The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

That area is a no fly zone for aircraft how did an off course 757 get to the Pentagon? Where were the SAM's on the roof why they not activated? Where were all the cameras on the roof? Where is all the aircraft debris? None found except a few small planted pieces on the lawn from another old aircraft type...
Aluminum aircraft do not penetrate concrete buildings like government's conspiracy theory says...e..specially through all the rings of the pentagon...it's all an illusion folks.....no 757 hit the pentagon.... a tomahawk cruise missile bunker buster did

 

There were no SAMS on the roof.

There were no cameras on the roof which work for fast moving aircraft only for parking lot and entrance surveillance.

No fly zones can be ignored.

There was massive aircraft debris and none of it from an older aircraft and not a shred of evidence that any was planted.

 

The amount of debris recovered from ALL 4 alleged planes barely fills up a small pickup truck. There is no record that any debris, not even the allegedly recovered FDRs, was ever matched using the serial numbers to the record logs from any of the alleged airplanes. All FOIA requests for such a match were denied.

See post #257 in this thread.

Not for you of course, this is just to set the record straight using FACTS.

 

All false.

All the photographs here are from the pentagon alone and they clearly show a great of debris far more than your fictitious claim about " barely fills up a large pickup truck "

http://www.911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html

This does not include the debris from the other crash sites.

So much for your assertions.

 

True, the rest of it might complete most of the back of a large pickup truck. No one who can successfully read this thread is blind.

My "assertions" (aka the FACTS) include the serial number match that there is no record of. Again, this isn't for you, you allegedly bought the whole shebang and have not one question you can post, remember fake one?

 

There were no parts identified with the particular aircraft, or anywhere close...
Youare saying the cameras and the SAM's were not working...why not? Why did they turn them off?
Try flying over Washington capitol region and see what happens to you..lol...

 

Where were all the bodies, luggage, seats, and other parts of an aircraft which would have identified this as a 757...there were NO parts, or anything that would confirm this was an aircraft, left alone a 757 as alleged by the government conspiracy theory.

 

It is not restricted airspace.
There are no SAMs on the roof.
If you think a missile hit the Pentagon, please explain the downed light poles and why the planners would add all of that to their "to do" list?

 

These guys did...what was supposed to happen to them?

 

Well, I am a pilot with over a thousand hours so I don't need to read anymore garbage from P4T than I've already suffered through. I've gone head-to-head with captain bobby too (in one of the rare times he wasn't trying to pretend to be a girl) and laid out several corrections to him, including his bs V-G diagram he uses all the time. It was a waste of time. The guy is as nutty as every other mainstream conspiranoid idiot.

 

Hani Hanjour....crashed his plane. Exactly what he was supposed to have done. I'd have been more suspect if he had landed somewhere. No great shakes to hit the largest office building on earth by square footage.

 

yeah the most heavily guarded building in the world....and no cameras and no SAM's operational...kind of weird don't you think....not to mention a 757 would not fly at that speed just above the ground....it would crash long before impact with your magical building...

 

You are the one believing the government's fairy tale about the dread arab attack....I am asking you where are all the suitcases/luggage, seats, bodies etc if it was a plane????? got you stumped eh?

,

 

Well, come up with a logical explanation for the lightpoles and we'll talk.

 

They accounted for the bodies, the luggage and the plane.

 

yeah they accounted for them alright...there weren't any....lol....where did they go? Did the Arabs make off with them? Oh that's it Osama bin Ladin....had the bodies, luggage, seats, etc removed...that is...he is a miracle worker, according to the government and their believers.

 

The parts logs for all 4 alleged planes probably have long been deliberately destroyed. That way no one could match the actual physical parts to the 4 alleged planes. Isn't that just so convenient?

 

BUMP

 

They are not facts they are baseless assertions and I clearly debunked them.

Yes it is for me and you are not asking anything either you are merely stating fiction and calling it fact.

But I did prove you wrong.

Out of your league again boy.

BTW you l Have posted questions which ignore in fear.

Quote one specific part of the WC report which you think is false and provide evidence that it is a lie?

Now run away like a coward AGAIN and try not to answer

 

Yes there were many many parts identified with the specific aircraft.

There were no SAMS at the pentagon period.

The cameras were not aimed at the sky or designed to view aircraft they worked fine.

Your example is a non sequitur.

 

Yes there were, you are simply wrong.

 

Then you should be able to support your claim with the results of the parts match as described in the NTSB crash investigation manual appendix. Please do so, I would be eager to examine such evidence. Perhaps point to a page in the 9/11 Commission Report that mentions it. If you can't, then you're just making things up like a good government apologist and coward who questions nothing about any of the official reports.

 

First you stop your lies and stop your cowardice and answer.

Cite one passage from the report which is false and show evidence that it is a lie.

You have asked for evidence on several threads and i have always provided it. You have asked questions which I always clearly answered\.

But the FACT is I have asked for this citation many time and you ALWAYS run because the only liar coward and hypocrite here is you and that is PROVEN FACT.

I did question it and you never have and that is proven now answer the question boy and stop being nothing more than an ignorant anti american BRAT which is all you have ever shown.
\

 

I haven't lied about anything. You're the one who keeps posting unsupported claims. First, that you've questioned the US government but can't find a single post of yours to back that up. Second, that "there were many many parts identified with the specific aircraft" (to use your own words) but can't back that up with anything either. You keep insisting you've "proven" all sorts of things and always provided evidence but when asked for such proof/evidence, all you can do is claim you've proven/provided it. Your own posts expose your fakery and your agenda, you are strictly a US government apologist and as such, a coward who can't bring himself to question anything about any US government official report, possibly terrified to or you have a job to do.

I never expected you to provide any evidence of your false claims because there is none, it doesn't exist. If it did, I would personally post it in this forum and so would you.

 

Typical government lapdog/lackey, who will do anything to support governments' criminal activity...
No answers, no questions, no evidence and no brain....try growing one.