UNESCO Passes Resolution Critical of Israeli Conduct in Jerusalem and Gaza

Article 3 of The Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law still provide the oppurtunity for the Minister of the Interior to grant the ingabitant of an area citizenship or a license to reside in Israel.

 

The official commentary contradicts what the ICJ said.

 

Article 2 is mentioned in the official commentary of the Fourth Geneva Convention.I al ready provided the source.

 

Already replied to such claim. Please re-read previous replies of mine in this thread.

 

Israel did not offer them all to return.
Israel did not even offer some of them to return to their own homes... just to a piece of desert.

Israel must comply with the UN Charter, and let them all return to their homes.

You're making up the Arab institute says 70% left because Arab leaders asked them.

 

the Internation Criminal Court has more power and authority than the Red Cross.

UN Members are not legally required to respect statements of the Red Cross

they are legally required to obey the ICJ

 

It's not

 

That not was the UN said:

Source: http://www.un.org/en/decolonization/its.shtml

 

The ICJ overrules the Red Cross

 

So why states does not respect Article 80 of the UN Charter? The ICJ reaffrimed it several of times.

 

It is, just read the official commentary.

 

The UN says the Geneva Conventions apply to Israel and the Settlements.
All Israeli's living in the settlements are illegal.

 

The official commentary shows otherwise.

 

Article 80 protects the rights of Trusteeship Territories that are under Trusteeship Agreements.

your own quote says so

 

hahahahahaah!!!!

the Red Cross is crap, compared to the ICJ

 

I have.
Article 2 is not mentioned.
Israel is not mentioned
Geneva Conventions is not mentioned.
You are making it up

Also. The UN overrules the Red Cross.
You are making it up that the Red Cross over rules the UN.

 

Israel did not offer all, because Israel was not evecuated all of the Arabs. Alot of them left by choice.

Not at all. You can read it in From Time Immemorial.

 

ok, so point to the Trusteeship Agreement for Palestine.

All Trusteeship Territories have a Trusteeship Agreement.

http://www.un.org/en/decolonization/nonselfgov.shtml


funny, Palestine isn't listed in the above link.

 

You can find Article 2 of the Fourth Geneva Convention in page 17 of the Official Commentary of the Red Cross.

The official commentary of the Red Cross shows otherwise.

 

many Jews left Germany by choice, too.

 

Red Cross is not an international treaty and has ZERO legal weight.

 

Tokyo Draft of 1932, that were created by the Red Cross made the way for creating a binding convention regarding the protection of civillians in enemy territory, since the convention of 1929 was limited itself for recommendation to issue a convention on the protection of civilians in enemy territory and in enemy occupied territory. The Tokyo Draft that the Rod Cross created in 1932 was needed to be submitted in 1940 to a diplomatic conference but WWII postponed it. The events of WWII showed the disastrous consequences of the absence of a convention for the protection of civilians in wartime, and thus finally the process that was needed to be completed in a convention in 1940, was finally fulfilled in 1949 when the Fourth Geneva Convention created:

Source: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/380

Therefore, the Rod Cross has a crucial part of the creation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, as it can be read above.

 

you are making it up the Red Cross is able to over rule the verdict of the international court of justice.

 

Once again:
According to the UN:

The individual agreement with the states administering "Palestine was the Mandate.

Source: http://www.un.org/en/decolonization/its.shtml

 

Prior to the rise of the Nazi party.