Trump's Four Obstruction of Justice Crimes 100% proven in the Mueller Report

With what?

Show us one thing, just one, in Mueller's findings that would stand up as proof in a court of law?

If he had any then democrats would be all over it asking why the DOJ isn't prosecuting Trump.

But they aren't and do you know why?

Because there is nothing.

Show us this evidence please.

 

There is nothing that is proof in those 13 pages, that is what I am telling you.

If you see something then show it to us.

Every single bit of it is purely circumstantial and is in no way proof of anything.

It's nothing but what ifs and maybe's or possibly's.

 

No, you have nothing. No crime because justice wasn't obstructed.

In case you havent noticed, Mueller finished his investigation.

 

I’m in construction. Was in the army under bush SR, but a civilian under Clinton, bush jr, Obama, but this is off the hook with trump. I broke $200k last year for the first time in my life.

 

Rep. Justin Amash (R) says there is proof and crimes in the report.

 

You ought to get familiar with what obstruction of justice is. Obviously you are clueless although that doesn't seem to stop you from speaking your mind on it.

 

OK, what is this proof?

 

Ask Amash.

 

Funny how none of you liberals here can answer this question with even a single thing.

 

They see facts that aren’t there and you cannot convince them otherwise. Same with those that swear they saw a ghost, in their home.

 

Because he says so?

 

And Barr concluded there was wasn’t onstruction. Case closed! but they just won’t accept it, time to destroy Barr! Lol

 

Because none of them are a crime. It is not obstruction of justice. It doesn't establish intent to obstruct justice. What part of this do you not get? None of what was said, discussed, nothing that was proposed, and nothing that was done or proposed to be done amounts to a crime.

 

Mueller report is porn to them. They get off on it at bedtime. They treat it as a riddle or puzzle that mueller drafted to send cripted messages to people outside DOJ, since he was a prisoner of trump and barr. They have been trying to decode, solve the riddle, put the puzzle back together. It’s hilarious.

 

Yep, it's hilarious.

 

He will be indicted the moment he's no longer President.

The IRS is waiting for some indictments too. They have an active investigations on him stealing money from his charity,

 

I don't give a crap what happens to him after he's President.

Enjoy your sour grapes.

 

It's way past the point when NORMALLY a special counsel would testify, clarify, and elaborate on his investigative conclusions. But ... NORMALLY a special counsel actually submits investigative conclusions, whereas Bob did not. This thread posted 2 minutes after the OP's "intro" which 'splains Mueller's "hands were tied" and "lips are sealed". This thread could be marketed as a digital version of the board game "Clue". "Obstruction" in the WH "Dining Room" with the "Loyalty Pledge" ? "Collusion" in Flynn's "Office" witth the "Telephone" ? Sorry, no ... "Treason" in McCabes "Office" with the "Leaking, Lying & Spying" ...

 

So, OOJ has to prove criminal intent. The WH cooperated fully with Mueller turning over millions of documents, advising that all cooperate, and never claiming executive privilege. That Trump was upset over a 2 1/2 year investigation based on a hoax dossier and claiming such in the press would not rise to criminal intent.

 

Normally, the prosecutor submits his report to the DOJ and the DOJ makes any prosecutorial decisions. What is abnormal is releasing it to Congress which Barr promised and did for the country but of course that has never been enough for the yahoos that have been calling for impeachment just because Trump won the election. The dem clown show is what is way past normal.

 

Sorry, but every one of them is,.

 

The White House did not cooperate fully. Indeed, the White House took ongoing steps to impede the investigation, right up to, dismissing the investigators and disbanding the investigation., Fortunately, the White House council ignored his boss’ instructions and did not carry out his orders.

Reciting false tallking points just because your fuhrer bellows them does not make them true.

 

LOL, you mean talking to advisors which, BTW, is covered under executive privilege which was never used. You really need to make a stretch to claim that wanting the investigation to stop because it was bogus in the first place is criminal intent.

 

Except that’s not what “we”say, when you ask for proof that Trump is a congenital liar. His lies run into the tens of thousands, and he rarely speaks without saying something completely false.

Indeed, his “fully exhonorated” chant is a total lie. Not even lickspittle Barr could bring himself to say that in his now infamous memo.

Enjoy your Trump Steak!

 

Executive priviledge does not cover talking to advisors about covering up White HOuse activities. Nor does it extend to discussion on how to forstall investigation into potential crimes. Your claim is false, as usual.

Your claim that the investigation was “bogus” is also false. The Nunes fake “fruit of a poisonous tree” meme is BS.

But the Trump White House and the right wing noise machine have kept it alive in hopes of setting up a counter narrative that Trumpsters can cling to, while continuing to ignore and dismiss the facts, as you are doing.,