There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment. We should have no security problems in our free States.
You only seem to have right wing religious dogma, down pat; not Any form of valid arguments. We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States.
Quit spamming the boards with your pre-programmed 'bot posts. If your programmer actually reads this, let's see if he is capable of reprogramming you. The "We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States." along with your "right wing religious dogma" statements in response to any challenge are both so repetitious across all forums as to be clearly a preprogrammed response. Your constantly erratic and erroneous capitalization in the middle of sentences, as well as nonsensical punctuation, only further demonstrate you are not a valid poster.
gossip instead of an argument, is not very Manly. We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States.
actually it started with deliberately and dishonestly misreading Cruikshank. These anti gun rights judges took the correct claim that the constitution /Bill of rights did not CREATE a RKBA to meaning non existed.
the lower court judge was a hard core gun banner who colluded with the FDR administration to create a case to allow the FDR lapdogs on the USSC to uphold the unconstitutional law http://migration.nyulaw.me/sites/default/files/ECM_PRO_060964.pdf Ragon did not really think the NFA violated the Second Amendment, and probably colluded with the government to create the ideal test case. His opinion is peculiar on its face, begging for an appeal. A memorandum disposition is appropriate when deciding a routine case, but not when holding a law facially unconstitutional....... Before he became a judge, Ragon represented the Fifth District of Arkansas in Congress from 1923 to 1933.111 As a congress- man, he was a vocal advocate of federal gun control. In 1924, Ragon introduced an unsuccessful bill prohibiting the importation of guns in violation of state law,112 and vigorously supported another bill prohibiting the mailing of most pistols, which eventually passed in 1927.113
most anti gun arguments are nothing more than the fact that Trump haters cannot handle the fact that Trump won and the NRA and gun owners played an important role in this fact. ITs also why gun banners are vehement about their gun hate without usually having any clue about guns. Its the politics of gun owners that motivates them, not any valid understanding of gun use, gun laws or gun violence
well its certainly not based on the following 1) an understanding of crime control, gun use or gun laws 2) a rational belief that passing laws that change the rights only of honest people with deter criminals 3) a bonafide belief that those who disobey the laws against murder and robbery and don't care about the consequences, will somehow bey gun laws
