There is Undeniable Mathematical Evidence the Election is Being Stolen

I see folks post endlessly about many internet rumors, like AGW, and such. I do know better. It's why we look for the data, which, seemingly isn't changing in the several states democrats seem to want to insist are "too close to call" like GA NC and AK

 

Georgia IS too close to call, that's why they are having a recount.
Alaska and NC were always going to the Republicans - no thinking people are denying that.
Your post is nonsensical.

 

Wow. This is Major Stuff.

In any Event, I have run several Quadrillion Simulations through my foolproof equation and one time it even spit out a simulation that had trump Winning in a 50-State Sweep.

The other 99.999999999999999999999999999% of the Time it showed a decisive Biden Victory.

Very simple (easy to understand) stuff:



I hope that all will find this informative.

Godspeed.

 

I'm not following the Senate race but fully understand Republicans supporting their local Rep candidate and not supporting Trump. I wouldn't call NC yet for Presidential or Senate. There are thousands of votes from D counties left to be counted which may turn NC blue but perhaps for the Senate it should be called. Seems like everyone has just forgotten about Alaska, perhaps Canada should have bought it off the Russians

 

GA if called would go to Biden. I would not be surprised if NC goes to Biden too when all votes are counted

 

NC will be closer than you think. See where the remaining votes are coming from

 

1) Explain Benford's law to us, in your own words, and why it should apply to the data you showed.
2) Show the distributions for more than a few cherry-picked districts and races.
3) Do back testing for previous elections.

Then, you can talk.

 

No. These are the total vote tallies by each voting district within a city or county. That is why it doesn't work.

First of all, the 3rd and 4th party candidates obviously only pulled 0-5 votes out of any given district on average. Thus their leading digits are 1-4 and their n value is lower because in many districts they didn't register a vote.

Given that Milwaukee's population is about 590k, and they have 464 districts, each district has about 1000 voters. If Biden is consistently pulling 70-80%, his average leading digit will be 6-9. Getting a leading digit of 1 or 2 will be less likely than a naturally occurring distribution.

 

There are mostly concerns where democratic governors and their SOSs have staffed their states. So, places like WI, MI, NC, PA, AZ NV seem to be in play. And specifically in large metro areas like Atlanta seem worth investigating. The best thing for the confidence of the country is concerned, we really want to make sure that there is transparency here, and frankly, its not looking good. We really want to make sure that in these contested areas, that the ballots counted are actually valid.

 

Yup! Good point.

BTW I like your avatar. Michelle is a beautiful woman.

 

Also curious to hear why they only went with the leading digit for Benford's Law. From what I'm reading now, second digit is a better indicator, and even the usefulness of that is contested.

 

We aren't discussing the presidential, so why are you inserting it?

 

That's called "circumstantial evidence",... --not "proof".

 

I haven't looked into this but I'd bet a dollar to your dime that there is a systemic explanation.

 

A claim of voter fraud in a presidential election isn't a discussion of "the presidential"?

 

The conversation was about the senate races. Thanks for playing.

 

The topic of the thread is the Presidential race. Thanks for playing.

 

When the right denies and attacks AGW, Medicare for all, COVID as a "hoax", minimum wage, BLM, and the USPS, we know it's time to ignore the right while they're just talking, and prosecute them when they're doing damage.

 

The conversation is the election is being stolen. I added the conversation about the Senate and lack of vote correlation between the presidential and the senate races. The thread doesn't specify which one. But thanks for playing.

 

I guess you haven't read the OP. FIRST LINE.

 

I know you guys have an affinity for gulags and reconciliation commissions. And here you are demanding that.

 

AH! So YOU took the thread off topic and you admit it. Now you want everyone to play according to your possible violation of Rule 5.

 

No, I'm telling you enough bullshit is enough.

 

The OP Link (Specifically) refers to the Presidential Race.

What are you talking about?