Trump's response to Bounty-gate

You won't even accept investigations conducted by your own party.

Hyper partison much?

 

No this is an example of rational people calling out the anti-Trumpers on their false accusations and how government officials and the MSM plotted to effect the election and even after told the information has no veracity as with the Mueller report the left and MSM keep up with the false narragitves.

 

But just how valuable was the polling and campaign strategy data that Paul Manafort, Trump’s campaign chairman, gave to a Russian agent?

According to Brad Parscale, Trump’s election data guru, the information that Manafort handed directly to Russian intelligence was of critical importance, determining “98 percent” of the campaign’s resource allocations (such as spending on TV, radio and social media ads, rallies, field operations, and so on).

Indeed, the data was so important that Parscale kept a visualization of the information on his iPad at all times, allowing him to tell then-candidate Trump where to conduct his next rally at a moment’s notice.

According to the then-Republican-led Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the ultrasensitive campaign information that Manafort passed to a Russian spy “identified voter bases in blue-collar, democratic-leaning states which Trump could swing,” including in “Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Minnesota.”

Proprietary campaign data was handed over to a Russian intel operative. I could reword that in any number of ways. It all amounts to the same thing. The Trump campaign cooperated with Russia's interference in the election. That's an irrefutable fact.

Manafort shared campaign info with Russian intelligence officer, Senate panel finds
https://thehill.com/policy/national...mpaign-info-with-russian-intelligence-officer

 

Which "Russian" was that? The same "Russian" that was a State Department source under Obama since 2012, lol?

 

All that is reported publicly and there are lots of other polls and the Russians could hire their own polling and so what, he thought he we giving it to friend not the Russian government and you are talking other than polling data now. And it changed nothing.

So back to the subject at hand and the phony Bountygate reporting

 

The Worst President Ever Donnie specializes in hoaxes, including lying about his campaign's well-documented involvement with the Russians in the 2016 presidential campaign and lying about 2020 presidential being rigged against him. What it is with the radical right and their constant need to rewrite history to fit their anti-American agenda? I guess that I missed the one person who presented the Russian bountygate as fact, assuming that person even exists.

 

Dodge and diversions noted.....................oh well.

 

With all due respect what the hell are you taking about?

 

Out of curiosity; how much respect do you believe I am due?

No worries. I will catch you up.

In post 50 you responded to Lee Atwater's comment by proclaiming the Russia investigation was a lie.

This dispite the fact multiple examples of collusion (collusion is what the report was about) were shown in the Mueller report.

Unless you can you tell me which democrat appointed Mueller; at this point common sense dictates this is a Republican investigation.

So...

1. You thought the Russia investigation was a lie.

2. You evidently did not believe the report of an investigation conducted by your own party.

If your response includes anything about activists judges, deep state or RINOs please feel free to not respond.

 

1 collusion is not of necessity illegal.
2. They never proved anything illegal they only alleged, and at least two of those appear to have been acts of entrapment. Manafort may have been convicted on the basis of fraudulent evidence.

And what Republican investigation? I remember a handful of never Trumpers getting pissy about the events of January 6 but that's about it.

 

The fantasy you conjured up doesn't change what actually happened. But then Trump devotees have not been able to deal with the truth from the beginning so.........

 

Agreed, but lets not move the goal posts here.

They did prove collusion.

Funny how you speak of things not being proven then pivot to defend your guy by saying "it appears...". That how is how partisonship works.

The Mueller report was a republican investigation of which you claimed collusion was a lie.

 

It's what actually did not happen that is the issue you seem to miss.