"Somebody Needs To Pay"......Says a Woman with 15 Chillins

Watch the future of America after what "progressives" created for us back in the '60s. This woman who has birthed 15 offspring thinks we need to pay to raise her kids. Her "fiancee", the father of 10 of the kids, is off in jail now. I think the government should force her to be sterilized and take all of the kids away from her.......otherwise they will just end up like her and the "fiancee"...........seriously why do blacks in these situations constantly refer to the sperm donor as a "fiancee":

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f3d_1357774198

 

Whilst I agree that anyone who can not financially take care of their current children financially should not continue to have children, compulsory sterilization of people by the government reeks of, and allow me to go full Godwin here, of such regimes as China, the Soviet Union, and the all time favorite, the Nazis.

When you advocate the government regulation your reproductive system, eventually they will come to regulate yours, in my wise and generally correct opinion.

 

God (*)(*)(*)(*) it's pathetic , no clue about self responsibility ....

 

When an individual goes so far outside of societal norms then it is time for the government to step in......thats why we have criminal laws......it is criminal what she is doing to these kids and society in general. She is essentially stealing money from others.......it does cost money to birth and raise kids and she has none. Also, she is dooming these 15 children to a life of poverty and crime.....all of which effects society in general.

 

A woman like this is essentially a danger to society. All the crimes these kids are bound to perform are on her head. Taking the kids away before they can be screwed up permanently is doing society a service. Is just sad there are people this deranged.

 

Really? Can I decide what societal norms are for you? For everyone else? That way I can regulate you and whether or not you reproduce?

I have to continue to disagree with your premise. You may not like this woman or her children, as it is actually spelled, but the government has absolutely no business in deciding whom it is that can reproduce.I mean, that reeks of something along the lines of eugenics or a desire to build a master race.

 

The middle class is taxed to death paying for the EBT-swipers living large.

 

How about just stopping the benefits? Win/win?

 

Government is already in your business when they take money from you to give to her. They are already choosing , can't you see that ?

 

What's your take on the gov't taxing others to support the unsupported kids?

- - - Updated - - -

 

And I am sure the guy who thinks he is father to the 10 is probably only the father of maybe three.

 

African Americans don't like to acknowledge the existence of social pathologies in their own community.

 

Pretty sad. Instead of government programs designed to encourage the tax user class to have more kids, maybe we should have went in the opposite direction.
Thanks liberals.

 

I agree with this woman. Someone needs to pay for her kids. She and those various baby-daddies need to do the paying, not taxpayers.

I agree that the government shouldn't make any rules about who a person can procreate with, but I don't believe that the government should have any part in funding it. If you want to have kids, pay for it yourself, don't expect anyone else to fund your choices.

 

Just curious how far you would take that in execution, so to speak.
So... starving/dead babies... no intervention? I assure you SHE will eat.

I am afraid I am going to have to disagree with both you AND the op...


It's churrins.

 

Actually, in this situation I think that Mexico and South Korea have a pretty good way of dealing with it. If a person can't support their children, they can bring their children to a state-run orphanage. This ensures that the tax money goes straight to caring for the children instead of supporting adults who should take care of themselves. It doesn't prevent procreation by people who can't support children, but it does focus the implementation of tax dollars.

 

Child endangerment / neglect laws pepper state statute books . Enforce them, instead of letting these morons and their champions emotionally extort the taxpayers.

 

What do you propose we do with people like this woman?

 

So you are ok with paying for their care... just not under the care of the parent/s?
This is the best interest of the parties? To split them from their parents and siblings and pay for them anyway?

Just asking questions here.

 

Only thing we can do is hope that sooner or later the newer generations will understand what a detriment is to have these many children. Our immigrants got the idea, and they should eventually do the same.

 

In Africa children die of starvation because there are just too many mouths to feed and not enough money to buy food.

America is drifting in that direction because bleeding heart libs encourage poor people to be irresponsible.

The starving children will be your fault not mine.

 

Dupe thread but I don't care. The more people that shove this in the face of *******s the better!

- - - Updated - - -

This quote is full of win!!

 

I am ok with it. Now days we worry so much about keeping a family together that children end up dying when put in unsafe situations and with untrustworthy people (parents).

It is not in the best interests of the child to be put back with a parent like this woman. Society is putting HER interests ahead of the child.

 

For questioning peoples scruples? I don't think so.

Yes, I believe the first one was mine.

 

Maybe so, but think what a great role model she is....LOL

Seriously there is just no answer, only time and the hope that these kids are learning what NOT to do. They need to make some changes in the welfare system for sure, there was some college actually paying girls not to get pregnant, so far it's worked. Great society we have, pay girls not to get pregnant.