The Curious Case Of Trayvon Martin’s Backpack With Stolen Jewelry and Burglary Tool…

So what you're saying, is that the Oct. 21st 2011 report of a burglary with the evidence of womans' jewlery ... can and will be admitted as evidence to prove why Martin attacked Zimmy ...

Is this what you're saying ?

 

It's a lucky thing for Zimmerman that he doesn't have some of his rightwing blogger defenders as his lawyer.....he'd get the death penalty.

 

Criminals are dangerous, when interrupted or detected. Many homeowners and police officers are murdered by burglars.

If TM was a B&E boy, then he was a potentially dangerous criminal. He could have walked or ran home, but apparently he stayed in the area and ambushed the neighborhood watchman.

Is this surprising?

 

This is hearsay ... you're actually alleging that a report from Oct 21, 2011 is proof of why Martin attacked Zimmy ... you've been asked to back yourself-up throughout this entire thread ...

Back yourself-up please.

 

I never said it was because of the break in. If the connection is made, it would show that TM was a young felon and demolish the narrative that TM was an innocent black male chased and gunned down by a neighborhood watch member.

 

No. What it does is show a pattern of reckless behavior showing 4 months prior to his death, he was starting a downhill slide. Why do you think they are going to call the guy who noticed Trayvon lurking in a hall, and then writing WTF or something like that on a locker? It shows a pattern of behavior and to argue its not relevant, is fine but the Judge actually disagreed and thats why O'Mara knows about these incidents.

 

I'm beginning to wonder, if Dee-DEE was driving TM around and dropping him off to case houses. She was in phone contact and could have been a get-away driver for "No-Limit N-word".

(Don't be surprised if this question pops up at trial with Dee-DEE on the stand. O'Mara should get the pings for her cell phone.)

That would explain her long silence until she was found by Tracy Martin.

 

Apparently having Trayvon as a known thief does not fit well with the liberal narrative.

 

Hahahaha!!!

 

It can show TM's character. This destroys the narrative that TM was an innocent babe in the woods. Sorry.

- - - Updated - - -

I am? Where?

 

I see ... so what you're alleging is probable cause ... that O'Mara with these apparent facts will introduce this report at the trial as relevant .... or as going to the character of Martin ...

Because through logical inquiry this would lead a reasonably intelligent and prudent person to believe this is defacto ... that Martin is actually a violent felon ... or behaved as such when confronted by Zimmy ...

Where Zimmy was defacto self-defending himself ...

Is this what you're saying ?

 

It will be used to illustrate the FACTS about the "character" of the REAL Trayvon Martin, as opposed to the absolute FABRICATIONS of Trayvon, the Pure and Innocent Choir Boy.

 

As with all "Trayvon got what was coming to him" rightwing threads....it basically boils down to the desire of his defenders to have "open season" on black men.


Just the 21st Century version of what I'm sure was the 1920s lynchers claim that "That boy looked disrespectfully at a white girl...if we didn't string him up, he'da raped her next time."

 

I am not sure about loving it, but you know this case has not went to trial so for over a year, its all been a string of maybes, with alot of the maybes now confirmed about Trayvon, but it sure was fun to watch and participate the ones who claimed he was the salt of the earth and not capable of even attacking someone wasn't it? I admire the few that actually pop in to degrade others because most of the Trayvon supporters are ashamed of themselves and have went away, and I can't blame them actually. Some people were conned, bottom line.

 

This supports the claim, that "Trayvon had it coming to him"...massively:

 

Exactly, the school police officer's testimony on the stand would be excellent for a jury to hear. He watched TM sneaking around the school, while he defaced school property. Then, he was found to be in possession of the women's jewelry (likely stolen from a local home) and a burglary tool. TM had a BS story and refused to name who the jewelry belonged to. The jury will hear this and that fact that the state's star witness is a liar.

- - - Updated - - -

We are waiting for an identification of the jewelry by the break-in victim. That seems to be the reasonable thing to do.

It's a great deal different than lynch mob tall tales of GZ chasing TM and pointing his pistol at him.

 

If the connection is made, then TM will have been involved in criminal activity involving the break-in near his school. It will remove the image of TM as an innocent and add credibility to GZ's intial suspicions. This will help GZ immensely at trial. That's why the lynch mob is soooo quiet in this thread.

 

Perhaps, TM thought it was open season on chubby Hispanics. Did you ever consider that? Or, do you only have eyes for blacks??

 

Well, good luck to O'Mara getting this introduced as evidence of self-defense at Zimmys' trial for 2nd Degree murder.

 

It will be revealed in TESTIMONY, not presented as physical evidence.

 

The lynch mob has dwindled to a tiny handful. They can't really argue facts anymore, so they have fantasies and personal attacks against GZ.

In their world view, the black males are victims. They usually avoid the black flash mob attacks on whites threads as well.

- - - Updated - - -

It should be easy.

 

And what is your position based on? First hand knowledge?

 

The jewelry is less damning then the 911 tape where Z was told to stay in his vehicle and not follow.