and you accept somebodies several pages of math as being better than common sense, lord help us all......
so has the "physics, math & evidence" proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that hijacked airliners were used as weapons?
Gosh, what if it was Santa Clause that ran into one building and his wife in the other. Just about as possible as your other fantasies you refuse to explain.
anybody have a comment about this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvpGj1pZC1s Will the real Osama Please stand up? .... or?
I can explain. The passports were with that red bandana so they survived and the black box must not have been treated with the same bomb proof magic dust that protected the paper passport and the cloth bandana. The four different people who were all supposed to be Osama Bin Laden shown the clip, must have been the same person(despite the obvious). I hope that I was able to clear those few details up for you.
How is it odd?...many personal affects, ID's, Wallets survived the crashes... Many more can be found here.... http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Personal_Effects_and_the_Crash-Proof_Passport No magic dust needed...happens all the time. This is just another example of Twoofers (in general, no one specific) inability to research and yet, making claims based on personal incredulity.
Which 'odd' are you referring to? The 'odd' part about 4 different people the government claimed were OBL), OR, the fact that the black box was obliterated, yet identifying bandanas and passports survived?
I've seen the ridiculous website countless times. It's complete nonsense and means nothing. Who runs that site anyway? That's YOUR proof??
Please explain why its complete nonsense?...because is shows that the ID surviving ther crash isn't as magical as you claim?
Tell you what. You accept and discuss my links (on an even basis) and I'll try and do the same with yours. Fair enough?
No. And here is why.... . This little tid bit just shows you have no real desire to learn how things happen...you just dismiss them out of hand. There is nothing to discuss...What was found, was found...and no amount of pissing and moaning, hand-waving or obfuscation can change that. So, why is it, you cant answer the question, straight away?
What was found, was either planted "evidence" or? People point out the fact that the towers fell, therefore the official story must be completely accurate, however, need I add, with or without explosives?
Oh, so it was planted. You have proof of this?...did those same people "plant" the landing gear...engine components...parts of the fuselage...??? I find it interesting you just make up claims when there is a gap in your position.
Given the fact that standard procedure was ignored, that is in accounting for the crashed aircraft, how is anyone to know for certain that the alleged aircraft bits are indeed from the airliner in question? and in fact, how is it known for certain that the "FLT175" or any of the aircraft were present at the site at all? there is no accounting for the aircraft! The problem is that there is a mass of random bits, that are said to be aircraft parts, but are they indeed aircraft parts and are then indeed from "FLT175" or just a bit of aircraft scrap? The physical evidence is key to making a case, without physical evidence you have the phone calls from the hijacked planes ( most probably fake ) and other bits that are also all too easy to fake, but what would insure that the case had weight, would be physical evidence and that is lacking.
Really...??? What "standard" procedure was ignored? Are you claiming the photos of fuselage parts are faked?...people turning parts in to police, fake? Ahhhhh....your red herring argument again...(allegedly) "the parts were not inventoried". Please prove they were not and then explain why it makes a difference? The physical evidence is overwhelming. You claim "fake" but yet, you cant show that anyone faked anything. Your just making fact-less assertions.
Whether or not the passports found on-scene were planted or not is a smaller detail than the known (*)(*)(*)(*)heads USED those passports to legally enter the U.S. and that the overwhelming majority of them should have been denied entry for two reasons 1) their passports were not filled out properly & 2) the IC knew they were (*)(*)(*)(*)heads.
When the NTSB investigates a commercial airliner crash, all of the bits are taken away to an isolated location to be inspected and cataloged as to what the part was and what its condition was, and also to record how much of the aircraft was recovered. In the case of "FLT11" "FLT175" "FLT77" & "FLT93" there was no inventory of aircraft bits and to cover for the fraud, the story was circulated that all the bits were shipped back to the airline companies, because the aircraft was their property therefore they should have what is left of their aircraft. This seriously distorts the rules of how evidence is handled. From one of the accounts of what was happening at Fresh Kills, there was an alleged aircraft expert on site who would look at a part brought up by anyone, and say yes or no, its an aircraft part or not, but then, exactly what happened to all the aircraft bits after that? if the bits recovered add up to less than 10% of the mass of a big Boeing airliner, then it begs the question exactly what happened to all the rest of it? The problem is one of accounting for the evidence + at present it most certainly appears that there is insufficient evidence to claim an airliner crashed at any one of the 4 locations alleged to be crash sites. in response to "prove it" I can not prove a negative, that is an inventory did not happen, however, if the people who are so interested in promoting the official story had the INFORMATION handy as to be able to provide a link to a DOCUMENT that is it was DOCUMENTED that the aircraft was accounted for ..... well there you have it .....
