Trump: I'm willing to testify under oath about Comey claims

You live in a fantasy. All the actual lies, crimes, leaks, faked of dossiers, were all faked up by Democrats.

Lynch ordered Comey to lie, and he admitted he did, though it made him feel dirty and uncomfortable.
Trump asked him to tell the truth, and Comey refused! And then committed a crime by leaking privileged FBI information to the New York Slimes through a cut out.

And the casualness with which Comey admits lying, misleading the American People during an election season, coordinating with the Clinton Campaign, illegally leaking through cut outs to take out political opponents, and the only time he dug in and said "No way, I'll never do that!" is when Trump asked him to simply tell the truth?

The Swamp is so immersed with the Swamp that they have lost all perspective of how criminally corrupt they are.

Cleaning The Swamp is a Trump-sized task, and we have Trump!

 

SC=Special Counsel, not Supreme Court.

 

Ok, I'll be '73 in a few weeks. I lived in the real America most of my life. If you guys want to throw that all away by putting someone like Trump in charge, and then support him, there's nothing I can do about it at this point besides pointing out what a *******n shame it is. The guy isn't worth one drop of sweat, or blood, that our forefathers put into making this country into what it was.

 

Congrats on your richness in birthdays, I wish you many many more along with the health and vigor to relish them, but yeah, that is exactly the choice the electorate made, nearly 2/3rds of a year ago, and the dead-enders should have come to grips with that by last Thanksgiving, Christmas at the latest. Here we are coming up on July the Fourth and you still seem to view this as an open choice that if we all agree that we get a mulligan? WTH?

Come On!

 

I think he will too, but for a different reason. Right now, Trump is fuming because of all the attention Comey's hearing got. He can't let that stand, he needs to one-up Comey. TV rating are all Trump understands, he'll hush his lawyers and perjur himself for a couple hours to Mueller.

 

Excellent post!!

"...the banality of idiocy." - Spot-on!!

 

You probably should drop a line to Hillary while she's in the midst of her excuse-making tour. Excuse du jour #17: she lost 'cuz misogyny.

Get on it, comradski!

 

How could tapes which support Comey's narrative be a threat?


How could tapes which Trump hasn't even said exist be a threat?

 

Interesting to find out Comey lied under oath. Said he never felt he had to take notes under past presidents. He did with a one on one with Bush.

 

Seriously!

 

You still have a choice, don't support him. Even you should be able to figure out by now how removed he is.

 

I want him to clean up the swamp! Getting rid of this clown was a good start!

 

Don't make me laugh. Trump is the swamp.

 

He's the anti-Swamp!

May 31 (Alberto Luperon):
If Comey Testifies Trump ‘Pressured’ Him to End Russia Investigation, Legally, Is That Obstruction of Justice?Wednesday brought a new CNN report that claims fired FBI Director James Comey will testify publicly before the Senate Intelligence Committee. Not only that, but he is expected to say President Donald Trump pressured him to end the feds’ investigation into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. If this report pans out, then a question gets raised: Could Trump do this? If the allegation gets proven, would this be legal?

The suspense!

 

Well, I know you're not from NYC. Where are you from?

 

Comey Testimony was tough to watch, he was squirming like Russian Prostitutes were raining on him, man!

 

Where are you from?

 

^ Trump projection.

 

Trumplandia!


Race card expires for Democrats

The media slowly is admitting that the Democrat Party is in trouble. Kicking the working class to the curb in favor of minorities with grievances turned out to have a shelf life.

The post-Obama party finds itself out of power in all three branches of the federal government, as well as most states.

From Edsall:
Democrat pessimism today stands in contrast to the optimism that followed the elections of 2006, 2008 and 2012.At that time, the consensus was that Democrats had found the key to sustained victory. The party saw its future in ascendant constituencies: empowered minorities, singles, social liberals and the well-educated.Democratic activists saw the Republican Party as doomed to defeat without a radical change of course because it was tied to overlapping constituencies that they viewed as of waning significance — older, non-college, evangelical white Christians (Yewh!).Today, in a world of angry, fearful voters, it is liberal optimism that is at a low ebb — buffeted by a drumroll of terrorist incidents, rising levels of hostility toward criminal immigrants... Before 2016, no one, Democrat or Republican, thought that the man who would bring about radical change would be Donald Trump, except, perhaps,Trump himself. Trump has successfully forced Democrats to begin to examine the party’s neglected liabilities, the widespread resentment of its elites and the frail loyalty of its supporters. Blame Bill Clinton. He was able to cobble together enough aggrieved people -- African-Americans, Hispanics, gays, and any other group you could add an ophobic to their name -- to come up with a plurality of the votes in 1992 and 1996. The numbers grew until Obama managed bare majorities in 2008 and 2012.

