Texas bans Planned Parenthood - rejects MILLIONS in federal money for women's health!

If I understand it correctly, most of the issues pertaining to adoption have to do with the bureaucracy involved.

Streamlining the adoption process would likely help things a lot with or without an abortion ban.

 

I could agree with that for sure..

 

Name calling to discredit me, Bigots and Racists call people names. Nazis called Jews names. Human nature of an ignorant mind resorts to name calling.

 

My post was sarcastic.....extremely so....when you've logged a few more hours here, you'll better know the basic sociopolitical philosophies of the members, and when they're being snarky....

until then, you're a noob ..... welcome to the forum, by the way!

 

That is extreme ignorance. Lots of changes in our world Grannie, since you were young we have dispelled the myth of getting pregnant from toilet seats as well as kissing and holding hands.

Yes they can get pregnant keeping their legs closed, I know, its called Artificial Insemination, typically these woman are seeking babies hence not going into Planned Parenthood.

Access to the Vaginal is required, even in the severe case of rape.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_viability

 

words mean things.

 

Nothing in a one word post indicates sarcasm, your simply trying to pull your foot out of your mouth, poorly at that, more like "noob" than a "guru",you took a cheap shot because I am new here, nothing more, its easy to see.

Further as a "Guru", you would better serve "noobs" by directing them to search a "user's" profile for recent posts, it takes a minute or so,not hours. Seems I am not so much "noob" to message boards, am I?

 

Not the USSC. YOU! You define baby murder. Stand up!

Then I will destroy you.

 

The post I was addressing was the first post you responded to...the sarcastic one, not the "noob" one.

Don't get all butthurt, ffs

 

Seems your the one that is "butthurt" (projecting?), further you are now admitting that as a "Guru" you made a "noob" mistake, quoting the wrong post of mine, you quoted my third post in this thread, not the first. How is it that you made such a gross error causing such confusion, again, you simply took a cheap shot at a "noob" because you believe as "Guru" you are somehow better informed?

Get over being hurt, quit the childishness, and contribute, I am not here to simply have a childish argument with a "guru" that is in over his head with a simple "noob".

should of told me to search your profile to learn your position, that is the best place to find a user's posts. You may have the title of "Guru" but you continually prove that title is too easily earned.

 

/Ignore

Goodbye

 

Yeah, let's go back the "the "Good Ol' Days" of dealing with excess children.

No gubmint money wasted on kids!

http://journalstar.com/news/local/article_6fe526f8-2805-11df-8417-001cc4c002e0.html

 

Let me educate you some more, you did not ignore my comment, to ignore you should of actually not quoting me again, by pointing out your "ignoring" you made another statement. You simply have a big problem and insist that you must have the last word.

Guru is hardly deserved from what I observed in our little exchange. Too bad ones status does not reflect the content one chooses to provide.

 

"Guru" is a function of post count....if your weren't a noob, you'd know that.....now, move along...this whole exchange is off topic

 

You're hillarious. Now add up how much it costs to incarcerate all those unwanted kids when they grow up to become thugs.

 

The emotionally extortive "protection racket" argument is among the most absurd the pro-abortion (and pro-welfare) crowd offers.

 

i did................

lol

 

I want to know why the hell women think they have the right to kill men's children for convenience.

This is also true.

 

This is Nazi logic.

And you can't see it. WTF happened to your humanity? Where'd it go?

 

Soulless= the American Left Antibaby Lobby....

 

I'm sure you won't mind backing up that statement with some proof....i.e. LINKS. From reliable sources.

 

The pharmacy could be called a medical care provider.

I don't believe that is happening even though abortion is a simple procedure easily performed by nurses or others. After all, housewives learned to perform abortions for the Jane Collective in the days when abortion was illegal, and they performed thousands without mishap.

There are many "medical providers" aside from hospitals, many medical procedures are performed in doctor's offices. If all abortions were performed in hospitals, they would be a lot more expensive. Unless some complication occurs, clinics are perfectly capable of handling normal abortions. After all, they used to be performed on kitchen tables when they were illegal.

It is unfortunate after all these years that PP MUST continue to lobby for keeping a procedure legal that has proved to serve women well.

Planned Parenthood was serving women and men long before abortion was decriminalized. If you have EVIDENCE that PP has misled auditors, please produce it. If you have no evidence, you're just blowing smoke.

 

You'll need some evidence to be convincing in this discussion, just baldly asserting something won't suffice.

 

One more time....NO taxpayer money has been spent on abortion except in very limited circumstances. While losing taxpayer funding will cause PP to cut services, they will still be performing abortions. Even if you somehow managed to close the doors of PP nationwide, some other provider would step up to provide abortions.