. One only needs to look at the date this thread was created that contains a wealth of non-Hulsey detail: http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-nist-9-11-scam-exposed-in-all-its-glory.458597/ And a similar thread in another forum perhaps a couple of years earlier.