U.S. military paying for women in military to travel for abortions

The U.S. military is paying for women service members to travel out of state to get abortions.

The Pentagon has policy that reimburses service members for travel expenses and offers up to 21 days of leave for abortions and fertility treatment.
This began in February 2023.

What a great idea it was to allow females into the armed forces...

U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, where abortion is heavily restricted, has been blocking the nominations for promotions of 200 high level military officers, trying to pressure the Defense Department to rescind the policy.

Under current law, military hospitals are barred from providing abortion, except for health reasons or rape, so the Biden Administration appears to be using this as a strategy to help promote abortion in the armed forces.

 

U.S. military paying for women in military to travel for abortions

GOOD......we need people able to serve and fight, not be out with a pregnancy they don't want.

 

LOL, There would be NO problem at all IF Anti-American Anti-Choicers didn't restrict women's rights

BUT, of course , YOU want to blame women for the mess.....

What a crooked, conniving anti-American jerk Tommy Tuberville is...his name sounds like a kid's cartoon character....and he IS !!!

ONLY Anti-Choicers call protecting women's right to CHOICE as "promoting abortion".....also implying women are easily swayed, cattle, children....how misogynistic!

 

Wow

 

BTW, your denigration of the service people, our troops, the ones protecting you is NOTED

 

It's clear that they are pro-abortion not pro-choice. They sure go out of their way to make sure 'birthing-people' can kill unborn persons.

 

What an illogical and unprovable comment.

Your denigration of the service people, our troops, the ones protecting you, is NOTED

 

From a thread by one of your Anti-Women's rights friends:

Qualified youth: 71% of youth do not qualify for military service because of obesity, drugs, physical and mental health problems, misconduct, and aptitude


So you don't want capable people to serve because they are "female" ????

 

Actions speak louder than words. Another great saying is follow the money.

I didn't come up with the term "Birthing-Person". Your idiot leftist masters did.
https://www.newsweek.com/biden-admi...thing-people-maternal-health-guidance-1598343

 

Its either that, or pay them to have the baby and raise it. The problem is that pregnancy takes the service member out of service for an extended period of time.

Maybe it would make more sense to have women on the pill while in service, and that way there would be no need for abortions. As a matter of fact I just read and learned that its very common for women in service to be on the pill to prevent pregnancy and other even more obvious benefits

 

I am sure that most were and I disagree with forcing that on them. In that case it really is their body, their choice.

 

I wasn't talking about that word, I was talking about your entire view of our military women....how they can serve our country and fight for YOU BUT YOU don't want them to have rights...
FoxHastings said: ↑
Your denigration of the service people, our troops, the ones protecting you, is NOTED

 

So it's their body, their choice until they get pregnant and then they lose the right to bodily autonomy?? AGAIN, completely illogical

 

Having it paid for isn't about rights. It's a benefit.

 

Her rights to her body do not include the body of the unborn person she put there against their choice.

 

Sure, but there IS a law saying that federal money cannot be used for abortions, so there is that. See Hyde Amendment.

 

The military covers health care for its members.

Abortion is health care.

To not cover abortion would be wildly inconsistent. It would be allowing partisan politics control what health care servicemembers get.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So it's their body, their choice until they get pregnant and then they lose the right to bodily autonomy?? AGAIN, completely illogical

I'm not sure what that has to do with the post of mine you quoted ...

BUT if military spending ( always OVER spending) is a problem for some abortions are a drop in the bucket compared to how tax payers are getting ripped off by the military....

And IF they are worried that their money is spent "murdering babies" then what TF do they think the military is for ? It's for killing..

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So it's their body, their choice until they get pregnant and then they lose the right to bodily autonomy?? AGAIN, completely illogical

IF the fetus is NOT part of the woman's body then she has all the more right to have it removed....and then it can grow on it's OWN if it's so damn independent


Now, explain how a fetus can present it's CHOICE???? By Morse code, a phone call ??? It can't make a choice , is not aware of anything...

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
I wasn't talking about that word, I was talking about your entire view of our military women....how they can serve our country and fight for YOU BUT YOU don't want them to have rights...

Your denigration of the service people, our troops, the ones protecting you, is NOTED

 

You know FoxHastings, another simple suggestion would have been GENDER SEGREGATION. So these young horny 18 to 24 year olds don't get each other pregnant!

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
GOOD......we need people able to serve and fight, not be out with a pregnancy they don't want.

Leave it to you to suggest something so sexist.......I don't think that is how armies deploy their fighters....

See, if there's a big battle for instance ...they can't build a big wall between the female and male soldiers.....they are all together..

I see you really don't seem to know much about the military


Now try to address my other posts

 

Most of the time there is no battle going on.

And if you send women to the front lines, especially to some military conflict in the Middle East (which seems to be very likely these days), just what do you think will happen to them if captured?
"No big deal" because they can just get abortions, right?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
See, if there's a big battle for instance ...they can't build a big wall between the female and male soldiers.....they are all together..
I see you really don't seem to know much about the military

LOL, now you're dancing away from YOUR topic """"You know FoxHastings, another simple suggestion would have been GENDER SEGREGATION. So these young horny 18 to 24 year olds don't get each other pregnant!""""


ANYTHING to deflect from the FACT that you had to avoid my other posts

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
See, if there's a big battle for instance ...they can't build a big wall between the female and male soldiers.....they are all together..
I see you really don't seem to know much about the military

Another ILLOGICAL conclusion only based on your desperation......