THE TOP 40 REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001

No, it was your fellow Muslims inspired by the commands of allah. Weve heard the cockpit voice recording, proclaiming Allah Akbar as flight 93 was flown into the ground.

 

you are the perfect audience.
keep watching the show.

 

What benefit came from these wars? Wars that we are conviently ending?

They do so regardless.

That's what happens when you destroy markets full of innocent civilian, and kill thousands with airplanes in the name of god.

Then who benefited from it?

Sounds a bit silly to start two wars just to put a prison to good use.

 

Over a decade now and you truthers STILL have no evidence to back up your silly stories.

THE DAY ITSELF – EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY

News flash. During an attack, neither the President nor the Secretary of Defense, nor any other top level officials need to "make decisions". That is all laid out in the protocols the military follows when under attack. Those protocols were followed, but were insufficient for dealing with an airborn terrorist attack from inside the country.

None of the above, nor should they have been. They are not normally in charge of military responses, so why should they have been on 9/11? Truthers like to pretend that everything has to come from a command on high vs. the reality of things happen much lower down and according to the book.

Wrong. They followed the procedures to the letter. They waited for the FAA to tell them who and where to intercept just like they are suppose to do. The problem was with confusion inside the FAA as to exactly which fllights were affected and where were they.

That was the job of the 9/11 commission; to tie all stories together and to iron out any discrepancies. Were they lied to? Yes. But according to their own admission they got to the bottom of it and now know the truth.

Not according to anyone except truthers. Fighter jets were launched when they were ordered to and by the people who were suppose to give those orders. Not ONE order has ever come to light saying they should stand down and not ONE person involved on 9/11 has said they were ordered to stand down.

Because truthers like to play fast and loose with the truth and they like to pretend any and all responses should be instantanious. Flight 11 was hijacked at 8:13. That is when truthers like DBM like to pretend everyone along the entire chain of command instantly knew about the attacks and the entire extent of the attacks and should have started evacuating places like the Pentagon even though they don't know it is a target. When was anyone at NORAD informed of a threat to Washington? 9:24. When did Flight 77 hit the Pentagon? 9:37, 13 minutes later.

Andrews AFB did not have planes ready and fueled for combat, nor were they suppose to. Those fighters were at Langley and were launched when a threat to Washington was reported.

Hanjour was not a failed Cessna pilot and made numerous solo flights. The "difficult aerobatic maneuver" was a 270 degree turn over several minutes and about as difficult as turning a car around.

They had a one in five chance. Funny how truthers think these odds prove a conspiracy.

And? The military is always practicing things like this. While all the elements were practiced, the combination seen on 9/11 wasn't. A convenient truth Truthers don't want anyone to realize.

Wrong on many fronts. They weren't wargames. The plane crashing into a government building was a local safety drill for a government office in the flight path of Dulles, was assumed a small plane, and was also assumed to be an accident. The emergency in NYC was a FEMA excercise, not military.

Also, the excercises spanned several days and were a semi-annual excercise. They were all canceled after the attacks started on 9/11.

They didn't. Truthers like to pretend they did, but in the process have to ignore all the evidence which exposes them for what they are.

One quote between NORAD and the FAA asking if this were real or simulated. Past that, everyone knew. Don't you love how truthers like to blow things out of proportion?

Nope. None of them were in or around Washington or NYC and if there was, it would have come to light long before now.

And now it becomes the Jews who did it. Funny how the anti-Semitism always leaks out at the end like pus from a festering wound.

It will be interesting to see if DBM will actually respond to any of this.

 

There is no way the acronym DBM and a thread like this is coincidental.

LOL

 

I just think that the terrorists got lucky and we were surprised because they pulled off a type of attack which had never happened before.

 

My post was in response to OJLeb's question "Was there ever an actual investigation?". The answer is yes. Whether you believe the outcome of the investigation to be true, well that's up to you.

I mean that's how these conspiracy theories work right? If there is conflicting data, you just have to label it as part of the conspiracy and problem is solved.

If anyone tries to tell you otherwise, then they are just "sheaple", clueless or part of the conspiracy. What a great system!

 

I disbelieved the official story within a few weeks after it came out. I know enough about how the government operates - it has committed countless of crimes, both against Americans and Countries. Because most Americans have allowed the cancer to spread so badly it’s going to come against them …..tyranny is going to be inflicted against them by the elite via the government.

 

I think it is very appropriate that this is in the religion forum. These beliefs completely depend on faith.

 

Faith and a complete and utter disregard for the truth / evidence.