Susan Boyle assaulted, harassed by gang of 15 youths

At this point, I'm convinced a good number of the posters are mods that intentionally bait certain things so they can give out infraction points. So it's going to happen one way or another regardless. I'm not phased. Either way, all of this has been on topic, simply screaming it isn't, just like screaming "racist", simply doesn't make it so.

The short-sightedness of people never ceases to amaze me. Just because it -is- now doesn't mean it always will be, especially if the LW has their way. I have the foresight to see the plays in motion as they're happening. Reactionaries are the ones that whine about what has already happened.

It's irrelevant. Most of the country is waking up to what's going on, or at least is starting to suspect it. We're winning on awareness, whether you like it or not. What you should be scared of is what happens once awareness becomes policy.

 

I'm not suggesting anything for America at this point, honestly. I think it started off as a new homeland for European peoples, and a lot of safeguards were put into place by the founders to make it remain that way (including Lincoln himself advocating for the deportation of all blacks. Funny that never ended up in (((Steven Spielberg's))) movie), but we've removed all of those safeguards since then. It's now a failing social experiment that is going to result in the extension of the Hispanic 3rd world, and I don't think any good is going to come from that, mainly because there isn't a single Hispanic country that I would want the US to be like. Most likely the homogenous East Asian countries will take over at some point. Hopefully what happened here post WWII serves as a cautionary tale to the rest of the world on what "diversity" and "multiculturalism" cause.

I'm more focused on Europe at this point, the homeland of white people. Hopefully the right continues rising there and stops the genocidal campaign being waged by the left.

 

Except that immigration isn't 'white' peoples main issue. It's the lack of desire to have many kids. Until you can get 'white' people to have more babies, then nothing done will change the tide.

And realistically, you and I will be both long dead before it's as much of an issue as you make it. The best and real first step is to convince religious leaders of all faiths to promote contraceptive use. That will slow the demographic shift more then any immigration policy ever will. Oh, and stop bombing minority countries to dust, so they dont' have to travel to find new homes to live.

 

You and I both know they're in far worse shape than we are at the moment. It's funny, all one has to do is look through Germany, France, Sweden, and England, and compare it to Poland, to see what the future result of these practices will be. Yet, no one seems to be, and all the ones that do, have "racist" screamed at them over and over and over.

 

That can change, however. In advanced countries people slow down having children when the economic forecast isn't good. That's the responsible thing to do. Whites shouldn't have to compete with 3rd world people who don't care whatsoever about responsible breeding and simply apply for welfare benefits to have their choices subsidized by the taxpayer. There is also a sense among minorities that these countries, which have always been white, will become theirs within a few generations. That motivates them to breed, and demotivates whites to breed. Nobody wants to feel like they are bringing children into a country that is going to be owned by someone else very soon, especially when those groups are hostile towards your group.

So? Some people aren't only concerned about themselves. Some care about the future their children and grandchildren (and down the line) will have.

That isn't going to happen, though. The only people using birth control in large numbers are those people who aren't likely to have many children, anyway. The rapidly growing races are not self-sterilizing themselves with that stuff.

No arguments there, although one doesn't necessarily involve the other. We could bomb a country without allowing their population into ours en masse. There's no reason we can't.

 

No, they are not in worse shape than us. Many of their countries still have a 90% white European population, while ours is roughly 60%. That's a huge difference.

 

Back to the topic??

It sounded as though you were talking directly to Susan Boyle when you said that. I mean, think for a second, if you will, and picture yourself saying that to Susan herself.

smh

 

The numbers I saw were vastly different. I'm curious, were the figures you are citing nation wide, or specific to urban areas where the refugees are being held?

 

I have no clue at all what this post is even supposed to mean. None.

I don't know Susan Boyle. I know who she is, but don't know her personally. Why would I talk to someone I don't know about extermination?

 

Total population. There isn't a single Northern/Western European country with demographics as low as ours. It wouldn't take much for them to become homogenous if they wanted to be.

 

I think the figures I saw, which were closer to 70/30, were areas that contained migrant "no-go" zones, so that would explain why the numbers are different.

 

There are definitely areas of those countries like that. London is now majority non-British.

 

Ahh, as a parent I recognize the "sack of potatoes" defense of a tired toddler who's been told to go take a nap. Just go ahead and flop around then. After that though, you have to go take a nap.

 

You still haven't said what your post was supposed to mean. Susan Boyle has nothing to do with a discussion about white people being exterminated in the United States. This thread wasn't about that. It was about a gang of obnoxious teenagers assaulting her, verbally and physically, in Scotland.

 

If you live in London, and you're a British citizen, you're British. Is London now mostly non-citizens? I was there 4 times this year, and have a substantial amount of customers there, and their staffs are all British. Where are all of these non-citizens living?

 

A goat living in a horse stable is not a horse.

These are not British Europeans:

 

If you're a goat, you're a goat. You can't physically be a horse.

If you're a British citizen, you're a British citizen.

 

So, now I'm short sighted and a reactionary?

Let me know when you are ready to not belittle me.

 

Thugs are thugs. Could be green frog like Trolls, radical Muslims, IRA types, who knows? Someone doesn't like her, her values or her politics.

She needs a shotgun or 24/7 armed security at the U.K's expense.

 

I have two kids. I've never felt any pressure or any level of demoralization to not have kids. The people I do know who chose not to have kids didn't do it out of any racial/color issue. I'm not sure of the people you surround yourself with, but I detect a slight echo chamber that may be reinforcing your ideas.
Then again, I've never felt like my skin color made me part of a 'group', nor have I felt any hostility from anyone with a different skin tone.

True, and a fair point.

Except that many studies show that contraception that is free and widely available, and widely promoted reduces birth rates, especially to those under 18.

If those countries weren't being bombed, then you'd have less people needing a place to live, which (at the time) necessitated a more open policy. I mean, they have to go somewhere, unless your fine with them being kept out and simply dying from said bombings. I hope not......

 

Just like an Arab can't be a European, regardless of their "citizenship", which is given to them if they happened to be born on UK soil.

This:



Vs.



One of these groups can trace their history back on their land for many thousands of years. The other a few decades. Care to guess which one?

 

Ah, so I get it now. You can't be a British citizen unless you're white.

At least you're honest in displaying your extreme racism.

 

She needs a bodyguard. And yes, thugs are thugs. They come in all shapes, sizes, races, and countries.

I don't even know if these kids don't like her or her politics. They're teenagers. They're probably just thugs.

 

I read a study a while back that showed that young whites, even though they were not likely to be racists, still felt uneasy about the prospect of becoming a minority in the US. I'd have to look for it. But it doesn't show a direct link between that uneasiness and their willingness to have children. It may not have any effect, but I suspect that it does.

But among which races?

Sure, they could go somewhere, just not to European countries. Take the Islamic refugee crisis of the past couple of years. Why couldn't they have gone to one of the 50 Islamic countries in the world? Wouldn't that have been an easy transition for them? They speak the language, worship the same God, practice the same cultures for the most part. Why did they go to Europe, where none of these things are true?

 

yes, we know you believe whites/Europeans are superior to blacks/browns.