Democrats saw their party on its ascendancy. Over time, white people would fade -- becoming just a plurality in a generation or two -- and Democrats would rule.

Here was the breakdown of the Obama coalition:

• people of color (African-American, Hispanic, or Asian) were 41% of his votes
• 29 or younger 22%
• female 60%
• unmarried 46%

Note the heavy reliance on sliver groups (with the exception of women). What happens when the 29 or younger turn 30? 40? 50?

Here was the larger problem with pandering to grievance groups: over time white racism, sexism, and homophobia faded.

Inter-racial marriages are common among whites and Hispanics and Asians and most families have a gay cousin, not a big deal.

In retrospect, Pajama Boy's talking points for Thanksgiving with Uncle Archie overlooked the fact that the family accepts the vegan, anti-gun, whatever else is fashionable politically, goofy manboy even though he was a pain in the ass. They tolerated him.

Remember, Archie put up with Meathead, and the string of snobby liberals who invaded Bunker's bunker, despite Meathead's a freeloading.

Social issues faded. We passed equal pay in 1963 and Civil Rights the next year. Americans accept change. What they resent is the Democrat Party's insistence that abortion, gay marriage, and other things be rammed down everyone's throats with a liberal dose of constant hectoring and virtue signalling.

Americans also resent every political debate that becomes steeped in self-righteousness by liberals.

Questioning climate change is immoral? Says who? Godless university professors?

But most of all, people resented the failure by the Democrat Party to deliver security, a strong economy, and hope for the future.

Under Obama, Muslim terrorists killed without Obama doing a damned thing about it. His solution was always the same: give me your guns and don't be Islamophobic.

A government that cannot protect the people winds up being replaced. We are lucky to have President Trump for if he had lost, the chances of a fascist takeover in 2020 would have increased alarmingly. Instead, the Marxists are the fascists.

Democrats failed. They need a new plan. I suggest not calling 46 percent of the voting public deplorable.

http://donsurber.blogspot.com/2017/06/race-card-expires-for-democrats.html#more

 

Hillary isn't president. What are you worried about?

 

People in these internet forums can't even answer a direct question.

 

It's hard for me to read a post from that self-described "genius" poster and not think: well that was really weird.

 

You can walk across this great nation and never leave Trumplandia. Traversing Clinton's Archipelago is an exercise in island hopping.

 

Percentage of popular vote for elected presidents from best, Harding, to worst, Adams. Trump, 3rd from last. Minus 2.1%

• Harding (1920)
• Coolidge (1924)
• Roosevelt (1936)
• Nixon (1972)
• Johnson (1964)
• Roosevelt (1904)
• Reagan (1984)
• Jackson (1832)
• Roosevelt (1932)
• Hoover (192
• Eisenhower (1956)
• Wilson (1912)
• Buren (1836)
• Jackson (182
• Buchanan (1856)
• Grant (1872)
• Eisenhower (1952)
• Lincoln (1860)
• Lincoln (1864)
• Roosevelt (1940)
• Reagan (1980)
• Taft (190
• Clinton (1996)
• Bush (198
• Roosevelt (1944)
• Obama (200
• Pierce (1852)
• McKinley (1900)
• Harrison (1840)
• Clinton (1992)
• Grant (186
• Taylor (184
• Truman (194
• McKinley (1896)
• Obama (2012)
• Wilson (1916)
• Cleveland (1892)
• Bush (2004)
• Carter (1976)
• Polk (1844)
• Nixon (196
• Cleveland (1884)
• Kennedy (1960)
• Garfield (1880)
• Bush (2000)
• Harrison (188
• Trump (2016)
• Hayes (1876)
• Adams (1824)

Source: David Leip, U.S. Election Atlas

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/polit...y-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/index.html

Where are you from?

 

What a crock.

>>The following is a timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama from his inauguration as president of the United States on January 20, 2009<<

>>The financial crisis of 2007–2008, also known as the global financial crisis and the 2008 financial crisis, is considered by many economists to have been the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s.[1][2][3][4]

It began in 2007 with a crisis in the subprime mortgage market in the US, and developed into a full-blown international banking crisiswith the collapse of the investment bank Lehman Brothers on September 15, 2008.<<
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007–2008

>>The September 11 attacks (also referred to as 9/11)[nb 1] were a series of four coordinated terrorist attacks by the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda on the United States on the morning of Tuesday, September 11, 2001<<
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks