Stubblebine.. No airplane hit the Pentagon

Discussion in '9/11' started by FivepointFive, Dec 26, 2018.

  1. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Bobby, are all the models and calculations included in the posts that show all these conclusions where arrived at? Yes or no?
     
  2. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    5,616
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It doesn't contain an identifier connecting it to AA77. That's the point observed by Cimino right off the bat. The unit was not assigned to any airframe at all, none. For someone in the business that is as plain as the nose on your face.

    Close inspection revealed many more errors and inconsistencies, but right off the bat the unit was not assigned to an airframe.
     
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,017
    Likes Received:
    1,065
    Trophy Points:
    113
    All are addressed in the post(s). Please keep the discussion (if you actually want to discuss these findings in the proper thread). By your failure to answer whether any are correct or incorrect (along with any explanation why you believe either way) I have to assume you're either deliberately ignoring these 11 findings or you find them all correct but you're afraid to admit it.
     
  4. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,017
    Likes Received:
    1,065
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know, the allegedly recovered FDRs/CVRs are nonstandard and that strongly points to counterfeiting.
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  5. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    Albert Stubblebine wasnt even in Washington DC at the time of the attacks, his opinion can be dismissed.
     
  6. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    5,616
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For the same reason and many more, your opinion can also be dismissed.

    But Stubblebine spent a career analyzing photographic evidence. He is a professional in the field. Therefore, his opinion carries much weight.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  7. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    48
    But he did measurements!!!! That's what his "career in analyzing photographic evidence" taught him!
     
  8. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male

    Actually my studies are more relevant than his. Since i dont make claims i cannot legitimately prove. Plus i dont believe i can walk thru walls and levitate, Stubblebine actually thought he could, which leads one to question not only his knowledge on 9/11 but to his sanity.

    "Well there was something wrong. And, so I analyzed it not just photographically, I did measurements… I checked the plane, the length of the nose, where the wings were… I took measurements of the Pentagon – the depth of the destruction in the Pentagon.”

    I can assure you confidentially, he never took a single look at the Pentagon incident and analyzed it.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2019
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,201
    Likes Received:
    260
    Trophy Points:
    83
    but his analysis is correct and yours is wrong.
    there is no tail mark or wing or engine marks on the building.
    The evidence suggests the 757 you measured is a figment of your imagination, since there is no evidence of a 757.
     
  10. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,312
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    And here we go again with your appalling self contradiction and almost certainly subsequent complete denial.

    YOU claim a light pole, held upright by 5 or so 1 inch bolts, would sever the wing of a 757. By simple correlation, that same light pole would slice off a tail fin.

    Yet now you suggest that the blast reinforced walls with concrete vertical columns would not!

    That is some really crazy mixed up crap! Can't you get anything right?
     
  11. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    The light poles were meant to break off at moment of sudden impact by cars....a plane will literally knock it off its foundations. Its hollow inside.

    P9290029.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2019

Share This Page