The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

"... those terrorist cells more commonly known as the legislative, executive and judicial branches ..." - Dr. Dahlia Wasfi

ALL of the carnage committed and ongoing by the war criminal machine (the US government) since 9/11 is rooted and being committed under pretext of 9/11 and the fraud known as the 9/11 Official CONspiracy Theory.

"We have always been at war with Eastasia." - George Orwell "1984"

"War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength." - George Orwell "1984"

 

Thanks Bob, Dahlia Wasfi tells it like it is, and that was 2007! I wonder what she's doing today?

 

Still working for peace, a nearly impossible objective given the military industrial complex war machine for $profit.

https://www.facebook.com/Dr-Dahlia-Wasfi-156811358987/

 

US Military Occupation of US Black Communities? ... repatriation of blacks to Africa? ... yeah, ok "Dr" Wasfi ...

*facepalm* ...

 

Hey Shinebox...

Do you recognize that the US is the bad guy in the world?

 

and what does this have to do with the Pentagon on 9/11? ...

 

Still playing games huh?
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-78#post-1069877430

 

I have already agreed with you on that point Scott ... now please link it to the Pentagon on 9/11 ...

 

What's the use of playing dumb when the viewers can read what was said?
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-73#post-1069719148

Your position is a little unclear. I'd just like to hear you give a clear unambiguous answer. Say yes, or no. Do you recognize that the US is the bad guy in the world?

I'd like to hear from Gamolon too.

 

LOLOLLOL

There are no viewers, Just you and Bobbie.

And a couple laughing at you both.

 

I'm done with you and your stupid questions Scott ... you're just another basement troll that won't answer questions despite the many times I have honestly answered your questions ... no more pay for click for you ...

 

I don't see how any objective truth-seeker could call this a stupid question.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-78#post-1069894912

Link to a question of yours that I haven't answered. You've just refused to answer my question and all of the viewers have seen it.

Hey Gamolon...

That question was originally for you. Where are you?

 

what question of yours have I not answered Scott? ...

 

LOLOLOLOL

There are no viewers dude, wake up.

and you don't answer anyone's questions.

I just check in for my daily dose of stupidity.

Ahhh, yes, that's enough for today.

 

This one.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-78#post-1069906354
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-78#post-1069894912

Please say yes, or no.

 

yes ... now please link to the Pentagon ...

 

Does this mean anything to you?

There's a mountain of proof that no 757 hit the Pentagon. You just won't recognize it. It's all been posted in this thread. This case was closed a long time ago.


http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=9632&st=0&start=0

National Security Alert - Part 1/9 - Sensitive Information


http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/faq/can-north-side-plane-hit
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2170

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/docs/pcamframe1.jpg
https://www.911-strike.com/ldsxox1.gif

National Security Alert - Part 6/9 - Sensitive Information

(5:10 time mark)

April Gallup - Was there a bomb in the Pentagon?

(2:20 time mark)

http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
----------------------------------------------------------------


This explains the passengers' remains we are told were found at the Pentagon.

Painful Deceptions 911 Documentary by Eric Hufschmid Full Version

(43:45 time mark)


The crash site in not consistent with a 757's having crashed there.
http://physics911.net/missingwings/


This pilot says that the maneuvers that flight 77 had allegedly done just before the alleged crash were impossible.

Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out!



September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M
(1:55:25 time mark)

 

Hey Scott ... have you watched he Coste vids yet? ... it's pretty convincing that a 757 hit the Pentagon ...

 

Have you read Coste's detailed review of Hulsey's preliminary report yet? Based on his review, it's pretty convincing Hulsey is correct that NIST's WTC7 report is an abysmal failure filled with fabrications and that their theory is impossible.

https://www.911tap.org/557-news-rel...y-s-interim-report-undercuts-nist-wtc-7-study

Don't you agree?

 

wrong thread Bob ...

 

Scott and his "viewers" ... lol ... just more proof that he is getting a few pennies per click on his ridiculous troofer vids ...

 

Expected cowardly evasion Shiner.

 

cowardly? ... really Bob? ... I have already explained that neither NIST nor Hulsey has any insight into the forces at play inside the building ... I recall many witnesses hearing groaning sounds from the building before collapse ... not mentioned by either NIST or Hulsey ... perfect world computer simulations are useless when certain factors are not taken into account ...

NIST may be wrong ... so what? ... absent of any evidence of CT, my "opinion" as that fires and damage from the collapses of 1 and 2 caused 7 to fail ...

your confirmation bias is glaring ...

 

Actually it's YOUR confirmation bias* that's glaring because nothing you posted has anything to do with Hulsey's analysis of NIST's WTC7 report or Coste's review of Hulsey's preliminary report. It has nothing to do with what happened to WTC7 or controlled demolition. It has to do with what DID NOT happen to WTC7. If you actually read Hulsey's preliminary report and Coste's review you would know that, so it's obvious you didn't bother to read either because your mindset is hellbent that ...

... even though there is NO evidence of any kind that fires and damage from the collapses of WTC1 and WTC2 caused WTC7 to be destroyed in the manner seen on multiple videos. The burden of proof always rests with the claimant, in this case the US government and more specifically NIST. YOUR confirmation bias is also a major contributing cause to your blindness, you don't see what you don't want to see. This is a perfect example:

So what? So everything about the OCT because NIST's theory peddled as fact IS wrong, not may be but 100% wrong because as Hulsey's analysis proves, it is in fact IMPOSSIBLE. And as Hulsey's analysis proves, NIST's analysis is based on multiple fabrications that are counter to any legitimate scientific investigation. In other words, blatantly fraudulent and specifically designed to arrive at a theory that YOU swear by despite your may be bulldung. And despite that, you're ready and willing to give NIST a pass for an incredible fraud perpetrated on all Americans as well as the rest of the planet.

So your blindness causes you to see Coste's analysis with regard to the Pentagon as perfectly up your alley but dismissive when it comes to your mindset that is determined to believe that WTC7 collapsed naturally as a consequence of the events of 9/11. You exhibit all the characteristics of cognitive dissonance as described by the charlatan psycho industry.

* Confirmation bias - the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

 

The charlatan psycho industry uses the terms cognitive dissonant and confirmation bias in many studies of conspiracy theorists as I have shown ... but being as enlightened as you are, you know better right Bob? ...

yes, and absent of any evidence of another mechanism that caused the collapse of 7, I am going with natural collapse due to damage and fires ... sue me ...