The Five Lightpoles at the Pentagon

Discussion in '9/11' started by usda_select, May 11, 2017.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,633
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83

    wel and thats exactly right. once the standing theory (OCT) is shown to be false that is all that is necessary since were not charged with investigating the matter, they were. They have the obligation to provide accurate information.

    [​IMG]




    you got a plane wing hitting a not one but '3' poles at 450 ft/sec, that wing has to take a 115kip pole weighing 300 pounds not one but 3 poles on one side 2 on the other from zero to 450 ft/sec instantly and that is impossible to do and still have a wing attached.

    It only takes one pole as shown in the previous clip I posted.


    Here is another clip different plane:

    [​IMG]

    thats at only 100 mph, now triple that speed, like ahot knive through butter, and remember 3 poles on one side and not so much as one lousy screw came loose from the wing! :eekeyes:

    actual tests corroborate the fea model
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2017
    Bob0627 likes this.
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm guessing he'll be back under a different ID using a different IP address. But if not, there doesn't seem to be any shortage of die hard US government defenders who are ready and willing to take his place. Maybe the next one can actually try to post a defense that doesn't require insults with every post. Junk science is difficult to pass off as real science when there are posters who know better.
     
  3. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Don't forget, all the planting of evidence wasn't enough, they also hard to trim the top of this tree and knock a step off the pole to it's right...
    [​IMG]
     
  4. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The ultimate insanity that the best way to stage a plane crash into the Pentagon, is to not crash a plane into the Pentagon. Guess the budget didn't stretch that far.
     
  5. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So if a large plane knocked down those poles and subsequently caused the Pentagon damage, how do you suppose the wings survived such that the plane didn't deviate from its course? Note I'm not asking you for an answer because you obviously don't have one, just your opinion since you believe that's what happened.
     
  6. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It was going 500mph and hit the poles about .5 seconds before impact. Exactly what significant deviation from its course would you expect to see in a from a 120 ton aircraft a fraction of a second prior to crashing?
     
  7. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    At a height just barely off the ground? I would expect the wings to be sheared off, possibly explode since the tanks are located inside the wings and the plane to hit the ground before impact. There is no indication that any of that happened. But that's just me. At the very least, I would expect a thorough forensic investigation just like any airplane crash investigation conducted by the NTSB using their standard protocol. There's no indication that happened either.
     
  8. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You've been watching too many movies. The poles are hollow. They were hit near the tops, the leverage of which caused them to fall over. The base of the poles are designed the break away in the case of a car hitting them. An aircraft wing at 500mph is going to have little problem knocking them over. And in the .5 seconds it took to then reach the pentagon wall, there is no way the trajectory of the aircraft had time to make any significant change.
     
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2017
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah that's your story and you're sticking to it. And you've been lapping up too many official fairy tales by your own admission. The only difference between your opinion and mine is that one is yours and the other is mine. Regardless, I'm more interested in a real investigation than posters' opinions, one we should have had, not a fake whitewash.
     
  10. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'll take that as a victory
     
  11. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You can take it anyway you think it makes you feel better. Unlike you I'm not here to compete with anyone about anything. This is a discussion forum, not a game site. Try Pogo or Yahoo Games if you're into games.
     

Share This Page