SENIOR HAMAS OFFICIAL : WE WILL CLEANSE PALESTINE OF THE FILTH OF THE JEWS

LOL

It's much less reading,
I'm not going to spend the next 3 days taking that line by line and looking up verses, especially when it is so vague, anything can be excused.

ie. do you see anything in there where Muhammed orders the killing of non-believers.
Do you see any of his favorite tortures.
Do you see any of his murders, rapes.

No you don't, it will not be in there.


One thing they push in todays lore is Muhammed forbade the killing of non-combatants, women and children, that may be in there, I don't know.
However he killed lots of non-combatants, women and children.

One of them was where he tied a woman's legs to two camels and split her in half.
He then married her daughter.

Will that be in there, no it won't.


Does it mention how it was decided he was a messenger of god.
By sitting on a naked 60 year old woman's lap, she decided it.
They never mention that in any mosque or online site.

 

So, despite all your claims, you can't point out a single false statement in the Wiki article. Thanks for the info.

 

LOLOO

as I said this particular article is to vague, and no, there is nothing wrong.
Even events are vague with no claims.

It doesn't mean all of wiki is bullsh-t.
Just some stuff. on controversial items.

It doesn't talk about muhammeds life, just the religion theory.
As I said, where does it say to kill the non-believers, it doesn't.

You need to point out an event in Muhammeds life.

It points out the 5 pillars are in the Qur'an, well they are, but they were in place with the rock gods, before Muhammed was born.

 

There is nothing about muhammed in there,
Well, Muhammed is not in the Qur'an.
Now if they were to say Muhammed was a nice guy and never hurt anyone,
Then I could show you endless verses that say otherwise.

 

Raiding caravans was the way they earned their living.. Same was true in Palestine.. Jerusalem was a hilltop village on the trade route in bandit territory.. That's why David was called the bandit king..

 

Ain't religion grand.

 

There is no mention of the Battle of Badr until the 9th century and the numbers were quite small. Muhammed's army was fewer than 200 and that probably included women,children and camp followers.

 

Lot's of sicko in religious lore, but what sticks out about Muhammed is that he is the main character.
You don't see any Jews and Christians out killing people to mimic David.

You have in the messenger a beautiful pattern of conduct to follow. (Qur'an)

 

Herding tribes are like that.. Same with the animist tribes in Sudan. They have been raiding each other for livestock and women for a thousand years. Don't suppose you have been to Sudan either.

 

As I posted on the other site, there are multiple sources giving different numbers.
And yes, The first documentation of Muhammed is almost 200 years late.
I point out that nothing in the religion can be taken as the truth,
But it is these writings the religion is based on.
and the same writings people rob, rape, and kill for.

 

They did it all over, however in Mecca there were only three different tribes from 400 AD to after Muhammeds death, and no raiding other than Muhammed.

 

In Jewish lore Joshua killed off all the Canaanites (gross exaggeration) and had a vast army (another gross exaggeration). Christians killed Muslims and Jews and everyone else on the way to the crusades... Then there were the witch burnings, the Inquisition, the slaughter of the Cathars, the 30 years war, and of course the Conquistadors.

I know I have left out a lot of crap, but I don't much care for sanctimonious.

 

If Johnny steals an apple, is it OK for me to steal one.

No it is not, especially if you are supposed to be a holy man.

 

Arabia had a tiny population... just like Palestine.. Probably smaller than Palestine.

You just don't know anything about the Middle East.

 

Not to forget about 550 jihads into Europe. Lots of killing going on.

 

The problem is not so much what they did long ago.
The problem is that in Islam it is for all time, and we are dealing with it today and tomorrow.


If we use Jesus and Muhammed for example, they are polar opposites.

we have people brainwashed in the religion, doing what Muhammed did.

And we have the general religion trying to portray Muhammed as a nice guy,
Don't read the books, take my word for it.
Read your Qur'an, don't make waves, or we will kill you.

 

I frequently rely on Wikipedia for many questions I have however I do not regard it as a reliable & impartial source when it comes to topics relating to Israel, the Mid East etc based on the sources citing insidious editing by trained & deceptive Hasbara agents that I cited in an earlier Post.
I am unaware of other groups that encourage deception as a means to inject their agenda.
For most other topics, I find it a brief & informative source.

 

I agree with that,
While it is a wonderful source for many topics, it is not always accurate on controversial subjects.
Religion and politics are examples, as you will get the opinion of the write in author.

 

Tell you what Nancy, why don't you quote ANY post of mine that could be characterized as "bashing" Muslims. And when you have failed to do so you will have demonstrated for us all that you simply view ANY criticism of Islamic doctrine as "bashing" all muslims. Revealing that you don't do the same when its Christian doctrine being criticized.

 

Why should I bother? Every time I do, you disappear for a few days then return with the same false accusations, same silly questions and same bullshit.

 

Actually, in Jewish lore Joshua didn't kill off all the Canaanites. Read Judges.

The main problem with radical Islam is that is coming to kill us now. Reminiscing about the wrongdoings of the past is not the best way to deal with the threat today. Would you let someone kill you just because one of your ancestors might have done something wrong five hundred years ago? This is taking the turning of the other cheek a bit too far, I'd say.

 

Yes, I know.. No Canaanite cities were interrupted. No telling why they glorified Joshua.

Radical Islam bastardizes Islam according to the majority of Muslims who are their first targets.

 

Funny, Islam reveres Jesus as the purest of the prophets.. a man without sin. That coupled with their rejection of all blood sacrifice explains their rejection of the crucifixion.

 

But it mimics the written documentation.

 

No. it doesn't and you don't read Arabic.