The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Nov 1, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The evidence pointing to the flyover is overwhelming.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...arning-issued.482175/page-116#post-1070152825

    A few confusing statements by a witness doesn't make this evidence go away.

    I agree with this. What do you think Betamax?
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2019
  2. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,296
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What evidence exactly Scott?

    You mean the evidence where you were measured your computer screen and then later admitted you screwed up due to caffeine? Or is it the testimony of Roberts that you know claim that "he was confused"? Maybe it was the evidence that made you think the "flyover plane" landed at the Reagan airport tha you later retracted. What about the folks that saw a plane "north of the Citgo", but all have a different flight path.
     
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,112
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's called eyewitness evidence Gamolon. You heard of that right? It's commonly used in every criminal investigation and in the courtroom to support allegations, none of which were ever a part of post-9/11 procedure.
     
  4. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,296
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You mean all the eyewitnesses who saw a 757 actually fly OVER the Pentagon? Those witnesses?

    Oh wait a minute...

    There are none.
     
  5. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,112
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I mean ALL eyewitnesses regardless of their claims, into, under or over the Pentagon, explosions and molten steel as well as foreknowledge. You know, eyewitness EVIDENCE as explained to YOU, not that you really needed any explanation. You are well aware that eyewitness evidence always plays a major part in any and every criminal investigation and in every criminal case tried in a courtroom, never mind one of the magnitude of 9/11. Your pretenses don't change that fact or your full awareness.
     
  6. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,296
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    48
    There was molten steel at the Pentagon?
     
  7. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,112
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You forgot foreknowledge. You know I was talking about 9/11 eyewitness claims in general (i.e. EVIDENCE).
     
  8. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,296
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So you have witnesses regarding the Pentagon? This thread is about the Pentagon. Or did you forget?

    Now... you mentioned molten steel. Are you saying there was molten steel at the Pentagon or was that off topic?
     
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,112
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry I don't own any "witnesses regarding the Pentagon".

    Nope, you asked:

    And I answered your question:

    Did you forget? So I listed several examples.

    As much as the highest elements of the US government wanted to destroy as much physical evidence as possible, there is still an incredible mountain of evidence they just couldn't destroy. And a good portion of that evidence is in the form of eyewitness claims, especially corroborating claims and claims supported by other forms of supporting evidence.
     
  10. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,296
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Like which eyewitness claims Bobby? You keep saying this, but provide none.

    Were there witnesses to a flyover? Nope.

    You mentioned molten metal. Was there molten metal at the Pentagon or was that off topic?
     
  11. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,296
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I didn’t know your name was Scott.
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2019
  12. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    There's a good thread on this over at the Pilots for 9/11 truth forum. It's on page seven in the "Debate" section. The name of the thread is "Roosevelt Roberts Interview".
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2019
  13. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,112
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Was there something you didn't understand about "all of them" (i.e. eyewitness EVIDENCE) ? I gave you a few examples, I don't need to quote them all, they are far too numerous. For example, 156 recorded claims suggesting explosions.

    https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/lc-doj-grand-jury-petition/exhibit-34-petition-1/

    My id is to the left of everyone of my posts, same as you and everyone else who posts here. There's no forum rule that says I can't answer a question you asked another poster. Scott is free to answer it differently if he wants.
     
  14. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,296
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I guess you're the one who doesn't understand what off topic posts are. Again, this thread is about the Pentagon. Your link above goes to the following:
    WTCEXPLOSIONS.PNG

    Twin Towers Bobby, not Pentagon. Take it elsewhere. If you have eyewitness testimony in regards to the Pentagon, then please post it.
     
    l4zarus likes this.
  15. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,296
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You've already determined that was he has to say can't be trusted Scott. His accounts are WAY too unreliable.
     
  16. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,112
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's eyewitness EVIDENCE Gamolon as I explained to you and it's still not mine, I don't own it. It doesn't matter what the topic or the crime is it's still eyewitness EVIDENCE, what you were asking about.

    The truth of the matter is that nothing about 9/11 is off topic in this section of the forum, it's all interconnected. Everything about the OCT is a coverup and most of it deliberately ignores a tremendous amount of eyewitness evidence or fails to follow up on it. The bigger problem with respect to this forum is that 9/11 is strictly relegated as a sub-section to "conspiracy theories". 9/11 is not a conspiracy theory, it's a hard and sad historical FACT that requires its own legitimate discussion section. The same is true for JFK. Conspiracy theories should be a sub-section of both topics, this setup is ass-backwards but unfortunately follows the same false pattern as most discussion forums, thanks to the CIA and the MSM.
     
  17. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    The MOD warning at the beginning of the thread implies quite the opposite.
     
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,112
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ask me if I care what you think it "implies".
     
  19. Falena

    Falena Cherry Bomb Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    20,953
    Likes Received:
    3,340
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2019
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page