Ted Cruz Launches Senate Probe Into Bud Light's Ad With Dylan Mulvaney

None of those convictions had a thing to do with Russian collusion.

 

This is factually incorrect. Meanwhile, why are you so desperate to avoid the OP?

 

Dylan Mulvaneys audience, whether targeted or not averages below 21.

 

And?

 

Its a fact. Feel free to point to the conviction you believe is related to Russian Collusion.

 

There is no "conviction," only fact. You can't point to a single thing I've said regarding Russian Collusion that is factually incorrect. We both know that.

 

Against the law to target minors with beer ads. Such strong opinions regarding matters you know nothing about.

 

Can you provide another example of another influencer drinking on camera who was charged with this? Even one? Sounds like you have a lot of strong opinions regarding matters you know nothing about and that you are just trying to substitute your hatred of trans people for actual evidence.

 

LOLOL! YOU are the one proclaiming my fact is "factually incorrect". And as we can all see you have nothing to support your claims.

 

You are assuming that the Russian investigation started with this dossier. That is factually incorrect. You are assuming that the FBI made no attempt to confirm any part of the dossier. That is also factually incorrect. Do some homework . . . even though I think we can both agree that there is no such thing as a Trump supporter who is capable of doing homework.

 

Regulations regarding advertising alcohol, cigarettes etc to minors doesnt involve criminal law. Silly. And Dylan has nothing to worry about. The laws only appy to the manufacturer of the products. Not the silly tik toker they choose for the advertising.

 

If that's what you need to tell yourself to run and hide, go for it.

 

Actually it been quite comprehensibly shown to be fact.

Quiet the opposite. They made significant attempts to confirm anything they could, offered Steele millions to do so. Put Dachenko on the FBI payroll, all in an attempt to confirm anything they could from the dossier.

 

In your alternate reality, sure. Back here in reality, that's bull ****, and you know it.

 

Yet when you make an assertion you provide no evidence to back up your assumption, i.e., they did make some confirmation of what was a fake dossier. And then you double down with an ad hominem fallacy.

Even CNN knows the dossier is fake and the FBI could not confirm it was real. Do your homework instead of telling other people to do their homework and let's upgrade the level of these discussions.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/11/politics/steele-dossier-fbi-durham-danchenko/index.html

 

That's not what "ad hominem" actually means. And, again, the investigation predates the dossier. You are confusing your own inability to defend your assertions with that of others.

 

The answer is pretty obvious. He was used to target underage drinkers.

 

You apparently forgot what you just said which was,"You are assuming that the FBI made no attempt to confirm any part of the dossier." That statement was an assertion. A false assertion. And your statement about Trump supporters was an ad hominem. I think what we have here is another Turing test failure. lol

 

1. How do you know that?
2. Even if true, so what?

Was there anything in that specific ad that was targeting children?

 

I read it somewhere. ALL TIK TOK users averages 19 years old. Doesnt surprise me that Dylans viewers average even lower age. Cant put Budweiser ads on Saturday morning cartoons either. The "targeting" is presumed.

 

Huh? Facts? Evidence? Logic?

 

This is critical to America! Get 'em Cancun Ted!

 

So many "minors" value trans endorsement of a product!

 

How many examples do you need that the space/time continuum and facts are tough concepts for the righties. They still haven't figured out that Bien wasn't president in 2020.

 

oh ffs … no kids would even know about this were it not the delicate blossoms on the fringe right for making a huge stink …