Actually my spellcheck spelled it wrong. I make tons of mistakes here, foolishly thinking that people can overlook them . What you’re doing is attacking the messenger so you can ignore the messages. So childish
Another extremist...it’s almost comical........be afraid ...we’re coming to castrate you hold on. It’s so cute how you use the term feminazi, straight out of Rush Limbaugh playbook.Well thank goodness we ignored boys like you because the changes that have taken place for women has been incredible even though it scares the crap out of man like you
? I realize that there is a problem. I wholly concur with the sentiments of the OP. It appears, to me, that you are not helping the situation. Your posts indicate that you are part of the problem.
Take note also the most likely person to murder a pregnant woman by far is the father of the fetus she is carrying. Nor is the said father to be is at any great risk of being murder by the woman.
Lawd, I honestly cannot deal with whiny weak white men complaining about being mistreated. Its so ridiculously annoying. The root cause of what this is really about is the fact that as women become more financially and socially independent, they have stricter criteria for getting into relationships. So there are a lot of men that are threatened by that...and who feel rejected. They actually have to have something to offer. They actually have to act with respect towards women at work or in public. Some rejected men get annoyingly whiny (like this post)...and sometimes some rejected men get very, very angry (hence the constant woman and liberal bashing). But ultimately, it doesn't matter...things are changing...they'll continue to change. But this is what happens when the weak members of a group that has maintained a power base for sooo long are in a position of having to deal more equality. Real men are fine with it but the weak ones feel threatened and start to whine.
Who can deal with whiny weak white men? That's just one reason why the democratic party is so distasteful these days... As for is there a war, you've suggested that you don't think so. I would point out that if you were to look at or take an "unconscious bias" course that the frames you're using are, in fact, designed to differentiate you, and to denigrate white males in general. And while I know that most of the time liberal folks all believe that simply acknowledging that you have a problem absolves you of it. Classic exercise in denial. The question isn't whether the dynamic of relationship did-functions demonstrates this perceived war that the OP refers to. I find it to be a result of the hyper feminist sociology that has somehow managed to insert itself in normalized liberal discussion these days. Yes, liberals do war against white men. Why? Because it's financially necessary in their minds, to define for them an "enemy" that must be overcome. It makes sense then, when effective legislation or regulation are then implemented to artificially change the competitive matrix to support the goal of higher participation. Seems that entitlement is a large component, to me, here. The radical feminist tact of demanding without competence seems unwise though, and clearly, we've seen how dysfunctional this can be. No one is keeping women out of competing, unless liberals have created the artifice of it. Take sports, or service in the military. Without structural separation, would women be competitive?
whiny weak white men = far right Republican chickenhawks: http://buzzflash.com/commentary/donald-trump-ted-cruz-and-millennials-return-of-the-chicken-hawks
No it is not what I said at all. . You made up the stupidest strawman a try to attribute it to me. I would never say anything so ridiculous. You’re just projecting how you think onto intelligent people
You know, I was a feminist in the 70s and an activist and I heard the same thing. We should be more ladylike and that our rhetoric is part of the problem and so on and so on. We ignored men like you and lo and behold so many drastic changes took place and I get the feeling you still can’t accept it
"I was a feminist in the 70s" Live in the now. "I heard the same thing. We should be more ladylike" Please quote me using the word: 'ladylike'. I can't find it. "our rhetoric is part of the problem" Yes, the hate-filled rhetoric is a problem. "men like you" Uh huh. No bigotry there...
It is hard to imagine anybody being raped in the 1960s and 70s. From what I saw the women fems were hung with free sex hippies, like hens back then rub their backs and they stick their butts up. And VD was epidemic. The clap and crabs always were where the hippie girls were. Even wrote a song about them. I didn't likr them because I was trying to have a family and they were everywhere, even on construction sites laying it on.
Oh I will be the first want to tell you that I am prejudiced against “men like you “...no question about that.That doesn’t make me a bigot, I dislike men who out down the efforts of women’s equality. ..by calling them childish names. It’s so funny how “men like you “cite women’s asking for equality as hateful rhetoric. Do you know how inane you sound?But remember the suffragettes were filled with “hateful rhetoric” my generation was filled with hateful rhetoric...like “we want equal rights” I just hope you don’t have a daughter
You focus on that small small percentage while I focus on the number one risk for pregnant women is the medical complications of pregnancy as the article says
What the hell? Are you actually suggesting that women didn't sexually assaulted in the 70's (or any other decade for that matter)...and that being a hippie means that you deserve to be assaulted by anyone? Women are allowed to have sex with whomever they please...and that doesn't mean that they deserved to be raped by anyone EVER. Seriously, some people need to seek redemption, therapy or some of both.