Do you really expect that the schematics and technical details for the SECURITY CAMERA system of the PENTAGON is publicly available? Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of having it? Perhaps you would like some alarm codes as well. Patriot911 is right . . . you're just asking for evidence that no one can produce so that you can proclaim that lack of evidence is evidence of something sinister. All the more reason to do your own research.
I believe in the evidence. Present evidence truthers are speaking the truth and you can sway me. Unfortunately, not ONE truther has EVER been able to present a real piece of evidence their BS stories are true. Oh they have plenty of opinion and they like to pretend it is evidence, but that doesn't cut it. Yes. I know what you will do. You will move the goal posts. OK. Here is a site backing up what people are saying. And another one. Wasn't hard. Learn how to use Google. I believe what the evidence says and what I can research. So far all you've proven is you give truthers a free ride and demand everyone else to prove everything to you. Then you don't believe anyone until they present evidence of what they say which you could EASILY do and which would present you with a much more thorough understanding. Why? You've already proven you're uninterested in the truth. Someone presents information, you turn around and demand "credible" information. The only evidence the information is NOT credible is your own nasty sense of superiority. I don't think you're fooling anyone.
Is there any way I can get a shift schedule for you guys. My neighbor always wins on poker night so I need an edge for "Predict the Response" game. If I know who's on duty I got a chance. I hope you guys are making more than minimum wage blogging. At least on Sundays I hope you get time and a half.
More insults from the sock puppet. The least you can do is come up with something entertaining. The "paid government shills" angle has been done to death. So if we're paid, who pays you? Al Qaeda? Another terrorist group? Do you get off defending terrorists and deflecting blame from them? Or is it a job? Enquiring minds want to know.
Finally some sense. Then why do people in this thread talk like experts and know everything including frame rates for the cameras. They keep saying this is proof.
My point is frame rate capabilities for cameras available at the time WOULD be public information. If someone researched it for you and gave you the fps data, why would you doubt that person's facts? And if you did doubt them, why did you not research them yourself?
Those two links prove what? I was reading better sites that that yesterday. We are looking for the capabilities of the cameras the Pentagon had in 2001 not now. The one link talks about facial recognition software and cameras needed after 911. It doesn't say anything about pentagon cameras. I was going to save this for a predictable response but we've had facial recognition technology before then.
Then why don't you research them yourself? If he is wrong, post it here for all to see. Do you doubt that the security cameras at the Pentagon at the time were shooting 1 frame per second?
Of course not. If you don't believe him or do not have any background knowledge of security cameras research it yourself.
You guys can't even agree with each other some people suggest thats classified info and you suggest otherwise. Lonestar you don't bring anything other than trivial banter.
Finding out what security cameras were capable of in 2001 is not classified information. Why the obsession with this trivial morsel?
Ohh Jesus. What point would a schematic serve? Can you read a schematic? Could you even tell the difference between a pentagon camera schematic and a transistor radio? I doubt it. This pretty much seals the deal. You came here with talking points. You're not interested in discussion. I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you. By the way, facial recognition does not require high speed photography. So far you've argued from incredulity, but you've done nothing to address your actual point: that security cameras at the time should have been capable of capturing footage of a 757 traveling at 500+ mph through a space of +- 400 ft. You keep demanding proof of technology. What do you think supports your position? Your U2 camera technology assumptions, are false. Your TV and movie footage assumptions are false. Your facial recognition assumption is a red herring. Do you have anything else that supports your opinion that a viable system existed in 2001? Do you have anything that supports your opinion that such a technology would have served any useful benefit in securing the pentagon?
Now you say my U2 assumptions are false. Your changing your tune, because my point was we had incredible photographic technology at the time and a couple people agreed. That video at the beginning that shows a plane. Did you alter that video? You lost any credibility you had. Your misconstrue my words that's is why you guys pile on. Every couple posts somebody presents something you have to check out but mostly the other 4 posts are attacks. It's just a joke the way you guys work. Can't win here. Everythings OK in America yet were headed into WWIII, our Dollar has lost so much value. I suppose you guys look at official employment numbers to. 1.2 million people fell out of the labor force and the unemployment rate was reduced and you guys probably think thats a good thing because our government said so. And the new inflation numbers they must be accurate. Hows this for inflation reduction an IPAD 2 is twice as fast as an IPAD and costs the same so inflation went down. Quit drinking the KOOLAID. We are lied to.
